ipl-logo

Group Process And Synergistic Decision Making

946 Words4 Pages

Reflection of Module 1
I will be discussing What is Group Process and my different role(s) within the group(s) during in-class exercises. I will also discuss Reflective thinking process and Synergistic Decision Making.
Group Process
As described by the article What is Group Process, (Perlmutter, J. 2018). Group Process is when we observe how a group handles its communication and relationships while the group works. Dimension of Group Process include Participation, Influence, Style of Influence, Decision Making Procedures, Membership, Feelings, Norms, Maintenance Functions, Emotional Issues.
Participation can be observed as high or low based on the involvement of verbal participation. (Perlmutter, J. 2018, P. 1). During the Desert …show more content…

This process emphasizes the left-brain functions such as rational or logical thinking and forces you to step back and think about how to solve the problem. There are six basic components; define the problem, analyze the cause, identify criteria, generation solutions, select a solution, implement a solution.
I have applied this information into my professional career, I recently evaluated situations work to determine if I reacted to the immediate need/problem instead of taking a step back to identify the root cause and to generating a long-term solution. After further discussing a few situations with my manager, we both agreed the initial reaction was necessary to support another department however, I should analyze the situation and its root cause to generate a long-term solution. Before knowledge obtained from this course, I would have continued reacting to the immediate need without further examining, identifying the problem and generate and implement a …show more content…

We approached the situation with an assumption that walking was the only course of action and failed to explore other alternative courses of action. Our group had members with good interpersonal skills such as active listening and asking questions to clarify. We had differing views on ranking items, when this occurred the member would expand on their reasoning and all members actively listened and compromise was made. The group fell short with rational skills and processes, we did not consider alternatives or clearly analyze the

Show More
Related
1329 Words | 6 Pages

Those who are excluded often feel extreme pressure to be accepted back into the group in order to escape their uncomfortable isolation. • Groups also often develop their own distribution of roles, with both leaders and followers. Other group members play either inhibiting roles, rejecting new ideas, or innovating roles, actively developing such ideas. • Another risk of groupthink, according to Janis, can be observed in groups that work together over long periods of time. In addition to reduced efficiency, they also demonstrate reduced “reality testing”, i.e., a distorted sense of reality.

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

Groupthink is a compulsion by members of decision-making groups to maintain agreement, even at the cost of critical thinking. Pearl harbor attack happened on December 7, 1941 is an good example of groupthink. The naval officers thought Japan never dare to attack Hawaii, because Japan and United States seems in a big different level of military force. On the other side, even Japan tried to attack Pearl Harbor, United States still have a lot of time to detect and destroy their attack. So they are ignored the warning from Washington police office.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

The problem solving process requires that information is received, problems are identified, and solutions are generated from which the most plausible solution is arrived at . The inference made by this process is that the elimination of problems through solution development is based on the fact that there are many problems which may be present but one must be identified and solved before another is identified. According to Drs. Paul and Elder, this is referred to as relevance . The determination of whether a problem is relevant under Army problem solving enables the Commanding Officer to focus the thought process towards a particular issue.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

My value for today’s round will be health. Adolescents’ minds aren 't fully developed until the age twenty one. Without the fully developed brain the adolescent can’t make fully developed decisions. My criterion for today’s round will be frame of mind. An adolescent, when making decisions, only looks at the time frame of here and now.

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

Analyzing prior challenges and successful tactics helps individuals develop a critical perspective for tackling current situations. This encourages flexibility and enables them to make wise choices when confronted with unforeseen obstacles or challenges from the students. For example, a physics instructor may notice that during lectures on theoretical physics, students are not as attentive. The

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

Reflective Paragraphs. Our group has 3 members is Many, Ice and me. We have 55 minutes of discussions about how a burglar and his victim became the best of friends. We management times are 3 parts.

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

“You know, they need welders. They need ‘em worse than soldiers.” (Hauser Quotes). This quote said by Hauser means that there are so many open spots for welding and great opportunities for employment.

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

The purpose of group learning and development is to ensure that all learning styles are catered for and the ultimate goal of sharing knowledge is achieved. When using a group to deliver something new each individual can call on a fellow participant to confirm understanding. 1.2 Explain why delivery of learning and development must reflect group dynamics When delivering to a group it is important to consider, what is the normal behaviour within the group? Who plays what role?

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Generating Alternative Solutions-this is the second step in the basic leadership process that is utilized to create elective answers for unravel an issue. Regularly, supervisors utilize elective arrangements from past encounters. 3. Evaluating Alternatives-this is the third step in the basic leadership process; it is intended to decide the estimation of the options that were framed. Likewise, amid this procedure, a choice is made on which arrangement ought to be utilized to unravel the issue.

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

The key lies in the advantages of cooperation. Groups can take advantage of specialization and of economies of scale, which provide advantages is securing food, providing protection, and so on. The basic tension is that the ultimate cause, to pass on our genes, is basically selfish. The only rational reason to form a group beyond our kin is that it provides an advantage to each individual that he or she would not have alone. Once an extra-familial group is formed, the problem is that while the group as a whole would better off if everyone cooperated, there an incentive for the individual to free ride, cheat, and defect in various ways.

Read More
1196 Words | 5 Pages

This process will not only generate new knowledge, but reinforces existing ones. This process of solving problems in the workplace will result in having a cognitive consequence to the learners. An illustration of the types of routine and non-routine problem-solving in BCM is the decision about what is the appropriate procedures to be documented versus what is to be executed during a disaster to be contained in a business continuity plan procedures are problem solving activities. Routine problem

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

Dividing the situation into parts or steps is the analyzing step. Evaluating is the step you need to rate the usefulness, truth, or equalities of the situation. Creating in the critical thinking process is the last event this is the process needed to invent something for the successful outcome based on my ideas. These are all the strategies that are in demand to have a successful outcome to an event using critical thinking. Having a critical approach is very meaningful in my opinion.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Before I joined this class I have less idea about the group dynamic what is means, and what will do. In general, I was think group dynamics is interesting and will improve our self and it is important of future. Know after I finish this subject , the group dynamics was actually interesting subject . It helps me to improve myself to be better because every member want to work together to achieve for our goals. So I know there are many skills that must everyone have it.

Read More
1455 Words | 6 Pages

Most Efficient forms of the learning process: - Acc. to Lewin, learning is best facilitated in an environment where there is dialectic tension and conflict between immediate, concrete experience and analytic detachment. By bringing together the immediate experiences of the trainees and the conceptual models of the staff in an open atmosphere where inputs from each perspective could challenge and stimulate the other, a learning environment occurred with remarkable vitality and creativity. (Kolb.)  Pillars of an efficient learning mechanism in group settings:- o Feedback:-There was a concern that organizations, groups and relationships generally suffered from a lack of accurate information about what was happening around their performance. Feedback became a key ingredient of T-groups and was found to ‘be most effective when it stemmed from here-and-now observations, when it followed the generating event as closely as possible, and when the recipient checked with other group members to establish its validity and reduce perceptual distortion’ (Yalom 1995: 489). o Unfreezing:-This was taken directly from Kurt Lewin’s change theory.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

However, the goal is to produce an outcome; if they cannot continue through the process because of conflict, the team may not get a satisfactory result and progress will stall and the team will fail to perform the task, will not get to evaluate on their experiences or present a finished product (Tuckman 1965). Additionally, it requires participants to use an in-depth method of thought called critical thinking. This process will challenge them to look at different aspects of why the event happened, and they might find that they had a misconceived understanding beforehand and, that, has changed as they explore further and internalise what they have learned.

Read More

More about Group Process And Synergistic Decision Making

Related Topics

Open Document