Federalist Paper 69 Analysis
Ernie Law Zink 3° US History 15 September 2016 DBQ Essay When the delegates met in 1787 they aimed to fix the national government. The previous governmental charter, the Articles of Confederation, failed because it was just too weak and wasn’t getting the job done. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no court system, no chief executive, and there was no particular way for the central government to force states to pay their taxes. By creating the Constitution, it would build a stronger central government and would be able to hold the nation together.
There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.
In 1787 and 1788, the Federalist Papers were written and published in various newspapers in the state of New York intended to encourage Yorkers to vote in ratifying the proposed Constitution. The famous papers consist of eighty-five essays authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In Federalist Paper No. 17, Alexander Hamilton explicitly addresses the fear that the proposed Constitution would lead to oppression at the hands of an “autocratic” national government. Hamilton argues that even if the national government were to try and seize the power of the states, it would not be simple to do. The main reason Hamilton gives that the States rights would be reserved is because these government have a greater influence over
The Federalist Papers No. 51 were written by either James Madison or Alexander Hamilton to address the various concerns the residents of New York had with the newly formed government provided to them and the other colonies via the Constitution, more specifically the purpose of the new structure of government, the separation into different branches of the government and each branch’s reliance on the people, and the system of checks and balances and duties placed on each branch among other things. The Federalist Papers No. 51 also explained the necessity of the government outlined in the Constitution and why the founding fathers found it best to arrange the new government the way they did. One of the main ideas addressed in the Federalist
In Federalist Paper Number 70, Alexander Hamilton wrote an article titled The Executive Department Further Considered. In this paper Hamilton using the pseudonym Publius, makes the case for a single-person executive chief for the future federal government. Hamilton writes that the President must have qualities as an “Executive which are the most necessary ingredients…vigor and expedition. ”
In the Federalist Paper number 51, Madison writes to the people of New York to explain that it is necessary for a separation of powers between the departments of the government. Madison, with the help of Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to explain sections of the Constitution. In Federalist Paper number 51, Madison explains that the government does not have a strong structure on the outside, but creating a firm structure within the government could be a solution. The firmer structure would be the separation of powers. In order for the people to get a better idea and make a more accurate judgement about the separation of powers, Madison shares observations and puts them into simpler terms.
Imagine living in a society where there are no rules, everyone can do whatever they desire, with no type of consequences. With this system, there would be no control. Therefore, we need diverse types of papers to keep and protect our society and the individuals of society. One of many important documents holding our communities together is The Federalist No. 10 created by James Madison in 1787. In these papers, James Madison addressed his point of view on concerning the constitution.
In “Federalist No. 69”, Alexander Hamilton wrote to inform and persuade the public to agree to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Particularly, he focused on the executive leadership’s role in the new government. He described the number of years the President can serve for before he is eligible for reelection. The President’s conduct and actions regarding legal matters are described as not being above the law. Law-making checks are imposed on the President as the two houses carry a large say.
I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.
One of the changes in American politics was the changing role of the federal government. This is evident in James Madison's veto message from 1817 where he expresses his difficulty in reconciling a bill for internal improvements with the Constitution (POV - Doc 2). This document reveals a shift in the understanding of the federal government's role in the economy and infrastructure, and the growing debate over the
The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.
Federalist Paper #51 People of America, This nation was built on ideas of liberty, equality, and democracy. Although many oppose the idea of the United States Constitution because they believe that the strength of the national government poses a threat to individual freedom, the United States Constitution actually enforces these three ideas at the same time as outlining the powers of national, state, and local government. It provides important limitations on the government that protect the fundamental rights of U.S citizens, but also outlines the powers that the national government has. The U.S Constitution also has a series of checks and balances between the different branches of federal government to regulate its power. These checks and balances are one of the key principles of the Constitution, and its necessity is explained in Federalist No. 51.
In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton lays out his vision for how the Supreme Court of the United States should function. In it, he assures that one of the key roles of the Supreme Court will be to check the constitutionality of congressional legislation in order to protect the individual rights of the people. However, in his opinion for the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall interprets the power of judicial review from Article III of the constitution, in a way in which the court becomes a powerful branch of government. With Marshall’s interpretation, the court is able to “strike down” legislation by the command of the people which is embedded in the Constitution (O’Brien 173). Hamilton intended for the court to
The executive branch is necessary to keep the United States government dependable and stable. Although there is a fear that the United States will revert to the tyrannical state it was previously in, having one executive is the only way for our new nation to succeed. Thomas Hobbes explains the reasoning for this best: human nature leads to war unless there is a commonwealth . For this commonwealth to flourish, it must have an executive power at its center to ensure America’s prosperity. Further, as explained in Federalist 68, the executive gains power through the people, it is in not inherited.
James Madison, founding father and fourth president of United States wrote the federalists paper number 10 in favor of the constitution. He believes that constitution is the only way to keep balance and control any problem this country faces. He uses faction as an example and talks about how it can cause problems but most importantly how to deal with the problems. He defines faction as groups of people who came together to promote their own interests and opinions. He said that these groups take advantage of the public and violate their rights.
More about Federalist Paper 69 Analysis
DBQ Summary: Federalism And The Constitution
756 Words | 4 PagesFederalist No. 78 Summary
63 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of Federalist Paper No. 17
136 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of The Federalist Paper No. 51
774 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Federalist Paper Number 70 By Alexander Hamilton
1552 Words | 7 PagesFederalist Paper Number 51 Summary
592 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of The Federalist No. 10
827 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Federalist No. 69 By Alexander Hamilton
487 Words | 2 PagesThe Anti-Federalist No. 84
392 Words | 2 PagesMajor Changes In American Politics Between 1812 And 1840
654 Words | 3 PagesThe Federalist No. 10 Argument
978 Words | 4 PagesFederalist No. 51 Research Paper
608 Words | 3 PagesFederalist No. 78 By Alexander Hamilton
1567 Words | 7 PagesThe Role Of The Executive In Federalist Paper 68
884 Words | 4 PagesEssay On The Federalists
498 Words | 2 Pages