ipl-logo

Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay

667 Words3 Pages

Following the wake of the Orlando nightclub shooting-- a travesty that shook the LGBTQ+ community-- Lin-Manuel Miranda stated, “Love is love is love is love is love” during his Tony’s acceptance speech. The opposition toward marriage equality demonstrates that, for some, love only loves when it involves a heterosexual couple. Same-sex marriage is one of the most contentious and heavily debated issues today. Before same-sex marriage was legalized, states were divided on whether it should be legalized, and this difference in opinion extended to the US public. Opponents of legal same-sex marriage argue that gay marriage conflicts with religious beliefs and traditional definitions of marriage. Consistent with the arguments of gay marriage supporters, people, regardless of sexual orientation, should not be barred from marriage because homosexual people deserve the same rights as heterosexual people do; the denial of these constitutional and basic human rights is discriminatory. Homosexual people shouldn’t be barred from marriage because heterosexual and homosexual people deserve the same rights. Being deprived of these rights is a form of discriminations and causes …show more content…

The Bible condemns it and marriage is for the procreation of men and women. The Bible is also very outdated and an old book shouldn’t be used to justify discrimination. The Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Separation of Church and State). This means for the church to stay out of any state business. Especially, with same-sex marriage, many that are against it believe that it's a sin in their religion. Since some believe that gay marriage is morally wrong and it opposes nature, it isn’t following the traditional marriage, which again is completely outdated and shouldn’t be held against

Show More
Related
155 Words | 1 Pages

There is discrimination in this world to this day, there is discriminations against “people who are gay”. This discrimination is just like the Holocaust, because the Germans didn’t like the jews. I believe the gay marriage should have been approved long before it was. People need to realize judging someone because they are gay is wrong, that person is obviously an idiot. It is not up to people to judge other people because they are gay.

Read More
1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

This analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

Hodges (2015): In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether the Fourteenth Amendment requires states and their departments to recognize Same-Sex marriage. In a 5-4 ruling, the court found that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry since it is one of the protected fundamental liberties. Additionally, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right of same-sex couples to marry. The Court also held that the First Amendment protects the rights of religious organizations to adhere to their principles, but it does not allow states to deny same-sex couples the right to

Read More
1768 Words | 8 Pages

Same-sex marriages can help add more money to the wedding industry, it can help decrease cost of state benefits, it can add more revenue to the whole state, denying them the right to marry goes against the fourteenth amendment, it would be the right source of action since they face discrimination, denying someone the right to marry means that you are denying them happiness, religious leaders support it because it bring peace in the communities, they support it because they see everyone as God’s children and they support it because, in the bible, the term marriage meant just between two women and the term didn’t regard to gender. Same-sex marriages can very important essence to help boost the economy because it can help during times when a state is going through a crisis like they don’t have a lot of employment. Don’t have funds to improve communities or it can help the entire country fund into healthcare, education and---- which can improve some nay lives. Allowing a ban on same-sex marriage is a bad example towards the next generations of children. It’s teaching them that it’s ok to discriminate certain people.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

if people were denied the right to marry it is discrimination and created a second class of citizens (Gay Marriage ProCon.org, ProConorg Headlines.). The concept of “traditional marriage” has changed over time and the definition of marriage being between a man and a woman inaccurate (Gay Marriage ProCon.org, ProConorg Headlines.). Gay marriages bring financial aid to the federal, state, and local governments, and can boost the economy in a major way (Gay Marriage ProCon.org, ProConorg

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

Those who go by the living constitution approach agree that marriage cannot be denied to gay people because the

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

Alas, in America laws are not applied to only the directly affected, but to a whole, governed body. That leaves the issue of whether homosexual marriage should be recognized as a federal or state issue. Republicans demand that according to the 10th amendment -the federal government’s power is dictated only by what is in the Constitution, all other power is given to the people and the states- it is a state’s right to recognize or nullify a marriage. If one wished to continue to read past the 10th amendment, they would inevitably skim the 14th, which limits the state’s power to not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” or ” deprive any person of life, liberty, or property”. To deny a person a lawfully protected marriage is to breach the clearly recorded rights preserved by the 14th amendment.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Nothing should dictate what a human being’s heart desires. If a citizen in the United States enjoys the freedoms the United States ensures, then they should be able to pick their desires in marriage without boundaries. If a person wishes to abide by what is considered orthodox in their culture, be it heterosexual marriage or polygamy, then that is purely their choice and should not be influenced by others. Moreover for homosexual marriage. And individual’s choice to marry a person of the same sex is their own, and it should not be bound by guidelines others consider to be

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

Some people believe marriage should remain “traditional” - between a man and a woman. They also believe that LGBTQ+ couples shouldn’t adopt, serve in the military, or have protections against

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Considering the political issues today same-sex marriage controversy serves to be significant as it has not been able to reach its height at the national level. As only 36 states out of 50 legally approve of same-sex marriage (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Amending the Constitution for same-sex marriage serves to be a huge controversy and a difficult process due to many opinions present within the political and social circuit. Another reason many citizens do not support the idea of same-sex marriage is due to traditional social beliefs and morals. For example, many Americans oppose the idea of same-sex marriage on religious grounds.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

I started talking to you back in December. You solicited me. It’s funny, my dorm friend had brought you up. We started with other stuff. I kept getting calls from a girl I had just broken up with, so we talked about that.

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

Marriage is a human right for all people. People in the past and present have been denied this right simply because their skin color or their sexual orientation. Throughout history the definition of marriage has changed. For example, marriage used to be between couples of the same race, they could not be an interracial couple because if they were they could not marry. Marriage was also considered a union between a man and a woman.

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Marriage is a contract between two people and honestly I think that the society should not be interfering this bond. Not permitting the right to marry another human is a severe violation of the human rights and freedom. James Carville “I was against gay marriage until I realized that I didn’t have one.” The statement is self-explanatory: “You don’t get to judge because you don’t have the

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

Marriage has been a part of life since before the medieval times. For two individuals who adore each other and arrangement on spending whatever remains of their lives together, the usual impulse is to make it legitimate and get hitched. This being said same-sex marriage had been broadly talked about and bantered on if it ought to be sanctioned or not. It is segregating not to permit two individuals who need to get hitched because they are a gay person. Authorizing same-sex marriage would perceive the American long for equal rights for all.

Read More

More about Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document