ipl-logo

How Did The French Revolution Affect Society

1250 Words5 Pages

To begin, the French revolution was politically significant because they threw away the monarchy, and they took off King Louis XVI. This revolution was viewed as socially because after the revolution ended the offices. And, economically the government changed many new rules, so the society could stay with peace. France grew strong together as a nation. The French Revolution was divided into three estates. The First estate general was the clergy. It had 100,000 members from the catholic church. This estate believed in God, religion, and the afterlife. This estate was also wealthy, and never had to taxes and they had privileges. Next, the second estate was the nobility, it had 400,000 members they had the ability to collect taxes. They were also wealthy, and didn’t have to pay any taxes either. Second estate didn’t want to change anything from France unless it’s about gaining more political power. The last estate is the third one, it was the lowest class. It made up 98% of the people. It didn’t have much representation in the government. They also didn’t have much influence from voting. They worked hard but didn’t get payed much. This group didn’t have much wealth, but …show more content…

In New York, people were protesting the poor and wealthy people and how they lived in different worlds and they are treated differently by other people, and the way the corporations use their money. The workers who are the working class and the middle class lost their jobs, and houses because the bankers and the brokers were lacking, and they were paying more from their income taxes. The occupy movement was the new third estate because both group claimed they were representing majority of the people the third estate was part of the 97% and the occupy movement was part of the 99%. They both feel liked the government failed on how to operate correctly. Both movement brought attention to the problem that was

Show More
Related
780 Words | 4 Pages

In France, the 1st and 2nd estates would conspire together to maintain dominance, leaving the 3rd estate with only one vote and no power.

Read More
256 Words | 2 Pages

They were poor yet heavily taxed by government. (Document #1) In the chart, it shows how the 1st and 2nd estates weren’t taxed but 3rd estate was. (Document #2) These two documents show that 3rd estate was not treated fairly, even though 1st and 2nd estates were.

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

The third estate was determined to stop  the unfair taxing  of the lower class.   They saw this as unfair because the third  estate was known as the poorest of the estates.   

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

The second estate was made up of rich nobles. The nobles owned 20 percent of the land in France and paid almost no taxes. The third estate was about 90 percent of the people in France. The third estate laked privileges they had to pay high taxes. They felt that their wealth entitled them to a great degree of social states.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Prior to the French Revolution, French society was divided into three distinct estates: the First Estate, the Second Estate, and the Third Estate. Each estate was represented by individuals of a certain repute who had different roles in 17th century French society. In his written play, Cyrano de Bergerac, Edmond Rostand portrays this class division through his many characters and their place in society. In the 17th century, Roman Catholicism was at its prime in French society.

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

In Emmanuel Sieyès’ the What is the Third Estate he states, “Only the lucrative and honorary positions are held by members of the privileged order…”(156). Both Spencer and Sieyès have similar thoughts in that the upper class are the ones that hold most, if not all, the power and wealth. Sieyès repeatedly mentions the word “privileged” which is referring to the upper class and those who do not have to work as much to get what they want. He also states the questions, “what is the third estate?” multiple times and one of his responses he says that third estate is everything, everything that is in a constant struggle and that is oppressed (156).

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

They owned 25% of the land and only paid 2% of taxes. Now comes the shocking part: the rich people paid nothing. The First Estate owned 10% of land and paid 0% of the taxes. According to Document 3, the Third Estate demanded that three changes should be made in the French Government: every tax should be granted by the Estates General for a limited time, they needed to schedule the meetings of the Estates General for definite times and the votes of the Third Estate should be taken by head in the assembly. Document 4 states that, when the middle class found out about Enlightenment ideas, they became the leaders of the Revolution.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

As the French had about Twenty-five million people, 100,000 were clergy, 400,000 were the nobleman, and the rest was known as the third estate. The third estate was left to starve, while Louis XVi and Marie Antoinette lived a luxury lifestyle. The only food they could afford for a limited time was bread, but then the prices got so high, that the rich can only afford it.

Read More
2015 Words | 9 Pages

He was very controlling and lived a luxurious lifestyle. France, at the time, had Three Estates and the Third contained 90 percent of the entire population. This population was not rich, yet they still paid 100 percent of the taxes.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

To him, the Third Estate of France is everything. When saying this, he is comparing the Third Estate, which is comprised of the common people, to the privileged people of France. For instance, the common people did not have the proper representation. Usually, whoever represented them was, unfortunately, not appointed by them, so did not have their best interests in mind. Additionally, the Third Estate was always outvoted in the Estate General because their individual votes, which would have outnumbered the votes of the other two estates, were not counted, rather, each estate could claim one vote each.

Read More
1761 Words | 8 Pages

Marie and Louis both thought that the clergy was vital in maintaining order so the clergy received support from the government (Durant 82). The clergy also received exemptions from taxes that the Third Estate was forced to pay and while they were not paying those taxes they were collecting tithes and income from the population (Durant 82). Furthermore, the clergy also collected feudal dues from the Third Estate for all the land that the Church owned which made up about a fifth of the soil in France (Durant 82). All of this inequality between the Third Estate and the clergy fostered an extreme discontent with the social hierarchy that existed in France in

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The activists were all different ages, genders, and races that joined together wanting the same thing,

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

During the Eighteenth Century, France had an absolute monarchy with Louis XVI as king and Marie Antoinette as queen. In that time period, French society was based upon a system of Estates where the clergy made up the First Estate; the nobility comprised the Second Estate, and everyone else including professionals, peasants, and the bourgeoisie made up the Third Estate. The Third Estate was immensely unhappy with the old regime, the Estates General, and Louis XVI’s leadership. France was also in the midst of a fiscal crisis due to the American Revolution, Louis XVI’s lavish lifestyle, the Seven Years War, and the tax exemption of the First and Second Estate. Following the surge of new ideas and impactful philosophers from the Enlightenment,

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The French revolution is considered to be the most significant and effective event in the history. It changed the lives of many peoples and changed the future. Since people of France were under the control of the King they wanted to get rid of French government to eliminate power of the king. There were numerous other factors that also lead the French to the revolution. There were also many social unfairness among the taxes between the estates.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

In my own opinion, people should be taught to write in cursive, therefore it should be kept in schools. Cursive may not be very essential in our modern lives, yet it is still an important skill to learn. As stated in paragraph three, studies shows that writing in cursive stimulates both sides of the brain as well as helping in the development of fine motor-skills, which does help us in our average lives whether you notice it or not. Being able to write in cursive allows a person to anticipate further and think quickly, which in turn allows for quicker reaction time, and more brain activity. Of course, as stated in paragraph two of the second article, we all do things digitally.

Read More

More about How Did The French Revolution Affect Society

Related Topics

Open Document