Athletic Director Bob Marcus has quite the challenge in allocating the athletic department funds appropriately throughout all the programs within Oakbend Senior High School. After critically analyzing the case study it was quite clear some sports such as football and girls basketball received much more funding compared to other sports such as cross country and track and field. Throughout this case brief an effective solution that is both fair and in line with the districts mission will be expanded on to assist Bob Marcus is making the necessary budget cuts to provide a successful athletic program in the future. Marcus needs to cut about $80,000 from the previous budget plan to accommodate the funding cuts made by the school.
Parents think that the more money they put into the child’s athletic expenses, they increase their chances of college scholarships and leading to a professional athletic career. An exceedingly amount of money can be spent on athletics because parents want to be able to provide every opportunity they can for their child to become better and to be successful. For example, at Jim-McLean Junior Golf Performance Academy, there are only twenty-four spots open each year for distinct private instruction. With limited entry comes at a cost of $39,875 to $58,875 annually. A noticeable agglomeration of money comes out of the family’s gross income to fund their child’s athletics.
Krikor, Meshefejian argues that athletes are producing revenues not only for the schools, but also for shoe companies, television networks, and the conference that they belong in. There are students athletes who choose to leave school early and go pro because they do not have enough money to support their
In fact, of the schools that didn’t make a profit, $7.8 million was lost on average each year (Lewis and Williams). So, it can be concluded that if there is not enough money to even cover current expenditures, there is no way to pay student-athletes without increasing expenses further or finding a different way to pay for it. Other alternatives to come up with the money could include cuts in athletic scholarships given out to other college athletes who may not necessarily be paid and to increase the amount of fees collected from students (Sanderson and Siegfried 130). Although these may seem like great
When the players perform well, the fan base increases along with the revenue. Universities and colleges will profit off these retail items with their star players’ names across the back as a higher customer base is achieved. The generated revenue circulates back into the school and opens up more opportunities for new players to be recruited and given scholarships to be part of their teams. This extra profit then becomes available to sponsor less popular sports that generates a higher output than input in sales. Alternatively to checks and cash, the school returns that generated revenue to their students by issuing out meal plans, scholarships, supplies, books, and other essentials.
Synthesis Essay: Corporate Sponsorship Corporate businesses sponsor just about everything: professional sports teams and stadiums, theaters, music halls, dance performances, art galleries, museums. Everywhere you look you will see ads for energy drinks, make-up, radio shows, you name it. Though sponsorship is for the most part accepted in everyday life, corporate sponsorship in high school can be controversial. There are both pros and cons to it. It benefits the schools by providing much needed funding especially for art and music programs.
Unequal Funding for High School Sports High school sports are a very important part of our school, promoting not only good physical health, but encouraging athletes to find success in other areas of their life as well. As a school, we should want our sports teams to push to be the best they can be, which leads to the question how will our sports teams improve if they all aren’t funded equally? Unequal funding for our sports teams today is unfair because no sport is more or less important than the other, funding for the sports shouldn’t depend on the popularity of the sport, sports with better equipment are able to perform better, and those without good equipment are set up for failure, and giving less money to some sports tells the athletes
Athletes should be able to receive a portion of the money that comes from merchandise with their image. Finally, they and are not offered medical or death insurance. Allowing these students to be paid can help benefit their future sports and academic career. During a regular sports season, college athletes are focused on practice and school because of this they don’t have the time to be able to get a regular job to make money of their own. These students often go to colleges and universities that offer them scholarships for sports.
The author of this argument claims that the school should not offer free student access to the university athletic events. To support this claim, the author cites that charging admission to all events is the only way to treat all athletic teams equitably. I found this argument logically unconvincing in several respects. As far as we know, the number of applicants to the Division II sports are lower than the Division I ones. The most popular sports include in the Division I sports group.
Instead of going to college through the year, then going and working during summer, the athletes could enjoy the summer and have a little extra money to themselves. They would not have to get an additional job to work at. Despite all of this cash floating around, the players who make the organization work do not see any of this money. In fact, they are barred
Also amount of walk-on athletes that participate in sporting activities. Many student athletes in football and men’s basketball, most of the time, they bring in the revenue for the university compared to other sports. Such as, Ohio State University brought in 170,789,158 dollars and their expenses were
Giving part of the money for the merchandise sold off the college athletes would be giving credit to their hard work and showing everyone 's appreciation towards them. “The NCAA, as a whole, makes 6 billion annually”(Should NCAA Athletes). Out of the 6 billion dollars they make, none of the hard working athletes get any of that money. You
In 2016-2017, 19% of interscholastic athletic departments relied on fundraisers to generate at least half of their athletic department budget (Hoffman, 2018). Without funds, athletic departments would cease to exist in high schools. For example, Mount Vernon High School in New York was forced to raise $950,000 in order to keep their athletic program from folding (Jim, n.d.). Although money is often a taboo topic, it is necessary for athletic departments and non-profits to function. Therefore, generating revenue is a priority for
They get to attend a college, get their degree, and play a sport they love, all because of their skill level in that certain field. Some people believe that that is payment enough for their hard work, publicity, and energy exerted through the sport. Mark Emmert said in an interview with CNBC, “If a school is selling jerseys or memorabilia, then we need to know, are they taking those resources and putting them back into support for student-athletes and athletic programs? In every case that I know, those revenues go to support the student-athlete.” Money being made from memorabilia reportedly is partially going into student athletes and their college expenses.
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
