ipl-logo

Iran Nuclear Deal Pros And Cons

681 Words3 Pages

An Iran Nuclear Deal has been negotiated for decades; the United Nations Security Council plus Germany (P5+1) and officials from Iran were able to construct a comprehensive nuclear deal. All sides have contributed to one of the greatest foreign policy achievements in recent history. The major issues standing in the way of a functioning comprehensive nuclear deal are sanctions relief, and inspections and verification. The P5+1 collectively believe the multilateral sanctions must be kept to ensure Iranian compliance. The United States of America has to offer sanctions relief that provide Tehran with practical value that will enable Iran to uphold a peaceful nuclear program. Currently, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has multilateral …show more content…

Further, Dershowitz argues that the Iranians would not feel bound to honor its provision regarding centrifuges, inspections, and other constraints. In conclusion, the Iran Nuclear Deal predominantly is an effort by the United Nations to engage Iran into producing a peaceful nuclear program for advances in science and technology. Clearly President Obama wants his major foreign policy achievement to be: choosing peace over war with Iran. Globally, the nuclear deal is an approach based on diplomacy and opposing war, which provides the best hope for improving the human and civil rights for Iranian citizens. Supporters in Iran and other legitimate nation-states believe the nuclear deal is a fundamental way to achieve stability and peace domestically, in Iran, and the latter hopes of spreading peaceful negotiations throughout the Middle East. Violent change rarely improves human and civil rights, while gradual reform has a slower but greater chance of

Show More
Related
1118 Words | 5 Pages

The treaty was signed by Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev. It was to eliminate and control the use of nuclear weapons that could fire long distances. All launchers that had a range of 500-5500 kilometers were to be destroyed. This was effective, but it also came to an end. It got rid of nearly 2,700 missiles.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

Treaty 6 was signed on August 23,1876 at Fort Carlton and less than a month later on September 9, 1876 in Fort Pitt. Some Chief’s had expressed concern regarding being able to sustain this new way of life. They did not want to potentially lose touch with their way of living and the resources their lands possessed. The First Nations people had requested that the government aide their people with agricultural assistance, as well as help during times of famine, and pestilence. The Canadian Government was also asked if they could assist them with modern medicines.

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

In the aftermath of WWII, the US stood as one of the few powers relatively unharmed, as well as the sole nation in possession of nuclear weapons. This afforded the US a great degree of power and leadership in the world. However the USSR was another great power that managed to avoid much destruction from the war, and besides being ideologically opposed, matters were complicated after the USSR developed nuclear weapons for itself. This prompted the formulation of a new foreign policy. Document 7 states that the US “must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination.”

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

Read More
2363 Words | 10 Pages

Jimmy Carter and his advisers believed that many of the traditional rationales that had guided U.S. foreign policy for over a generation were now outmoded and inappropriate to altered world realities.[footnoteRef:10] His most famous mistake and something that is remembered in his legacy was how he handled the Iranian hostage crisis (4th November 1979 to 20th January 1981. It was this crisis that many considered to be the final nail on Carter’s coffin. The crisis initially started due to a Western and Iranian dispute over oil. When Iran elected their new Prime Minister; Muhammad Mossadegh, in 1951, he nationalised the countries oil trade which would alter British and American control over Iran’s investment.

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

Also the way that President John F. Kennedy was able to make a treaty, Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty on July 25, 1963. between the U.S and USSR to make sure both sides aren’t testing nuclear weapons in open air or in the

Read More
1540 Words | 7 Pages

The spread of nuclear weapons is important because the United States can prevent any sort of nuclear conflict. Whether it is the US attacking another country, or another country attacking the US. After a group of Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, the US government was keeping a watchful eye on nuclear proliferation in the United States and in Iran. In January of 1979, Ronald Reagan was in Jacksonville when he made a statement regarding nuclear proliferation in the United States, “‘...Unilaterally the United States seems to be the only nation in the world that’s trying to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons.’” (Rafshoon

Read More
1524 Words | 7 Pages

In terms of U.S. foreign policy, Reagan would now be questioned on how to apply a revitalized containment plan. When it came to dealing with the future relationship between the U.S. and the Soviets, Ambrose indicates how Reagan’s goals were not very different from any previous president. “Reagan’s goals were peace, limitations on the arms race, an actual reduction in the size of nuclear arsenals..” (Ambrose 320). The problem which Ambrose brought up were the means of attaining those goals.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

The idea of change is to make development, or advance toward a better future; however, to create change, society tend to fall under bloodshed. The American Revolution was a step to freedom, but the cause for independence has killed thousands of innocent lives. The result was seen again in the Civil War when the abolishment of slavery ended in destruction. The Revolution and Civil War might differ for whom they’re fighting for, but are similar with their use of violent. Understanding that violent is never the answer, Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights leader, seek a better approach to create change.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Since entering office, President Donald Trump has taken a hostile stance towards Iran, and now threatens to end the era of rapprochement that prevailed during the Obama Administration. This would be a significant mistake that would bode ill for both the United States and Iran. While detractors of President Obama’s policy towards Iran argue that it strengthens the oppressive regime of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the opposite is actually true. Friendly relations between the United States and Iran undermine the fear mongering rhetoric of Khamenei and his hardliner allies and strengthen the arguments of the reformist coalition in Iran. The success of this more moderate faction of Iranians serves United States’ interests in that it eliminates an

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

He even made an agreement with Soviet. This was to get rid of certain nuclear missiles within a specific

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

The United Nations included an executive committee, named the security council, who would directly control UN peacekeeping

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

Established in 1945 after the World War II, United Nations Security Council is the most powerful organ among the six organs in United Nations with the authorized power to issue legally binding resolutions. This council consists of 15 members, 5 Permanent Members – the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia and China – and 10 Non-Permanent Members voted by the UNGA for 2 years term. According to the charter, the responsibility of UNSC is to maintain international peace and security. It determines the threat to peace and act of aggressor; moreover, it investigates any disputes between the UN Member states. The United Nations Security Council also has the military force to prevent or stop the aggressor.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Member of the EU, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, G8 and the United Nations Security

Read More

More about Iran Nuclear Deal Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document