More handpicked essays just for you.
Indian removal act explanitory essay
Indian removal act explanitory essay
Negative effects of indian removal act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1814, a military leader Andrew Jackson led several battles that forced the Creek Indians to sign the Treaty of Fort Jackson and give up 23 million acres of their land. Since then, the Cherokee and other Native American tribes have adapted themselves and their culture to become ‘civilized’. Andrew Jackson later became elected as president and in his first Annual Address to Congress, he introduced his support for Indian Removal. The Indian Removal Act was signed by President Jackson on May 28, 1830.
Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).
READING QUESTIONS Day 128: Native Americans and the New Republic: Q. Why did the Americans want the natives to peacefully conform to their new American ways? A. Q. What did the Indians want to do when the Americans asked them to peacefully conform to their civilized ways? A. The Indians wanted to keep their Indian culture and traditions, while still civilizing themselves.
Then State governments started joining in this effort to try to drive the Native Americans out. Several states had passed laws limiting the Native Americans sovereignty and rights and encroaching on their own territory. Andrew Jackson, president during this time, has been a supporter of what he called “Indian removal.”
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a time where there were lots of contradictions. Meanwhile It was a period of land hungry Americans who wanted to expand land democratic institutions which unfolded the limitations of democracy. The states put an end to property restrictions and due to the Louisiana purchase of1812 the American's saw more opportunities to start expanding and settling in towards the west, but was all destroyed for the native Americans who lived that way. No one knew the way the democracy worked at this age better than the Cherokees, who embraced their lifestyle and culture only to be mistreated and misunderstood when sent to be moved forcibly against their will from their home land and move to the east. In this document I will
Native Americans who emigrated from Europe perceived the Indians as a friendly society with whom they dwelt with in harmony. While Native Americans were largely intensive agriculturalists and entrepreneurial in nature, the Indians were hunters and gatherers who earned a livelihood predominantly as nomads. By the 19th century, irrefutable territories i.e. the areas around River Mississippi were under exclusive occupation by the Indians. At the time, different Indian tribes such as the Chickasaws, Creeks, and Cherokees had adapted a sedentary lifestyle and practiced small-scale agriculture. According to the proponents of removal, the Indians were to move westwards into forested lands in order to generate additional space for development through agricultural production (Memorial of the Cherokee Indians).
By far, the Indian Removal Act is a very barbarous thing to put our fellow Native Americans through. To begin with, removal of the indians is a very bribing and forceful action. The fact that we would all take the measures to force them off of their land is uncalled for, especially since it is land of their own. We cannot just bribe and trick the tribes for the comfort of ourselves, all stated in Document 6, Senator Peleg Sprague. In Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen, Frelinghuysen’s speech mentions how removal of the tribes would involve, very violent actions and crowded acres as they will be forced onto lands west of the Mississippi.
The Indian Removal Act passed Congress on May 28, 1830 under Andrew Jackson's administration. This Act gave the president the right to negotiate with native tribes in the South and move them to designated lands to preserve their heritage called "reservations". The mentality behind this law centered around the idea that natives were inhabiting American territory and were not citizens or paying taxes. This caused political riffs against some tribes, and caused a series of battles between Americans and native tribes as the tribes were being located to states like Oklahoma and Nebraska. This removal act forever changed how Americans treat natives, and it changed tribal relations.
As the Indians now had land to live on, and didn’t have to worry about maintaining the land as much. The way the Indians were able to have land was because they lived on reservations. Reservations, were controversial, but they did give pretty stable land to the Indians. On the topic of reservations, Bennett Elmer said, “The 1851 Indian Appropriation Acts allocated funds to move Western tribes onto reservations.”
could try to push his agenda to get the Native American out of the East but there was some opposition. The first one was a report from the Committee of Indian Affairs that stated, “They [Cherokees] have called upon the Executive [Andrew Jackson] to make good this guarantee, by preventing this operation in Georgia and Alabama.” What the Cherokee wanted was President Andrew Jackson to honor past treaties in order for them to stay in those respective states. After many debates and arguments in the House of Representatives, the House, passed the act. The Senate passed it and after many debates the House passed the Indian Removal Act With the most controversial law being passed in Congress and the president signing it , there will was a period
The Indian Removal Act was more than slightly controversial with a large number of citizens at the time supporting its passage, there was strong opposition. Many Christian missionaries, along with New Jersey Senator Theodore Frelinghuysen, and Congressman Davy Crockett of Tennessee actively protested the passage and implementation of the Act, but it passed after a bitter struggle in Congress. Jackson called the removal of the tribes inevitable, adamantly saying they were a hindrance to progress, and it was their fate to be moved. Jackson referred to the northern citizens who criticized his decision hypocrites due to the North’s driving Indian tribes to extinction, seizing hunting grounds for their own farms, and state law taking all tribal laws from the Indians. He refused to take into consideration the view of the “lost Indian culture” as a desire by the country to live in a simpler time, insisting progress required forward movement, and saying the Indians stopped that
But there was a handful of people who were against what president Jackson was doing. The most outspoken person against the Indian Removal Act was Davy Crockett. Crockett was at one time in the military serving under President Jackson but after the Indian Removal Act they parted ways. Crockett said if another president was elected who was for the indian removal act then he would move to Texas. So even some of the white man were trying to help the indians out but sadly they weren't able to change
The president during the enforcement of the Indian removal act, Andrew Jackson, thought that the indigenous people were less civilized and moral than the settlers, although many of the tribes had adapted to the European lifestyle. He did not believe that the more “civilized” people should live alongside the indigenous people. When congress passed the Indian removal act in 1830 that stated that it was legal to force indigenous people off of their land, he fully enforced it, pushing tribes west. When there was an auction of Cherokee land, he claimed he couldn 't do anything to stop it, but he didn 't truly want to. The indigenous people wanted to coexist in peace, as Red Jacket stated, “‘You have got our country but are not satisfied; you want to force your religion upon us….
It was Andrew Jackson who administration passed the Indian removal bill which faced stiff resistance in Congress. The humanitarian issues with the political objections nearly defeated the Indian removal bill. Only by dexterously assembling their forces Andrew Jackson's followers barely succeed in passing the Indian removal bill. The Indian removal bill was formally passed on May twenty-six of 1830. The passing of this bill showed the country the mass support the Democrat party had gained.
When the Europeans began colonizing the New World, they had a problematic relationship with the Native Americans. The Europeans sought to control a land that the Natives inhabited all their lives. They came and decided to take whatever they wanted regardless of how it affected the Native Americans. They legislated several laws, such as the Indian Removal Act, to establish their authority. The Indian Removal Act had a negative impact on the Native Americans because they were driven away from their ancestral homes, forced to adopt a different lifestyle, and their journey westwards caused the deaths of many Native Americans.
