How Is Rome Different From The Roman Empire

769 Words4 Pages

Though alike in initial ideologies, the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire grew to be very different compared to the other. The most notable reason Rome transformed from a republic to an empire was the amount of territory it began to conquer and the local peoples couldn’t vote for laws and regulations everytime an official proposed a change. People usually acknowledge the empire more knowingly because of the power it acquired across Southern Europe, the Mediterranean, the Middle East, and Northern Africa, whereas the Roman Republic initially began as a smaller civilization, consisting of local regulations and smaller gaps in social classes. The Roman Republic is typically considered to have more of a fair governmental system and treatment …show more content…

As the empire grew, the gap between the rich and poor widened remarkably and more soldiers were recruited in desperate need of more protection from opposing forces. The sharp increase in gaps of social classes resulted in high rates of unemployment amongst the poor, soon after, Julius Caesar granted broader paths to legal citizenship and more jobs for the unemployed poor. After Julius Caesar is murdered by the Senate, Augustus takes control during the Second Triumvirate and leads Rome in its official transformation from a republic to an empire. Many later emperors become corrupt in their power and deprive citizens of their basic rights later in the Pax Romana (a period of approximately 200 years consisting of peace and relative satisfaction throughout the empire). Slavery becomes a larger part of Roman culture as agriculture rises as the main source of income and trade becomes more necessary. As the empire approaches its fall, the economy weakens and Rome reaches its limit of expansion, beginning to lack its regular sources of silver and gold. Taxes were raised, soil lost fertility, and the armies became less devoted because of the corruption of governmental power and