Federalism, Checks And Balances, And Big States V Small States

715 Words3 Pages

After all the challenges the United States faced in making the Constitution, our Founding Fathers had to revise the “rough draft” called, The Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation weren’t sufficient to make this country succeed, therefore we created a new Constitution. The Constitution was written in May of 1887 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Our new Constitution made it possible for us to become a country based on Federalism, or a compound government and not result in tyranny. What is tyranny? Tyranny is when one or more people have absolute power over a government. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in four ways which were Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and Big states v.s. Small States also …show more content…

These three branches have certain duties for instance, the legislative branch or sometimes referred as congress consists of two parts the House of Representatives and the Senate which are in charge of making the laws. The executive branch enforce the laws and is lead by the President. Moreover, the judicial branch is composed of courts such as the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and District Courts and examine if a law is constitutional. Separation of powers protects against tyranny because the power is separated in between three branches so that one branch won’t have all the …show more content…

small states also known as The Great Compromise which means the compromise between the desires of the large states and small states. Large states wanted more representation in the House and Senate but the small states disagreed because it was a biased proposal. As a result, the delegates specifically Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth from the Connecticut delegation suggested that representatives should be elected by the people based on the population of the state and senators would be chosen by the state legislatures with the limit of two per state. The Great Compromise protects against tyranny because it does not give excessive power to the larger states by giving them more representation in both the House and