ipl-logo

Forms Of Government: Unitary, Confederate, And Federal

694 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Aspects of the checks and balances

There are many forms of government , all having advantages and disadvantages. Some examples of government include Unitary, Confederate, and Federal. These three forms of government all have their pros and cons.

A unitary form of government is a sovereign state governed as a single entity. Some advantages that come along with this form of government involve the citizens feeling a sense of belonging. Which inspires patriotism, since all states have things in common. Which means that all laws are the same for the whole nation, and no state is better than the other. Changes are also able to happen very quickly since there is only one branch of power. "Management is also very simple since all of the laws that involve things like taxes are …show more content…

Some advantages that are included in this form of government are that each region or province are all equal to each other, as well as all the states act as the decision-making part of the government, conversely to a unitary government. This reduces the risk of “becoming a tyranny or dominant union” (“Confederacy”). However, a confederacy also has some disadvantages, such as they do not last long since it is considered decentralized, which makes it an unpopular form of government. Also, since each state has authority, there is a struggle for political power. “States would also have a great possibility to become secessionists which may lead to the conflict among the Confederacy” (“Confederacy”). And lastly, “The central government becomes a weak institution as the authority comes from the states. In fact, the member states should have the majority of the legislative authority” (“Confederacy”). Which means that it leaves the center unable to make or enforce …show more content…

Some advantages of a federalist government are that they consist of smaller branches of local governments which are located in the middle of the local society, which makes it easier to deal with things that need to be changed. This form of government also includes the system of checks and balances which make it so that one body of government is unable to have more power than the others. Also, smaller local governments are included in a federalist government, which allows the citizens to feel more involved in the decisions of their government. However, there are also disadvantages that come with a federalist government, such as a struggle for power between the two bodies in charge. “This can cause things like strikes and make the government much less effective than it could normally be” (Lombardo). Also, “With the responsibility of the government being shared, it becomes very easy for one sector to release responsibility for the other” (Lombardo). And Since two bodies are fighting against each other, many things result in a compromise on important problems. “Compromise, while sometimes a good thing, when you are dealing with life changing and vital policies, compromises will just not cut it”

Show More
Related
1040 Words | 5 Pages

In other words, Federalism is power not held by the people being split into two; that is the powers of the central and state governments. Some of the powers given to the central government were the ability to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, declare war and to print and coin money which created the national currency (Document A). Meanwhile, some powers given to the state were ones such as the ability to hold elections, establish schools and pass marriage and divorce laws (Document A). This compound government instills a double-security for the people within the nation because this method works so that the central and state governments could check each other’s power while still being able to independently control itself. Federalism protects from tyranny by making sure that power isn’t only vested by the government, but also by the people of

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism guards against tyranny, so does the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each guard in different, unique ways. All of them do the same job to guard against tyranny. Federalism divides the government into the state and central governments. The division of powers gives each branch of government equal power, while checks and balances allows each branch to check each other.

Read More
336 Words | 2 Pages

This is superior to having a strong central government like the union because the needs of individual states are more easily managed. For example; all states have different ideals, populations

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

This keeps any tyranny from happening in light of the fact that the states can't take control of central forces, and the central government can't take control of state forces. They can just take the force given and the forces they

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

“James Madison’s idea of the division of power between central and state governments is known as federalism.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788) The state governments have the power to make local decisions such as establishing schools, passing marriage and divorce laws, and to hold elections. Whereas the central government has the power to make decisions that affect the country such as, to provide an army and navy, set up post offices, and regulate trade. As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism is a fair way to divide powers, so that one group or person would not have more power than the rest when they are building and enforcing laws. This is reliable because federalism equally shares the powers. Therefore, it would not be biased while constructing the laws since everyone would have a say, unlike if one ruler would have all the

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The states can not affect the central government because all the decisions affect the state not the central

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

With the state governments having more power, there was no order in the country. Every state had different laws, taxes, court systems, and currencies, so it was like each state was its own individual country. When the national government had more power, the country was more organized and unified because everyone followed the same laws, had most of the same taxes, had one national court system, and all had the same type of currency. The country was also somewhat more equal because each state had an equal number of representatives in the government. Federalists were happy with the decision to pass the Constitution because they supported it, while the anti-federalists were unhappy because they were against it.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

A federalist government is one with a Central government and many smaller state governments. This was an effective way to prevent tyranny because Central government still had power, but the States still could control their respective state. There is venn diagram in

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

The powers given to the states include: setting up local governments, establishing schools, holding elections, passing marriage and divorce laws, and regulating in state business. Federalism gives the states and the central government equal power to guard against tyranny. Another reason why it guards against tyranny is separation of power.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

By using checks and balances in the Legislative Branch to makes sure there is equal likeness for all the states. For example, dividing the power between central and state government can help regulate trade, conduct foreign relations and declare war. While the state can set up local governments, hold elections and establish schools. The central and state governments have enough separate power so they don’t struggle to control everything. The central government has enough power to help the country’s major needs while the state government has enough power to help the state’s that are in need.

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

10, advises that perhaps one of the foremost arguments that promotes the Constitution as the premier form of government, in countering the Anti-Federalist ideas, is the argument that a national, federal system is the best way to fight the factional elements found within. The representative government outlined in the Constitution, such that the citizens elect representatives who then vote and create law with the citizens’ best interest at the fore, is a much better alternative to the states current situation, that of broken unification and growing dissent. As opposed to direct democracy, where every citizen is involved directly in the law making process, is already at the outset not set up for success, because the aforementioned factions will form majorities and vote on law as best suited for themselves, and the minorities end up with no say or voice in the law-making process. Though factions are almost a given in any democracy, a strong, federal government that backs up the states will have much more power to quell any factional attempt to form majorities that until now the disenfranchised states had no power to

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

They believed that the organization of a new government would reduce the effects of political factions. They also pointed out that the great advantage of a federal system was to create a “happy combination” of a national government that is too large for any single faction to control. Also, it would create several state government that would be smaller and be responsive to local matters. They also stated that the proposed federal government separation of powers will stop any branch from violating the citizen’s right or taking over the national

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

This form of government gives congress advisory powers rather than coercive. ++The second possible form of government is to remove the federal state governments and instead unite the states to form

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Forms Of Government: Unitary, Confederate, And Federal

Related Topics

Open Document