ipl-logo

Feudal System: Life In The Middle Ages

1164 Words5 Pages

The Middle Ages was a very dark and difficult time for many people because of the creation of the dreaded feudal system. The feudal system was a system that divided people into different classes due to their wealth. Many people didn 't like how it worked except for the king because he was the highest person in the feudal pyramid. The feudal system started very small but after hundreds of years it had expanded into all of medieval Europe. The peasants, or poor people had to work long hours and had minimum wage and had not a lot of food. The upper class people didn 't have to work so they made the peasants their slaves. People thought this was very unfair but no one would want to challenge the powerful king. Overall, feudalism in the Middle …show more content…

Life in the Middle Ages for peasants had many drawbacks that made their lives very difficult. The houses were said be be made of “logs, mud, and a thatched roof made of straw” (King 33). The houses were maintained very poorly and made very poorly and had many leaks in the roof because the roof was made of only straw, unlike the king’s and the lord’s castles that were made of cement and were very sturdy. The peasants were very, very poor and didn 't have much supplies for their house. In fact, the peasants had supplies such as “a plank table, and three-legged stools that they sat on. The women usually made the clothes and the bed was made out of straw and they usually wore a garment held together by a rope and walked barefoot” (33). They had little to no rights what so ever. Since they had to give away lots of the food that they hard farmed, they had little food. A usual meal consisted of any vegetables, and very little meat from ducks, a goose, or a chicken that they had raised on their own farm for a special occasion. They were extremely lucky to have very little meat for dinner because they only farmed crops and for free labor. They worked on the fields so they can have protection from the lords who they were turned into their “master”. Usually if you were a peasant your parents were probably peasants too. If you we a peasant it was because of upbringing. Typically “90% of the population of the common village was made up of serfs and peasants” due to the very popular …show more content…

In the Middle Ages life for kings was spectacular because they barely had to do anything unlike the peasants who had to work all day. The king held all the power in the village and was the governor of the village. Since the king was the most powerful person in the village he was at the top of the feudal pyramid because he was the most important person and had the most power. The kings “were usually lords that leased the land because they were wealthy”(Medieval Life—Feudalism). The king also decided who and when he would lease the unused land to and the person or people had to be people that he could trust. This is why the king didn 't lease land to peasants because he couldn 't trust them and they didn 't have enough money to pay him for the taxes for the land that they work on. The king also “held all the power and owned all the land in the village”(Park 6). Every time someone wanted to buy land from the king they had to “say and oath to the king”(Medieval Life—Feudalism). Also the people that owned land in the village had to pay taxes to the king every once and awhile so they could stay on the land. The reason the feudal pyramid is thin at the top and big at the bottom is because since there were not a lot of Kings the Kings section was small but since 90% of the population was peasants it was bigger at the bottom. Almost always the Kings had a very powerful life but had some

Show More
Related
957 Words | 4 Pages

Man’s view of the world changed greatly in a blink of an eye during the Renaissance, and for good reasons. The Middle Ages (which stretched from about 500 CE to 1350 CE), were a time of little schools, widespread illiteracy, and the Catholic Church ruling everything in Europe, meaning almost everyone had to look up to them to explain the world. During this time period, many of the population were peasant farmers named serfs under the rule of a lord who they worked for. However, At the backend of this period, the world started to change. Improved farming methods meant serfs depended less on their lords, meaning they could gain freedom and migrate to different towns to do different jobs such as being a banker or merchant.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

They had the least wealth and respect but without them the two kingdoms couldn’t continue. There were three sub-categories of peasants in both societies: Farmers were the wealthiest peasants as they had their own land where they would dwell and also harvest crops to sell to the rest of the kingdom. The craftsmen/artisans were the second wealthiest peasants. They would craft armour and weapons and make work with metal and wood. The merchants were the least wealthy of all the peasants because they were completely dependent on other people to give them work.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

The Middle Ages were a time where kings and nobles owned the land and serfs worked with little pay. Serfs were like slaves that worked on a farm (Doc. 1). They got one day to farm for themselves and the other six they were working for their king or noble (OI). Nobles and kings had knights called vassals (OI). Vassals were knights who protected and served kings and nobles in exchange for land (OI).

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

Feudalism is a system of governing and landholding. Nobles were able to use land that belonged to the king and in return, the nobles pledged their loyalty and military services to them ( doc 1 ). The feudal system was based on rights and obligations. The manor was the economic side of the feudal system. The manor was a system where the lord’s lands was taken care of by his serfs ( doc 2 ).

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

In the Middle Ages, the power of people impacted the society, because of the Feudal System. In other words, the rankings of people. There were four groups. The Kings and Queens were at the top, then the nobles, the knights, and last peasants and serfs(Doc. 1). Serfs and peasants had very little land given and they even had to provide food that they farmed for the knights and nobles.

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

The Middle Ages was a period that lasted from about 500 to 1500(OI). There were kings and queens, nobles, knights, and peasants (Doc. 1). People were treated and respected differently according to their class(OI). There were special relationships and responsibilities that everyone had. In the Middle Ages feudalism affected people’s lives economically, socially, and politically.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

The king allowed nobles to have authority over peasants, not only that but the nobles had the choice to do military service; unlike the peasants who had no choice. The king exempt nobles from most taxes, and allowed nobles to collect tolls from people using roads and markets. This allowed many nobles and clergy to live in great luxury chateaux and palaces. Another thing that made the peasants angry was the yearly incomes, the Archbishop of Paris was making 50,000 livres and Marquis de Mannevillette was making 20,000 livres. Meanwhile a typical village priest was making 750 livres and a master carpenter made 200 livres, specifically you can see the yearly income and compare it your self.

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction From 700 A.D to 1400 A.D, feudalism was the way society was ruled. God and the king had all the power during the Middle Ages. Peasants and serfs were the lowest class. Your family history and wealth determined your class level.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

However, this could be better seen in their form of government. Feudalism was a system that had land owners at the top (Kings and lords) and those who worked the land and keep the community safe at the bottom. It was basically impossible to move between social classes, and a desire to keep the rich with the rich meant that one couldn’t marry into money It was a social, economic, political, and legal system that stood in place for hundreds of years. The system, however meant that the government was weak, and it rarely stretched far; the larger the kingdom, the harder it was to keep it working. It also meant there were a lot of poor people living in the fifteen hundreds.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

They had more money and there were fewer limits on social mobility. The nobility did not want peasants to have these privileges and passed laws to keep the lower class people from rising into the higher classes. These laws were called sumptuary laws and they controlled what clothes peasants were allowed to wear so they couldn’t act a higher

Read More
1760 Words | 8 Pages

83 Yet such equal division of family lands among the testator 's heirs was not generally the practice in late-medieval England, being in fact comparatively rare, and it is just as likely that the Wealden houses were an expression, once again, of the exceptional energy of the peasant land-accumulators whose exploitation of land surpluses following the Black Death had raised them up into a new yeomanry. It was men of this class who, when the time came, were both ready and willing to take on the leases of the archbishop of Canterbury 's demesnes, and although some were required, by the terms of their leases, to keep the old manorial buildings in repair, most would have accepted only what they needed of those buildings, preferring for themselves the modern timber-built farmhouses which they could now very obviously afford. https://www.questiaschool.com/read/109070648/medieval-england-a-social-history-and-archaeology Analysis: Serfs were not immune to the Black death, impacted economy Peasants were unhappy with the rights, caused rebellion / land hungry

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

Think of kings like modern-day judges for the people in his kingdom. In fact, this job was so important that the king's role in administering justice medieval society that law and order began to fall apart whenever the king was away from his own land for a long period of time. The nobles relied on the king to resolve their disagreements; because he was the only person they would accept a

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

“What goes around comes around” -Eddie Stone I’ve heard the saying “what goes around comes around” many times throughout my life. I first heard it in the song by Justin Timberlake that came out some years ago, however, the quote originates from Eddie Stone in a book that he wrote in 1974. I remember one time when I was younger, I had went with my mom to Hollister and there was lip gloss laying in a chair and I took it.

Read More

More about Feudal System: Life In The Middle Ages

Open Document