In dealing with gun control, Peggy Noonan in her article “The Culture of Death – And of Disdain” takes a different approach than James Q. Wilson in his article “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer”, although both articles also share similar qualities. Throughout her article, Noonan primarily appeals to pathos by means of emotional exhortations and strong diction, as well as by repeating personal pronouns and recalling experiences. She also appeals to ethos with calls to action and moral statements. Her overall structure includes a great amount of figurative language, including an extended metaphor, repetition, alliteration, and multiple allusions. By doing this, she creates an extremely impassioned and urgent tone to explain how each individual should take …show more content…
He focuses his article on why gun control should not be the response rather than providing insight for how to prevent future issues. Nevertheless, there are many parallels and similarities between the two articles. Both take an anti-gun control standpoint and emphasize the impact of modern culture on violence. Furthermore, they both explain the benefits of guns for civilians as personal defense. Stylistically, both use rhetorical questions, stand-alone sentences, and great syntax variation. Each author also alludes to specific and recent tragedies in order to evoke emotion and appeal to pathos. They both also include strong diction in order to intensify the atrocity of the tragedies. Peggy Noonan, in her article “The Culture of Death – And of Disdain” and Cynthia Tucker, in her article “As I See It” take opposing viewpoints; however, they both also contain overlapping elements. They both craft their arguments with the dominant appeal of pathos by means of vivid negative diction in order to heighten the emotional response of the