ipl-logo

Iran Nuclear Deal Pros And Cons

681 Words3 Pages

An Iran Nuclear Deal has been negotiated for decades; the United Nations Security Council plus Germany (P5+1) and officials from Iran were able to construct a comprehensive nuclear deal. All sides have contributed to one of the greatest foreign policy achievements in recent history. The major issues standing in the way of a functioning comprehensive nuclear deal are sanctions relief, and inspections and verification. The P5+1 collectively believe the multilateral sanctions must be kept to ensure Iranian compliance. The United States of America has to offer sanctions relief that provide Tehran with practical value that will enable Iran to uphold a peaceful nuclear program. Currently, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has multilateral …show more content…

Further, Dershowitz argues that the Iranians would not feel bound to honor its provision regarding centrifuges, inspections, and other constraints. In conclusion, the Iran Nuclear Deal predominantly is an effort by the United Nations to engage Iran into producing a peaceful nuclear program for advances in science and technology. Clearly President Obama wants his major foreign policy achievement to be: choosing peace over war with Iran. Globally, the nuclear deal is an approach based on diplomacy and opposing war, which provides the best hope for improving the human and civil rights for Iranian citizens. Supporters in Iran and other legitimate nation-states believe the nuclear deal is a fundamental way to achieve stability and peace domestically, in Iran, and the latter hopes of spreading peaceful negotiations throughout the Middle East. Violent change rarely improves human and civil rights, while gradual reform has a slower but greater chance of

Open Document