Final Test History of Rock & Roll 1. When I think about Keith Richards' claim that just ten percent of rock and roll is "good," I find myself somewhat agreeing. While the amount may vary based on personal preference and interpretation, it is evident that a large chunk of the genre comprises substandard or forgettable content. However, I believe that the proportion of "good" music in Rock & Roll is more than 10%, maybe closer to 20% or 30%. The fundamental criteria for determining whether a certain performer or song is "good" or "bad" in Rock & Roll are subjective, but some elements stand out. First and foremost, musical ability and expertise are required. A technically excellent performance, inventive instrumentation, and captivating melodies may all contribute to a song's quality. Second, genuineness and authenticity play a vital role. Genuine passion and genuine expression connect with listeners, distinguishing outstanding songs from cheap …show more content…
Rock & roll is centred on rebellion against authority, independence, and a sense of freedom. Artists that represent this approach question society conventions, push limits, and express themselves truthfully. Furthermore, Rock & Roll values raw energy, emotion, and sincerity while rejecting pretence and artificiality. It is about making a visceral connection with audiences and speaking truth to power. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? The 1960s surely left an indelible mark on rock and roll, defining its forms, styles, ideologies, and images for decades to come. Cultural upheaval, social activity, and musical invention dominated the era, all of which had a major impact on the course of Rock & Roll. The countercultural attitude of the 1960s, defined by a rejection of mainstream ideals and a desire for personal independence, is still present in Rock & Roll's ethos of rebellion and self-expression