ipl-logo

Disadvantages Between The Rich And The Poor During The Civil War

983 Words4 Pages

In chapter 10 Howard Zinn talks about the civil war, the disadvantages and advantages between the poor and rich. The poor have always been the bait in America, due to the lack of money and power. When war is in progress, most of the time the poor are demanded to go to war because the wealthy groups have the money and power to escape from death. “ To give people a choice between two different parties and allow them, in a period of rebellion, to choose the slightly more democratic one was an ingenious mode of control. Like so much in the American system, it was not devilishly contrived by some master plotters; it developed naturally out of the needs of the situation”( Zinn, 200). Most wars in America are not well planned which is a bigger problem because more men will die. To start, a war, men are needed to fight and the poor have no other option. The rich can pay their way out by the power and money that has always been in their favor. It is a significant problem …show more content…

Immigrants and poor works worked together to increase the wages. The rich wanted to ensure in maintaining their power and wealth, leaving the others in terrible circumstances. “The purpose of the state was to settle upper-class disputes peacefully,control lower-class rebellion, and adopt policies that would further the long-range stability of the system”(Zinn, 238). Always, the wealthy and powerful have control the lower class, creating discriminatory laws. These laws that have been created is beneficial to the rich. The ones responsible creating these policies are the ones who want the lower class to suffer to gain money. Peace is granted to the upper class because of the power they have ignoring the poor. The state needs wealthy allies to become powerful and richer which the laws that are created limit the poor having no access to

Show More
Related
76 Words | 1 Pages

During the Civil War there were many differences besides slavery. This war had the most American deaths than all of the wars the U.S. has been in combined! The south seceded from the north for slavery and other less important reasons. The North had more of nearly everything like navy, soldiers,horses, and food, while the south had slaves, cotton, and donkeys/mules. Throughout the war many great leaders rose and fell, battles fought, and great and terrible outcomes.

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

Next, when the North had more upper class people due to wealth, it caused the North and South to disagree with how money should be obtained. The South argued that slavery was the answer and the North argued that factories were what had to be done. In one of the documents, it said, “There were 22 million people in the North compared with only 9 million in the South” (Document 7). This means there was more money being made in the North due to more people working in factories versus money being made selling cotton produced by slaves on plantations. The disputes on money were a huge factor in causing the Civil War.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

The North had many advantages one of these was Abraham Lincoln, the north also had a larger population, and a large advantage at 5-to-two in military power. Not only were they large in population the Union was also very wealthy and controlled shipping. The North also had industrial power, more railroads, and more land. As you can see the United States had many more advantages than the Rebels, but they also have quite a few disadvantages. One disadvantage was that the Northern armies had little motivation because they weren't fighting for a cause.

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Although slavery is the most popular cause of the Civil War there are multiple issues that truly caused the Civil War. For the first time in American history there was a collapse two party system which had the country divided before the war truly broke out; which causes the turmoil after the election of 1860. The political problems that left the country divided had a direct link to the North and South’s different economic

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The first main cause of the Civil War was economic differences between the Northern and Southern states. During the first few decades of the 19th century, the North had an industrial revolution that brought an economy that relied on laborers. While at the same time, the South continued to rely on slaves for their farming and the production of cotton. The Northerners did not need slaves for their economy, but the Southerners could not make any profit without cotton or slaves. In the 1860’s, the North had twice as many railroads as the South, and the South had a bigger cotton production because of their slave population (Document A).

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The argument in this chapter is focused around how income inequality has caused voters to demand policies that redistribute income and wealth downward from the wealthy. This has been caused by a few different things according to the authors. Data shows that voters and nonvoters have a significant difference in income. This is because the bottom of income distribution consists of poor immigrants who aren’t citizens and have no voting rights. There was an explosion in immigration from poorer countries.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

During this time period there was many writers writing both for and against the South. A major person in history, Thomas Jefferson, would write against the North and for the South. That is only one of many example from back then, but at this time some of the greatest critics of the South were from the South. Some people believe the South has such a long memory on the civil war because they lost, and even though some people in the current South want many of their peers to just forget about that time in history, many will not give it up.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

According to Paul Collier’s book, The Bottom Billion, 73 percent of the ‘bottom billion’ have been involved in a civil war or are still in one. By starting a civil war, it creates a vicious cycle, where the civil war causes poverty, and there is a lower income as a result of the civil war. By having less improvement, and less income for the people, there are more angry people in the country which causes more tension, causing more of a civil war between the people. An example of this is the Union army of america, in 1864. During the civil war, wealth between the people was dropping and the price of things were increasing, and large amounts of cropland were worn out and the products like cotton and tobacco fell which made many people get a lower

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

Tensions rose across the country from those in support support of slavery and those opposed. Many states wanted to outlaw slavery while others adamantly defended it because it was the main institution with a high and consistent revenue. Ultimately, the disagreements over slavery are what lead to the Civil War. The country divided into an “Us versus Them” situation which lead to both sides having growing support for their views and making the groups less susceptible to an agreement. In 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation which freed slaves from confederate states.

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

The Southern and Northern states differentiate on many issues, which ultimately led them towards a Civil War. There stood deep social, economic, and political disparities between the North and the South. These modifications stemmed from the understanding of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, most of these disputes about the rights of states directed to the Civil War. There existed reasons other than slavery on behalf of the South 's breakaway.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

The controversy is about overcoming inequality verves the rise of inequality, also the inequality of education resulting in noble prizes and immigrant entrepreneurs. In America, there can be different views of inequality. In the article, “The upside of income inequality” – Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy. They

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

The Civil War not only abolished slavery, but also threw the significant challenge of rebuilding a war-torn nation. Although initiated with the best hopes and intentions, the ‘Reconstruction’ of the USA had collapsed miserably for it had failed to establish a nation with equal rights for all. As a consequence, class discrimination and racial injustice had engulfed the American society. Besides having similarities and differences, the struggles for racial justice in the late 19th century and the struggles for economic justice in the Gilded Age are not only reminders of the failed ideology of the reconstruction, but are also evidence which shows us that the upper class of the society in that era were reluctant about the upward mobility of the poor.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

After the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the rise of the Republican party, Southerners feared the tipping of the balance of political power against them; their need for self-determination parallel the colonists’ belief of rebelling against the oppressive government of Great Britain. However, the Civil War represented something more: the clash of the feudalistic, agrarian South with the industrialized, capitalistic North. These two powers differed socially, politically, and economically, and were especially conflicted over slavery. These two sections of the United States were divided against one another, and could not survive this way. Therefore, it is more accurate to state that though the Civil War resembled some aspects of the American Revolution, it was a clash between two forces who could not exist with one another in their current state, leading inevitably to conflict between the

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

While people were facing inequality, judges took the side of employers in the labor market and police force did not drives to repress dissent violently when people protest peacefully. Today America is a nation whose economy worked for almost everyone, not only the rich. if you worked hard, you had a decent possibility having what you

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, the government favours the rich from the expense of the individuals who are less wealthier. For example, some economic effects of this would be a decline of labour unions, the outsourcing of jobs, an increase of high skilled workers compared to low-skilled workers, and ultimately, the rich will become more wealthier while the poor will stay poor or even fall into a state of poverty. Conclusively, I believe that in order, to resolve this issue, programs that will ensure to help the poor advance would be welfare, education, local support groups and, the government itself has to realize that their is an income inequality and that it needs to be addressed. However, even though if the government does recognize that this is an issue, they are unable to come up with a resolution because the political parties are unable to agree to a decision. However, because the government helps out the rich at the expense of the poor, there is greed and corruption involved because the individuals who are in power due to their wealth, they often influence and control government

Read More

More about Disadvantages Between The Rich And The Poor During The Civil War

Related Topics

Open Document