During the first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, they discuss about to topics of creation of new jobs, racial discrimination with the police cases in Chicago, and tax cuts on the wealthy or to raise them. As well as their individual plans for more jobs to be created for America’s because individuals out there currently do not have a job. On one side there’s Trump where he wants to mainly focuses on enriching the wealthy to help to middle class, while Clinton focuses on building up the middle class, and lowering the power that wealthy Americans have over the middle class. In Fact, currently there are many Americans that cannot decide on whether they’d want to vote for Trump or Clinton or neither, since both candidates haven’t been the most trusting in their past. Furthermore, in America there’s always been a problem with not enough jobs for individuals in our society. Each Candidate approaches this problem differently. Trump’s plan is to reduce taxes on the wealthy in order to re negation with other industries, and for companies to not leave in the first place. From proven in the past Clinton mentioned that they went about that way before …show more content…
While, Trump does not exactly give statistics and real numbers on his plan. In which this has myself take the side with Clinton, because a president has to always be ready for anything throw at them, and trump doesn’t seem to have that quality during this debate. As well as in my own beliefs, I do not believe that by lowering the taxes of the wealthy would help the middle class, except for helping themselves, and is proven in the past. America already has a 20 trillion debt that the current president created for us. America does not need more of a debt or a fail in our economy by using a method in the past that has failed for the middle