The modern political world has come to the point where people classify arguments or opinions as either good or bad. This classification has caused deep divides and has influenced politics through having, for example, two major political parties. People have created the mindset that there is an either or, but no in between because it just makes it easier when determining if an opinion or argument is good or bad, such as in the case with Islam. These arguments that present the modern political world as divided between “the West” as opposed to “Islam” are political strategies. They cause a further divide in order to support each side’s respective political agendas, but are a result of ignorance on each side because they fail to recognize the arguments …show more content…
His book “Orientalism,” is about the Occident and the Oriental. Said says Orientalism is not the West imperializing the Oriental world, but rather: a distribution of geopolitical awareness into aesthetic, scholarly, economic, sociological, historical, and philological texts; it is an elaboration not only of a basic geographical distinction but also of a whole series of interests which, by such means as analysis, landscape and sociological description, it not only creates but also maintains; it is, rather than expresses, a certain will or intention to understand, in some cases to control, manipulate, even to incorporate, what is a manifestly different …show more content…
Bush is a culprit of making the divide even deeper between Islam and the West by telling the public there is only one right side, out of two sides. One side is the West, the victim, and the other is the attacker. Although Bush hopes that his comment pushes people to sympathize with the side of the West, terrorists groups use this to their advantage. In an ISIS propaganda magazine in response to Bush’s comment it agrees with Bush that there are two sides, however phrases it to their advantage. It says, “either you are with the crusade or you are with Islam.” By phrasing it differently terrorists groups make those who fit into the grayzone, the in between, conflicted because if they pick the West’s side they seem to be making the right moral choice, but if picking Islam they are also following their