ipl-logo

Gayle S. Trotter Gun Control Laws

621 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Conclucion essayon the second amendment

How are anti-gun taxes helping lower gun violence. More than 200 years ago in 1791, the founders of the United States wrote, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, must not be violated." This is the Second Amendment, stating that American citizens have the right to self-protection and safety. People should be able to carry firearms because you have the right to defend your life, and guns help with that. The founding fathers understood that having to defend yourself was necessary as a free society. In 2008, the Supreme Court stated that the Second Amendment specifically protects people’s right to own a gun for protection. This means that every citizen has …show more content…

The article, Testimony of Gayle S. Trotter, says, Anti-gun legislation keeps guns away from the mentally stable and law obedient, but it does not keep guns out of the hands of criminals. This is because regulation only affects the guns of the good citizens. Criminals will not be affected with the anti-gun taxes because criminals don 't listen to the law. More than 20,000 anti-gun laws are in effect throughout the United States. But these laws don 't do anything to help lower violent crimes. Wayne Lapierre, the CEO of the N.R.A., says that, All anti-gun laws do is put the innocent at the mercy of the lawless. In addition, President Barack Obama announced in 2013,that there 's not a single law, no set of laws that can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society. Even the president of the United States understands that gun laws don’t affect violent criminals. Despite this, gun control advocates say the recent shootings prove that the gun laws are way too weak. However, nearly all shootings have happened in no-gun zones. This is because violent shooters know that people in gun-free zones don’t have any fire-arms , meaning they can’t protect themselves. It’s pretty obvious that guns are the most reliable means of defense, and give people the chance to protect themselves from violent attackers and not get as hurt. All anti-gun laws do is take away the protection of citizens by disarming them, putting them in

Show More
Related
351 Words | 2 Pages

”gun control laws do not deter crimes and gun related crimes”(procon.org)If we have gun control laws it can make us feel more unsafe because if someone comes into a house and threatens them and they don't have gun to protect themselves with then they can die or be severely injured(John R Lot Ethos-There should be no gun control laws.gun control laws violate the rights of the american people.” the second amendment

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

The Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States clearly states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Obama’s effort to enforce this amendment may leave America in a frantic position. Stricter gun laws would not benefit America because they would restrict the rights of citizens, restrict the reliability and freedom citizens deserve, and would do nothing to prevent killings from occurring. Recently, laws have been established within states that mistreat

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

Making it to where people can’t have gun honestly makes them want them even more. For instance when a mother tells a child then can’t do something that makes them want to do it even more than before, so therefore why do they think making laws about guns will make the crime go down. Honestly

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

After all, the second amendment states everyone has the right to bear arms and should not be infringed. 30,000 people are killed each year by firearms, and in order to lower this number I strongly believe a potent system needs to be put intact for everyone who wishes to obtain a gun. Although it has been shown time after time that nearly anyone can get their hands on a firearm no matter what laws are in effect. While researching about gun control laws and its pros and cons, I came across an article discussing how these laws will not prevent criminals from killing. Out of the 62 mass shootings in the U.S. between 1982 and 2012, 49 of the killers legally obtained the firearm they used.

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

(Kleck, Kovandzic and Bellows, Does Gun Control Reduce Violent Crime?) Among all these different studies, as well as the different aspects that have to be considered when analyzing the data, there is not enough strong evidence to support that gun control laws reduce violent gun crimes. Strong supporting evidence produced by Kovandzic, Marvell, and Vierait in 2005, whose panel data was pertained to 189 large cities from 1980 to 2000, used city data that did not influence the county crime rates. They found that Right to Carry (RTC) laws have no real significant effect on violent crime rates.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Several anti-gun advocates such as myself fail to acknowledge the fact that Americans have used firearms to stop over a million crimes from getting committed each year. Several pro-gun advocates believe that the more gun laws that get enacted, the less law abiding tax paying citizens are to use them to protect

Read More
1389 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control has decreases the amount of gun violence in the United States. But if you think about it, if there is gun control or not criminals will always find a way to get a gun. The problem is that criminals can get guns. Everyone else can have gun and be fine as long as they know to use it properly and safely. All it takes is a little knowledge in firearms and then people will be smarter about everything.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

One benefit of tighter gun control laws is fewer mass shootings. “Lack of data” is commonly used as the reason politicians refuse to strengthen gun laws (Hughes and Bryant, A9). However, there is data out there that proves gun control laws will help. “Following tragedies such as the killings in Parkland, Las Vegas, and Sandy Hook, gun apologists are fond of saying that stricter laws wouldn’t have prevented the carnage. Yet we can easily see that this claim was false in Parkland” (Hughes and Bryant, A9).

Read More
352 Words | 2 Pages

Despite all the talk of gun violence that would make it seem like there were high rates of it, it has surprisingly gone down in the past decades. Since after President Bush’s agenda changed in 2006, the number of people prosecuted for gun using during a crime has gone down. (Novak). Gun control only puts law abiding citizens at a disadvantage. Many criminals already get their guns illegally and still find a way to get their hands on them.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

There is support and opposition to gun control. President Barack Obama would like to introduce laws that are newer and stricter for the owners of guns and those wishing to own guns. The faction of republicans that split from the others suggested that the frequent shootings spread their roots in laxer law enforcement environments, so the key is to be step up law enforcement. The government proposed to establish better limitations on guns, instead of banning them

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

But the connection between guns and violence is not as simple as “guns cause crime” or “guns make us safer.” There is scientific evidence that some policies, such as restricting high risk individuals (such as felons and spouse abusers) from access to firearms, will reduce, but not

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Although the second amendment states all americans have the right to bear arms crime statistics show that we need tighter gun control to lessen the widespread shootings. Gun violence has existed in america

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Some would argue that America needs stricter gun control laws to decrease violence. However, strong enforcement of the current laws will ensure the safety of

Read More
1143 Words | 5 Pages

Guns can be a very strong deterrent against crime as evidenced by a survey in which “56 percent of felons across 10 state prisons said they would not attack a potential victim known to be armed”( Washington post 2). This information helps to support the fact that allowing citizens to be armed does not lead to an increase in crime but instead can actually lead to a noticeable decrease in crime. Simply allowing a citizen to be armed can prevent roughly 56 percent of felons from attacking them. Along with this “half the top 10 states with the lowest gun-death rates (per 100,00 residents here) have less-restrictive gun laws”( Washington Post 2). The fact that half the top 10 states with the lowest number of gun deaths per 100,00 people have less restrictive gun laws supports that an increase in gun control regulations would not mean there would be a decrease in crime.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.

Read More

More about Gayle S. Trotter Gun Control Laws

Open Document