In the period of prosperity, the Song dynasty and the Tang dynasty are similar with their ways in which they fought to be safe from other armies and smart when working to improve their dynasty. In the dynastic cycle, the Song and Tang dynasty showed similar periods of prosperity. In the beginning, the Song dynasty was very successful. Due to the period of rebellion that tore apart the Tang dynasty, The Songs decided they would have a test so they could only have the strongest army to prevent any period of rebellion.
As we can see in the chapters before the family dynamics was completely different in a sense of being together all the time, doing chores and farming together. As the country started to develop more and more, families only saw each other after working a job from 9-5pm. As Divine states, “in factories and working offices family members rarely worked together”(Divine, page 449). The families were divided in a working class family as the city life progressed. For working class families this had to take a toll on children because in a natural setting children would be at school for most of the time while their parents worked.
On top of the peasants or other lower classes there were
The peasants, included of farmers and fishermen, was the largest social group of whom were all legally bound to by the person who owned their land. Chonin, last on the
The peasants often gave chicken, eggs, etc. in payment to their lords. In addition to the serfs, there were also artisans and people who worked in the chapel (Document 2). All of the people within the manor were extremely important for the survival of all the social classes, and everyone depended on the hard work produced by the people who worked the land. Also, as trade and commerce began to grow, the lives of the people in the Middle Ages also changed.
Dynastic China, which lasted from 1000 B.C. to 500 A.D., lay between the Yangtze and Huanghe rivers in Asia. The longevity of dynastic China and Egypt can be explained by their geography, society and political structure. One thing to consider about ancient China and Egypt is their geography. Both civilizations developed
Manorialism emphasized the manor’s role as a basic economic power. Peasants now worked as free
New Forms of Social Organization and Modes of Production ------------------ How did agriculture’s role change between 1450-1750? What pre-requisite conditions made these changes possible? 4.2.I How did labor systems develop between 1450-1750? 4.2.I.A How was peasant labor affected between 1450-1750?
In the Dynastic cycle, the Ming Dynasty and Song Dynasty of ancient China showed similar periods of Prosperity. These two dynasty were great thinkers. They both improved a lot of things like ships, made maps, books, glow in the dark paint, astronomers, mathematics, and so much more! The Song appointed government positions to the most qualified out of the thousands that applied.
We have every aspects of life’s requirements to our advantage such as education, homes, and prosperity. Therefore, we don’t follow the same rules that were going on during the Middle Age. In conclusion, I can say that the serfs who lived during the Middle Ages were treated unfairly and
In return, the serfs guarded the lord’s lands, took care of his animals, and complete other tasks to maintain the property. Also, peasant women worked in the farm with their husbands. The peasants, whether they were free or a serf, owed the lord precise duties. These included days of labor each week and a certain number of their grain and crops. Peasants and serfs rarely traveled more than 25 miles from their
Ancient China was under a dynastic govern where rulers from a similar family ruled for eras. China was united into an empire and there was an emperor who ruled over many weaker kings. Dynasties from different regions often competed for supremacy to control China's resources and territories. Most dominant king became the emperor, who ruthlessly applied the law and formed massive work strength. Under the kings were a group of lords, and these lords ruled individual farmers.
The Correlation Between Macbeth and Modern Entertainment The Tragedy of Macbeth was written with many themes along the same lines as themes we would see in movies, literature, and music found in our society today. For its time, it was accelerated way beyond any literature we would see written then with these new themes. Macbeth contained violence, inhumane murder, a woman driven role, ambition, and a looming sense of evil. Between the constant violence and the introduction of the lead female role, most works of film today are centered around what Macbeth brought to the table long ago. The main character of Macbeth was a man who was driven to prevail, he would not let anything or anyone get in his way until he accomplished his task.
Individuals during this time often married young, and the majority were either in the lower classes consisting of small landholders or landless poor. Land was often divided up evenly to successors. In stark contrast to the pre-famine social structure found in Ireland, post-famine immigrants were usually those who wished to seek out a more premising life on their own. People married late or not at all, the majority of people fell into the social class of middling or strong farmers, and land was not divided evenly amongst successors, but rather there was a single heir chosen that was always the eldest son, (also known as the Primogeniture). Passing on land was not always a physical passing of property as many did not own their own land but were rather tenant farmers.
For them, life was difficult. They had to work long, hard hours on the manor that belonged to their lord. Most peasants were farmers. Peasants did not have good food or clothing. They did not have the right to be educated.
