How Is Chris Mccandless Justified In Into The Wild

639 Words3 Pages

Chris McCandless is a complex and controversial figure whose life and death have captured the imagination of many. His journey, as chronicled in Jon Krakauer’s book “Into the Wild,”has been a subject of controversy and debate. While some veiw him as a hero, an adventurous spirit who pursued his dreams and sought to live life on his own terms, while others view him as a naive and misguided young man who continuously put his life at risk. However, regardless of one’s personal opinion, there is no need to justify McCandless’s actions. Instead of people assuming things, they should try to understand the reasons that he went into the wild. McCandless just wanted to live life independently without the government, relationships, or things that would stop him from being self-reliant. …show more content…

Chris McCandless was a free-thinking individual who made a conscious decision to leave behind his life and pursue a life of adventure and self-discovery. In the book “Into the Wild” Krakauer states “I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. I wanted excitement and danger and the chance to sacrifice myself for my love. I felt in myself a superabundance of energy which found no outlet in our quiet life.” (Krakauer 15). Chris was fully aware of the risks and challenges involved, and accepted them willingly. Instead of just following everyone else around, Chris got up and did what many wanted to do because that was the life he wanted. There is no need for people to judge or justify because this was his choice that he completely thought