ipl-logo

Federal Mandated Healthcare Pros And Cons

413 Words2 Pages

Cody Dulac
Polis 210
Short essay

Healthcare Issues

For decades affordable healthcare has been an ongoing issue that has plagued our country. Many believe that healthcare should be provided to the people by the government at an affordable cost. Others believe that it should fall upon the individual to provide healthcare for their selves; others also believe that it should be mandated by state. No matter what the belief all can agree that some form of healthcare is better than none at all. The issue that needs to be addressed is should the federal government mandate healthcare for all citizens or should it be mandated at state level.
There are benefits to having federally mandated healthcare. One of the benefits would be it would greatly improve the healthcare system by creating equal healthcare for all citizens ("Advantages of Government Health Care."). Another benefit of having …show more content…

One of the disadvantages of having federally mandated healthcare would be that it would eliminate competition by eliminating competition the need for innovation would also be eliminated. One of the biggest disadvantages would be that it would increase the federal debt. (Pros & Cons of Universal Health Care)
Some of the benefits of having state mandated healthcare would be that it would fall on state legislators to regulate healthcare to meet specific needs that differ from each state. It would allow for more flexibility. Some disadvantages would be that it could potentially drive up the cost of coverage because it would vary from state to state (Carey, Mary Agnes).
A solution to this decade plus issue that might solve some of the problems would be to meet somewhere in the middle. It would be a hybrid system that takes the best of both healthcare systems. A federally regulated healthcare system that has the flexibility to cover the needs that differ from state to state, that would be affordable to the

Show More
Related
1130 Words | 5 Pages

The debate over healthcare and health insurance has been disputed over for many years among politicians. The question many of them ask, along with the citizens of America, is simply whether the state or federal government should control health care. While there are pros and cons to both sides, there is a clear answer to this long fought over issue. Health care should be run by states because they manage their health insurance exchanges more efficiently, maintain the cost and quality of health insurance and care, and are constitutionally and lawfully accountable. States should run the health care system because state-run health exchanges are managed more efficiently than federal-run exchanges.

Read More
276 Words | 2 Pages

This would also stop medical bankruptcies, improve public health and reduce overall healthcare spending to name a few, (healthcare.procon.org, n.d.). The con argument is this results in socialism and is the individual’s responsibility, it’s not the governments role to secure healthcare and this would decrease the quality and availability of healthcare and increase debt and spending, (healthcare.procon.org,

Read More
1605 Words | 7 Pages

In addition to the dismay of many healthcare professionals, patients, and citizens who are uninsured, several flaws about the current healthcare system show the necessity for reform. The three flaws that exacerbate the current healthcare crisis are: the tax code and tax breaks, the lack of preventable care and adequate care of chronic diseases, and administrative costs. A single payer, universal healthcare system can resolve the major flaws of the

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

On average, medical costs in the United States are 2X more than other developed countries. A large part of this is due to the uncharacteristic lack of government involvement. I believe that if the government helps regulate the prices of services and medicine, then the impact of not having Obamacare or cutting Medicaid’s budget would have less of an adverse effect on the population. There are many ways the price of health care could be reduced, but a way the government can directly impact this issue is by negotiating prices. If this were to happen, the need of high coverage health insurance could decrease.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

Another recommendation is to change Medicaid so that states like New York and California won’t take as big a hit. These are two of the biggest states in our country, and if everyone in those states had to pay more it could creative massive problems for the state. There needs to be a balance between all the states and lowering the changing in funding per person will not only help California and New York, but also states like Oregon and Washington DC that were going to have to pay more. The last recommendation is to have create guidelines and rules for the states to follow. If states were allowed a lot of freedom and power for health guidelines, this would create problems for the health organizations.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

On the one hand, the expansion in coverage has paved the way for high quality and affordable healthcare for millions of Americans who could not afford the same. In Obamacare’s Ups And Downs, As Seen by a Republican Doctor, Francine Kiefer informs her readers that since the ACA, national statistics showed that a record low of “8.6 percent of people” did not have health insurance by the first quarter of 2016 (par.20). In South Tucson, Arizona, a “$5 million federal grant” to the El Rio Community Health Center set the foundations on which the people could access the same level of health care they could if they had access to private practices (Kiefer par.23). That is so despite the truth that most of the patients [60%] “live at or below the federal poverty line” (Kiefer par.23). On the contrary, and in an undeniable liability, there is the mandate that all persons ought to “carry health insurance” (Kleinke par.6).

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Insurance companies set limits on the amount of money they would spend on an individual consumer. • More Screenings Are Covered • Lower Prescription Drug Costs. Disadvantages of having the Affordable Care Act • Many People Have to Pay Higher Premiums. • You Can Be Fined if You Don’t Have Insurance.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

In America, universal healthcare would undermine principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would undermine individual liberty, free enterprise and free

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

In free markets, personal liberty provides two important things. First, it allows people to choose the services they think are best. Second, it empowers entrepreneurs to solve problems and meet needs medical related or not. Universal healthcare would make entrepreneurs unable to meet the medical needs of their neighbors.

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

Healthcare is an important access we hold, but an issue is that not everyone can have that access to the healthcare they need. There are many arguments regarding the United States adopting a universal healthcare system. Although the universal system may reduce the quality of care the people receive, there are too many people not able to get any kind of care. Therefore a universal healthcare system would be more beneficial to the citizens of the United States than the limited access of care we have today.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

Arguments in Opposition to Universal Healthcare Even with the strong evidence supporting universal healthcare, opponents frequently voice doubts about its viability and possible downsides. The cost of setting up and running a universal healthcare system is one of the key counterarguments. Opponents claim that implementing such a system would require a large financial outlay and would result in increased taxes for both individuals and

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

Everyone should be able to be given proper healthcare whether they have insurance or not. America should convert to a universal healthcare system. There are many pros and cons behind the problems that America faces without a universal plan. Health care and human rights is a problematic topic in every country. There is health care spending, historic debate on right to health care, and Obamacare.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

Health care for everyone is able to give people time out of the financial debt if they have no insurance. When you have no insurance you have to pay out of pocket for all doctor visits and also you might be rejected medical help. So when there is everyone on one page with health care you are able to have your finances in tack a little more also if it becomes more inexpensive for the people. Don 't you think that your body is worth the try?The government makes millions dollars of the medical industry weather prescription drugs,insurance companies,and doctor visits. When everyone is the same that means the government would have to set one set prices for everyone to be able to survive financially in it and not everyone is able to go into

Read More

More about Federal Mandated Healthcare Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document