ipl-logo

How Is Marc Antony Similar To Brutus Caesar

410 Words2 Pages

Antony vs Brutus Today we will be comparing and contrasting both Brutus’ and Marc Antony's speeches. Both comparing and contrasting the believability/credibility, logical facts, and emotional appeal of each speech. There will be lines directly from the book relating to the speeches of both men. These will help show the facts of the use of logos, ethos, and pathos. The speeches can almost exactly correlate with outcome of the story. After Caesar's death Marc Antony and Brutus both came before the city of Rome and gave both similar but very different speeches. In Brutus’ speech logos played a bigger roll than anything else. Brutus tried to use his power with his name to win over the people of Rome. Brutus states in his speech “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect for mine honor, that you may believe” (III, ii, 14-16). In this Brutus is using ethos by telling the spectators to believe him and his honor because of his name. …show more content…

Here Brutus is trying to use pathos to get the emotional appeal to the people. In Marc Antony's he tries to counter Brutus’ speech by saying “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, find I must pause till it come back to me” (III, ii, 108-109). Antony also states, “But here is a parchment with the seal of Caesar; I found it in his closet, tis’ his will. Let but the commons near this testament; which pardon me I do not intend to read”(III, ii,

Show More
Related

Antony And Brutus Use Of Rhetorical Devices Used In Julius Caesar

957 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar, both Antony and Brutus delivered languishing speeches using rhetorical devices to attract the audience and persuade the crowd that their opinions were correct and logical. Marcus Brutus used more of a scare tactic and threatened the people of Rome to challenge him. Mark Antony used more of a sentimental and emotional technique to appeal to the vulnerable audience. He speaks to the crowd, rather than above it as Brutus does in his lofty speech of honor. Mark Antony presented the more rhetorically effective speech using the vulnerability of the Roman citizen’s feelings and the techniques of pathos, plain folk, bandwagon and reverse psychology.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar's Death

1009 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus and Antony both spoke to the Plebeians at Caesar’s funeral with the intent to persuade the crowd to be in favor of themselves. Since Brutus utilized Ethos and Logos to explain his actions and nothing more, his speech was logical. Correspondingly, he had spoken with the hope that the situation would resolve with the Plebeian’s understanding and his entry into Kingman ship. Meanwhile, Antony made use of Pathos with Logos. Therefore, Antony’s monologue was based emotionally.

Read More

Ethos And Figurative Language In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

1173 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus used ethos frequently throughout his speech, as the people of Rome believe he is honorable and trustworthy. As a result, Antony must diminish Brutus’s honor in the eyes of the crowd in order to make them turn on Brutus. Throughout the speech, Antony says, “Brutus is an honorable man,” each time after giving evidence that Caesar was a good, caring leader. However, the line became increasingly sarcastic each time he said it. As Antony continued to list Caesar’s good deeds, the crowd began to question whether Brutus truly was honorable or whether he had lied about Caesar to free himself of guilt.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos Logos In Julius Caesar

1057 Words | 5 Pages

The honorable Brutus, leader of the conspirators, believed no good could come from Caesar’s ambition. When presenting his argument to the people, Brutus included Ethos, a mode of persuasion technique that shows the audience he is a credible, unbiased, source worth listening to. In Act 3 Lines 16-17, Brutus addresses the crowd with the statement that follows, “ If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus' love to Caesar was no less than his.”. This statement was included in Brutus's speech to ensure the crowd that there was

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

437 Words | 2 Pages

Antony uses pathos he communicates to the people in a way that Brutus did not. Since, Antony is not allowed to say anything bad at the funeral he discretely criticizes Brutus and Cassius because he feels that what they did was wrong. For example, when Antony makes a comment that is contrary to what he means, he says “But Brutus is an honourable man”. Antony uses a lot of pathos because he wants the citizens to feel the way he is feeling. For example, he says he wants to read them the letter but he does not want to make them weep because of how much Caesar loved them.

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos Analysis

398 Words | 2 Pages

Brutus uses pathos by triggering the emotional feelings of people when he says how much he loved Caesar. He says, “any dear friend of Caesar’s... that Brutus’ love to Caesar

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More

Brutus's Ethos Pathos And Logos

339 Words | 2 Pages

In Brutus’s speech he uses all three of ethos, pathos; and logos. In the beginning of his speech he uses ethos by explaining how the people of Rome know his past and how he is an honorable man. Using the statement, “Had you rather Caesar were living and all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” , there he is

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos

916 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus chooses to use Pathos in a way that forces the people to think about the love of freedom and their country. He uses the mention of slavery and being controlled to get to the emotions of the listeners.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis

754 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus and Antony use ethos, logos, and pathos in their speeches to convince the commoners of their side of the story. One person just so happens to be more convincing than the other. Using ethos,

Read More

Character Analysis: The Grapes Of Wrath

542 Words | 3 Pages

Stealing money and giving it to the needy isn’t anything new. Ashleigh knew her dad needed that money so she stole it from her mother. Although this may not be the right thing to do, Ashleigh still stole the money for her dad because she prefers her dad over her mom, and her dad made her feel special. A major reason Ashleigh took the money was because she prefers her dad over her mom.

Read More

Rhetorical Appeals In Brutus

755 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus uses Pathos most out of all of the three Rhetorical appeals. He tries to use the crowds and the reader’s emotions to win their heart. As Brutus talks to the crowded they are very angry,so Brutus starts off by trying to cool them down. ”Be patient till the

Read More

Analyzing The Words 'Mourn For Caesar'

441 Words | 2 Pages

Ethos, Pathos, and logos are the rhetorical triangle of a speaker's ability to appeal to their audience. Both men used the credibility of their names, logic, and showed emotion during their speeches to the citizens of Rome. The one fatal flaw that makes their speech so different is their use of actions to the audience. Brutus’ speech is not just about Caesar, it is also his way of convincing the crowd that his murder was not out of malice or blood lust. His starting words weren't about Caesar, they were about how the crowd should judge his actions fairly based on how they knew

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech

824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about How Is Marc Antony Similar To Brutus Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document