Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control u.s
Gun conrol in the u.s essay
US gun control decrease crime rate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control u.s
Gun conrol in the u.s essay
US gun control decrease crime rate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In dealing with gun control, Peggy Noonan in her article “The Culture of Death – And of Disdain” takes a different approach than James Q. Wilson in his article “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer”, although both articles also share similar qualities. Throughout her article, Noonan primarily appeals to pathos by means of emotional exhortations and strong diction, as well as by repeating personal pronouns and recalling experiences. She also appeals to ethos with calls to action and moral statements. Her overall structure includes a great amount of figurative language, including an extended metaphor, repetition, alliteration, and multiple allusions. By doing this, she creates an extremely impassioned and urgent tone to explain how each individual should take
I have always been a proponent of stricter gun control policies. However, my position is not fed by the fact that I am not a gun owner; I know a number of people who own guns, from muskets to semi-automatic rifles like the Colt LE6920, who, like me, are of the opinion that the country, in the wake of the recent mass shootings, should take a more radical approach to the problem of guns. Apparently, my stance on the issue has relatively been biased. Upon going through some of the principal arguments by those in opposition as listed on the Procon.org website, I have found myself looking at the gun policy issue quite differently. I particularly found these three anti-gun policy arguments to be intriguing: gun ownership, not gun control laws, deters crime; gun control laws cannot deter criminals from obtaining guns; and the laws are unnecessary since markedly few people are killed by guns.
“A study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that "legal purchase of a handgun appears to be associated with a long-lasting increased risk of violent death"(-https://gun-control.procon.org/). There is such a thing as an unlicensed dealer selling handguns without a background check and proper documentation and it is legal. Those gun buyers are mainly causing chaos with mass shootings and yet others think the Second Amendment defends the right to own a weapon for “self-defense”. It is time for tougher gun control laws; the safety of the citizens depends on a safe environment free of guns from those using them for villainous purposes such as mass shootings or homicides.
Gun control decrease crime. The gun control law should be more strict because it would decrease murders rates, and there would be less killing. There should be more law about gun control from the government. The United States needs strict law of owning a gun. There should be laws that will keep people away from guns.
Gun control laws interfere with the right to have a gun and smudge the people’s feelings and rights of safety. According the the NRA guns are used for self defense around 2.5 million times a year. Many people surveyed have stated, “the police can’t be everywhere every minute of the day to protect us from the dangers”(ProConorg Headlines). 61% of the men surveyed by the Pew Research foundation have concluded that harsher gun laws would make it very hard and difficult to protect their families and homes.
Adolf Hitler has said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm the citizens.” Gun Control is wrong and should not be set into action. First and foremost, if guns were to be banned, criminals would still get their hands on them, leaving law abiding citizens defenseless against illegally armed criminals. For instance, drugs are illegal but that does not stop criminals from making, selling and buying them; it is a big problem in today’s society. Secondly, thorough background checks don’t allow felons to purchase weapons, making their only option to steal one, which is much harder and much more risky.
But for gun enthusiast laws and preventions are an infringement on their freedom and rights. As the Second Amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” According to Larry Harris in the Huffpost (Harris 2017) gun advocates say that citizens need the right to be armed to protect the country and that citizens need to own a gun for self-protection as it is stated in the Second
Gun control laws should keep guns from going into the wrong hands. However, the United States should not ban guns completely because its ones right to own one. Americans have a tendency to think that owning a gun is a necessary because American society has embedded guns to be part of our culture. Media makes it seem that we must own a gun for our safety. Guns are always displayed on television shows, movies, and video games where masses of people or “monsters” are killed.
One of the most debated and intense arguments is the issue on gun control and gun policies. Gun control and gun rights is always an emotional topic that has been fought in the political arena for many years, especially during presidential elections. Gun control proponents want to see all guns extinguished and they believe that guns are a key problem to crime, but gun rights advocates believe that the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Gun control is not the solution to limiting or restricting crime. First off, I want to go over the fact that most criminals usually don’t get their guns legally and that by putting forth a law it would not guarantee lower crime rates.
These laws infringe upon the second amendment, which states ‘‘A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed’’ (Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, Taft-Hartley Act). If gun control laws were put into place across the nation, Americans would no longer have a militia if it was ever needed. By examining the issues surrounding gun control it is clear that prohibiting guns is not the answer to stopping violent crimes from happening; it only restricts law abiding citizens from protecting themselves. “Of 62 mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and 2012, 49 of the shooters used legally obtained guns.
“Anybody who's in favor of gun control is a fucking moron.” Jackie Mason. The preservation of the second amendment is imperative in order for law abiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals and the threat of a tyrannical government. Advocates for gun control use gun violence as their defense asking the government to protect them in the name of public safety. Even though some people believe gun control will improve public safety, gun control hinders public safety and protects the government because gun control does not deter the criminal use of firearms and gun control equals absolute despotism.
In the wake of the mass shooting at a Florida high school the question of gun control has surfaced again. There are two sides of the question, one side proposes that restrictions are placed on guns while the other side believes it is our constitutional right to bear firearms. People that want stricter gun control laws believe it will help reduce crime. Those against gun control believe that owning a gun will help stop crime. Every citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who want to harm them.
About 67% of that 42% claim they own guns for protection reasons (Americans’ Views on Guns). Many people in the United States argue that the control regulations already in place need to become
Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.
The majority of Americans that are against stringent gun laws in the U.S. say guns are more widely used in self-defense and that they discourage criminals from committing violent crimes (Celinska, 234). There are two main purposes for owning guns, defense and recreation. Hunters for example would be against gun laws because they use guns for recreational shooting and hunting. Also people that might have grown up in a gun free environment or an antigun culture maybe through higher education would see gun control as more achievable. “Guns don’t kill, people do” according to the NRA and criminals don’t obey laws (Gregg, 68).