Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control pro and cons
Summary of public policy of gun control
Gun control pro and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control pro and cons
Summary of public policy of gun control
Gun control pro and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
stricter gun laws are not needed in the united states. One argument is , if guns were outlawed criminals would still find ways to arm themselves. Gun control laws won’t stop mass shootings. Most shootings are from criminals that want to kill people like gangs kill people because they don't give them the drugs.
Owning guns or banning them is a highly controversial topic in the United States today. Everytime, there is a mass shooting or violence commited the issue resurfaces. The real question is should the government make strict gun control laws and legislations? Would it help to decrease the crime rate or will it be the opposite effect? The nation is divided on this issue, some believe there should be bans on guns some think there shouldn't be any.
Guns has been responsible for over 4,000 death just within two months of 2018. There should be stricter laws on buying guns. People who own guns should take more responsibility in keeping them safe and lock up. I think there should be stricter rules on buying guns and owning guns to keep the public safe. There are arguments that disagree with gun violence and that banning firearms will not solve anything.
If you recollect about it, this really should be an anticipated effect of gun control, though most people don 't remember far enough past the words "gun" and "control" to see it. When you do give up and recollect about it though, the criminals who are committing crimes at present are the ones still making this a relevant issue of discussion in the foremost position. They are the aces who are either getting access to certain weapons that are already illegal and/or the ones who are using legal weapons illegally. If it weren 't for them disregarding laws and causing these crime rates to fail up, gun control would not still be in
Therefore, the law needs to improve. In the present time, gun control laws are the much crime, the laws have to be changed so that it will be much easier for everyone to live without being afraid. Keeping guns away from people will reduce the amount of death each year. My first reason on why gun control should be strict is because there are massive shooting going on around the world these days. Few months back there is a terrorist attack in Paris, many people were harm and some innocent citizen were even killed by the attack.
Guns are responsible for thousands of deaths in the United States annually. I don’t think the answer to this problem is to ban guns in all, but to have stricter laws that make
The implementation of stricter gun laws will not terminate crime. Washington, D.C. has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, yet it is one of the most dangerous places in the country to live. Criminals that seek to harm others do not obey laws. Changing the laws of a country or the making of new ones does not get rid of the problem. Adding more rules and regulations could create larger problems that do not involve guns, but instead, other types of weapons.
The enforcement of stricter gun control laws would be extremely beneficial for the safety of the people in the United States. Stricter gun control laws would ensure guns do not fall in the hands of people who would misuse them. For example, individuals who are 21-years-old and below should not have the right to own or be around guns. For if they cannot legally drink alcohol, how can the authorities trust them with a weapon that can easily take a life within seconds. Furthermore, stricter gun control laws could make sure that people go through a proper psyche evaluation before they can obtain the right to own a gun.
The issue with implanting strict gun control regulations in our society is that people will become vulnerable targets for criminals. Criminals will continue to conduct harmful crimes, despite the laws, and law-abiding citizens won’t have the necessary weapons needed to successfully defend themselves. For instance, “59% of the burglaries in Britain, which has tough gun control laws, are ‘hot burglaries’ which are burglaries committed while the home is occupied by the owner/renter. By contrast, the U.S., with more lenient gun control laws, has a ‘hot burglary’ rate of only 13%” (“Crimes and Guns”). The implementation of gun control laws will thus increase crime rates as people will become vulnerable targets for criminals.
A man killed 27 children in an elementary sure the gun was the weapon but it wasn't the cause it was the man who pulled the trigger and fired. and even though that the gun ownership has doubled in the twentieth century the kill rate has decreased. more laws wouldn't stop people
Some say that improving gun control would reduce the amount of guns and keep our country safer. Between 1999 and 2013, there were 464,033 total gun deaths: 270,237 suicides; 174,773 homicides;and 9,983 unintentional deaths. Although those are big numbers, they could have been easily prevented. 48% of convicted felons that were surveyed on May 9th, 2013 admitted that they avoided committing crimes when they knew the victim was armed with a gun. Therefore if there was less gun control, citizens would be able to protect themselves if there would be a need to.
On average 96 Americans are killed with guns every day and more than 100,000 people in America are shot in murders. We must need Gun Control. The one who is a con for Gun Control says “If gun control laws were made much more strict, these criminals would still be able to obtain illegal weapons. The only difference would be that the people who are not criminals would not have the ability to defend themselves” but if we eliminate the gun control, the murder case will increase greatly.
While I used a more philosophical way to answer the question in the title, the article itself is filled with data tables that provide similar answers. Gun control has a negligible effect on gun crime itself. If you make obtaining a weapon difficult, people will turn to illegal methods to obtain a weapon when living in an area plagued by crime. Thereby increasing gun crime to a point where more gun control is being issued. The data in this article proves that gun control laws do relatively nothing in solving this
Although gun control in some states does lower gun deaths, it does not deter gun crime. Gun control would take away safety and a way to protect yourself. More gun laws are not needed because of how
Every year, guns are used over 80 times more often to protect a life than to take one. Gun control has been a highly controversial issue in the U.S. for at least the past decade. From assassinations to mass shootings, every time guns and violence come together the issue resurfaces. So the big question, would new gun laws help or hurt our crime rate in the U.S.? The nation stands divided on this issue with both sides taking a firm position on what they believe.