ipl-logo

Human Experimentation Persuasive Speech

460 Words2 Pages

Hello, my name is Brian Esquer, run-on my position in this debate is an affirmative. The reason why I am an affirmative is because I am for human experimentation.

I am for affirmative because without human experimentation we wouldn't be able to cure or help the causes we have today. Including fevers, soar throats, colds, diseases, and etc. Without human experimentation we wouldn't have medicine to help us.

Another reason why I am for human experimentation is because what if we have the cure to let's say cancer but we can't do human experimentation. Just imagine we have the cure to cancer in our hands but we can't use it for dumb reasons. Think about it without all of the human experimentation we have already done helped us out when we had pain or when we were hurt. What if we didn't have that medicine a lot of us would have multiple struggles. Think about the elderly what if they didn't have that medication that they half to use everyday, not to be mean or anything but most of our grandmas and grandpas probably wouldn't be alive right now.

My counterclaim and rebuttal would is tell me how many of you had ever had a sore throat or had a fever? What did your parents do about it? Gave you …show more content…

well your wrong without human experimentation I bet half of us wouldn't be here right now. Without human experimentation to me is like a world without food because some people need these type of medication that there doctors give to them in order to no have pain or to not die and struggle all the their life. I have a bad eye and to cure it they needed to do surgery on my face to help to not have pain through out my life and to be able to get through things without struggling to do the things I love to do without that which would be human experimentation my eye would probably be hurting right now and they prevented that from happening. Human experimentation is something we need and with out it we would have a a lot of struggles in our

Show More
Related
1835 Words | 8 Pages

There are over 100 million animals harmed in US research labs every year. Ninety- two percent of the tests conducted on animals do not actually work when used on people (animal testing). Why use animals at all when researchers can just use humans...incarsaterated humans. In the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” researchers used HeLa cells on men in prison to test the effects of the cells in the human body. Chester Southam put an ad in the Ohio State Penitentiary newsletter for twenty-five volunteers for HeLa cells research.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The Friendship of George George is a hard working man who relies on mental acuity to get the job. He has a natural leader feel to him because he commands all of the people around him. George is described as small man with dark undertones and strong and slender physical features. Despite his dark facial features, George is a man with a caring attitude and helps whoever needs him. George’s best friend is Lennie depends on him to know what to do and tell him what to do.

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Denis Diderot once said, “There are three principal means of acquiring knowledge... observation of nature, reflection, and experimentation. Observation collects facts; reflection combines them; experimentation verifies the result of that combination.” What Denis Diderot talks about is logical when trying to obtain information on a certain subject, and this applies to experiments performed on humans. When individuals think of human experimentation, unethical and immoral are sometimes the first words the pop into their brain. Human experimentation is beneficial in the sense that it can it can provide factual information, advancements in the medical field, and how human experimentation will be beneficial in the future.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

There are too many contraventions to the code of ethics that are set up for present day experimentation. As mentioned earlier, upon reading this story, I was completely disgusted. I was specifically outraged at the man who conducted this experiment; How could he do this to those innocent people? How could he let this happen? So, I did some additional research, because this story had literally upset me to the point of tears.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

Human Experimentation in the 1900’s "The scientists of the world must remember that the research is being done for the sake of mankind and not for the sake of science; scientists must never detach themselves from the humans they serve (Wittenstein 29),” Eva Mozes Kor, who was a Nazi concentration camp survivor. In the early 1900’s , many new vaccines were being produced and doctors were becoming more and more confident. The new laws put into action had put fear into the doctors that the restrictions would stop the advancement of medicine. They ignored the laws and continued with the experimentation (Wittenstein 19.)

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

1. To what extent do you feel that genetic experimentation should be allowed, especially experiments that involve the creation of human life in the laboratory and the cloning of human beings? I’m not sure if I agree with cloning at all. I believe that when it is a person time to die then it is their time and no one should get favors. Cloning can create genetical defects and nowhere does it specify that the diseases you already have wont transfer over to your clone.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

Given that there are several alternatives at present, there is no logical reason for humans to violate animal rights in laboratory experiments. The use of traditional animal testing today shows an irrational, unjust, cruel act of human selfishness. Although I acknowledge most of Regan’s claims, I do not agree with his statement “…if that means that there are some things we cannot learn, then so be it. There are also some things we cannot learn by using humans, if we respect their rights”.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

Commercial Test on Animals should be banned Have you ever wonder how are all products made? Have you taken the time to see what variety of shampoo, makeup, body wash, or other products are you using? Now a day many commercial products before being sold in a store, they should pass through some tests and some products should be tested on animals before being sold. If a product hasn't been tested, it's an experimental product, what if that product starts to develop an allergy or a serious condition that can affect drastically our body.

Read More
60 Words | 1 Pages

Good Morning, After the conference I have had today with Mrs. Dye and yourself, I feel that stopping the small group testing on all Test would be the most beneficial to CarMendi. Moving forward we can reevaluate if she needs small group for the STAAR, or extended time test, or test she has failed on a case by case bases.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

I think that scientist and psychologist shouldn’t be able to do unnecessary experiments on animals. The first reason that I think they shouldn’t is because most of the time these animals don’t survive these procedures. It isn’t right to instantly end an animal’s life, as well as its wrong to end a human’s life. On top of these innocent killings us human’s show little to no remorse. Most people believe that animals don’t suffer or feel pain but according to Victoria Braithwaite even fish feel pain.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Whether this is morally right or wrong, I will present both sides of the argument as well as my opinion. PROS OF ANIMAL TESTING Nearly every nobel Laureate in physiology or medicine since 1901 has relied on animal research. Animal testing has decreased heavily over the years, with not very necessary things like makeup. Without animal testing we wouldn't have the many of the surgerys that we can today such as hip replacement surgery, kidney transplants, heart transplants, or blood transfusions.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

In my evidence one of the primary ethical justifications for conducting research with human subjects. Human experimentation can be needed to help everyone survive. Without human subjects or human experimentation the world wouldn't have things we need like medicine, cures for diseases, and more. While human experimentation can be bad or non-effective in helping people sometimes; but other times it can work

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

I am going to discuss the views of these issues concerning the ethics that goes along with experimenting with animals in this passage. Firstly, animals may be subject to experimentation or be modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human diseases or for testing human potential treatments. For example, it was discovered long ago that rats have similar genetic build-up and the identical systems as human being, so rats have been used along for experimentation. According to the animal research: the ethics of animal experimentation that was published in July the sixtieth 2010,some people argue that experimentation with animals should end because it is wrong to treat animals merely as tools for further knowledge while others ague that animal are better target as opposed to using human beings.

Read More

More about Human Experimentation Persuasive Speech

Related Topics

Open Document