ipl-logo

Habeas Corpus Rights Vs War On Terror Essay

1027 Words5 Pages

Habeas Corpus Rights vs. the War on Terror
Habeas Corpus is a centuries old legal mechanism enacted by the Magna Carta, signed by King John of England in 1215, and is an important part of the British Common Law tradition, and now, the American legal system. It is one of the foundations of constitutional democracy, and an internationally applied principle, mandating that a government cannot arbitrarily detain its citizens. Ever since the terrorist attacks on 9/11, however, the United States has been fully involved in a war against terrorism, and the application of Habeas Corpus is coming under question.
Recently, many politicians, including the former Bush Administration called for a change in its applicability when relating to terror suspects. This is an unquestionable act of tyranny, and it should cease. Suspects of terrorism must receive Habeas Corpus rights …show more content…

The United States should take heed of the precedent in Northern Ireland. The United Kingdom suspended Habeas Corpus to arrest suspected IRA activists. Rather than suppress the organization, as intended, it increased support for the IRA, and radicalized Catholic youths, who sweepingly joined the IRA. This proves that suspending Habeas Corpus does not work and is unactable for the War on Terror.
In addition, the government should not suspend Habeas Corpus rights for suspected terrorists as it establishes a dangerous precedent for the treatment of captured American or coalition citizens and soldiers. If we disregard the protections of Habeas Corpus, it will set up a dangerous precedent for other nations to follow. Citizens or soldiers of America or its coalition members could receive indefinite detainments and could lack basic legal procedure if captured by foreign forces. This is a concerning matter in the case of journalists, who travel internationally to cover news, and are most at

Show More
Related

Blood Of Tyrants Summary

1036 Words | 5 Pages

We have fierce debates today concerning war tactics, drone strikes on Americans, torture, military tribunals, citizens’ rights during wartime, and how to reconcile the needs of the national defense with liberty and self-rule. Does the president have a constitutional power to torture foreign enemy combatants? Overrule Congress on war tactics? Deny formal trials to enemies?

Read More

How Did Clinton And Horwitz Be Considered A Total War

689 Words | 3 Pages

Habeas corpus is the right of a person who is arrested to have a trial. By suspending habeas corpus, President Lincoln is preventing everyone who is arrested from being released. While the northern army was traveling around, people kept burning bridges and other nuances to slow their advances. Lincoln had to find a way to prevent this from happening so he suspended habeas corpus and had some of the perpetrators arrested. Lincoln said, “... often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb.”

Read More

How Did Abraham Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus?

797 Words | 4 Pages

It states in Article I, Section 9 of the constitution that “the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The NDAA

162 Words | 1 Pages

“For the first time in American history, we have a law authorizing the worldwide and indefinite military detention of people captured far from any battlefield. The NDAA has no temporal or geographic limitations. It is completely at odds with our values, violates the Constitution, and corrodes our Nation’s commitment to the rule of law.” “For the first time in American history, we have a law authorizing the worldwide and indefinite military detention of people captured far from any battlefield. The NDAA has no temporal or geographic limitations.

Read More

How Did Abraham Lincoln Rash Or Unjust

717 Words | 3 Pages

Habeas Corpus is a legal term meaning “the government cannot hold you without cause”. During Abraham Lincoln’s presidency this issue caught fire because on May 25, 1861 John Merryman was arrested for recruiting, training Confederate(southern) soldiers in the north. Abraham Lincoln suspension was a rash and unjust decision because it was used for personal agenda. Also it would allow the soldiers to become judges, executioners, and juries.of the so-called criminals. Another reason is he tried to make an example out of John Merryman.

Read More

Abraham Lincoln's Suspension Of Habeas Corpus

559 Words | 3 Pages

After the Emancipation Proclamation, in 1861 Lincoln decided to issue yet another executive order, suspension of Habeas Corpus. Habeas Corpus is a legal guarantee, which gives the individual the right to know why he or she is being arrested and to be entitled to a trial. It is important to notice that Abraham Lincoln has suspended Habeas Corpus on numerous occasion during the Civil War (Foner, p.98-99). The reason I choose to focus on the executive order form March 3rd, 1983, is because at that time Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus throughout the whole North. We must also acknowledge that Abraham Lincoln was much more careful inn suspending civil liberties during a war, than other American presidents in U.S history.

Read More

How Did Joe Mccarthy Get In Power

506 Words | 3 Pages

In history there have been many powerful leaders and personalities who have used deceit . Some used it to gain power while others used it for other purposes. The people that have lied to gain power mainly lied during elections or started a revolution. For example, Lenin said that Russia would change with him all a lie. In the U.S. there have been some presidents and elected official have lied to get in power and while they were in power.

Read More

Was Lincoln Justified In Cases Of Rebellion

944 Words | 4 Pages

Since the southern states were considered rebels, rebelling against the US, the public safety may require for the privilege of habeas corpus to be suspended. Thus, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus did not infringe on a citizen’s right to habeas corpus, but rather, it was permitted by the

Read More

Bill Of Rights Dbq Essay

839 Words | 4 Pages

Additionally, anti-war newspapers and protesters were detained for the same reasons. The suspension of Habeas Corpus brought nearly thirty-eight thousand unconstitutional arrests to innocent civilians by the end of the Civil War and because of the suspension those who were arrested were denied the right to judicial proceedings or review. In the end, Lincoln found it easier to take away these civil liberties than restore them

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Closing Gitmo

2114 Words | 9 Pages

Over the past fourteen years, approximately 779 men suspected of terrorism have been detained at the Prison for Alleged Terrorists at the United States Naval Base, Guantanamo, Cuba. Now, only eighty men remain. A highly controversial debate surrounding this camp is whether or not closing Gitmo – as the prison came to known – is justifiable and whether or not it should be done. There is one simple answer to this argument. The closing of the Prison for Alleged Terrorists is not justifiable, or reasonable, and therefore should not be done.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Breaking The Sedition Act

791 Words | 4 Pages

This law should never have been established as it curbs free speech that offers an opinion that is against the war. There justification for this law is that not having this puts America in a bad position. In reality this law does the opposite as more people may become against the war if they know that they are being suppressed because of the war. If we prove these men to be guilty does this lead to even further suppression? Even with these laws they should still not be found guilty as these laws should only be used if what they are saying is actively causing violent mobs or calling for people to assassinate American leaders which these two men did not.

Read More

Abraham Lincoln Suspension Of Strangeness

2246 Words | 9 Pages

You are engaged in repressing an insurrection against the laws of the United States. If at any point on or in the vicinity of the military line, which is now being used between the City of Philadelphia and the City of Washington, via Perryville, Annapolis City, and Annapolis Junction, you find resistance which renders it necessary to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus for the public safety, you, personally or through an officer in command at the point where the resistance occurs, are authorized to suspend the

Read More

Should The Government Take Away Constitutional Rights During Times Of War

715 Words | 3 Pages

The government is justified in taking away Constitutional Rights during times of war because they need to keep us safe, so to be able to, the U.S. government needs to take away parts of our rights. The Patriot Act says, “The United States government did this in response to the need for increased security following terrorist attacks.” The purpose is to punish the terrorist acts in the United States and everywhere else, to increase

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility

1354 Words | 6 Pages

Ever since July 4, 1776, the United States has been the land of the free, home of the brave, and anyone who was in the United States had the same constitutional rights young, old, good, and bad. That fact was true until January, 2002 when Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility (GITMO) was opened. GITMO is a detention facility that was approved by congress after the terrorist attacks of 9/11 so that the terrorists can be detained, tried, and punished. GITMO is located on a naval base in Cuba it is located in Cuba so that the terrorists do not touch American soil. This sounds like a great idea of paper, trying terrorists for the horrible attacks that they have committed against innocent people, and being able to detain the convicted in Cuba away

Read More

Habeas Corpus's Execution Essay: The Fight Against Terrorism

890 Words | 4 Pages

After seeing the damage terrorism has caused throughout the world, it is hard to justify providing rights to people who want to deny innocent people of their right to live. Terrorism is an untraditional form of warfare and requires action - Action based on proactivity and security for the safety of American citizens. The government is willing to suspend habeas corpus for the safety of its people, but granting habeas corpus inhibits the execution of these actions. Habeas Corpus should not be given to suspected terrorists, because terrorism should not be treated in a traditional manner, Counter-terrorism requires new methods, and can legally be justified.

Read More

More about Habeas Corpus Rights Vs War On Terror Essay

Related Topics

Open Document