ipl-logo

Is Napoleon A Hero Or A Villain?

535 Words3 Pages

From early on Napoleon was revered for his immense military prowess, admired for ending the destructive French Revolution. Although Napoleon was a triumphant commander early in his career, his following failures greatly detracted from his initial success. Other than military victories, success can be defined as achieving one’s goals; Napoleon’s main focus was power. Napoleon was extremely hungry for power, ambitiously elevating his position from a soldier to the Emperor of France, a position he created for himself. Napoleon successfully overthrew the dictatorial Directory in 1799, preventing France from falling prey to corrupt leadership. His coup d’etat was happily welcomed by the citizens of France who later supported his vie for First …show more content…

Napoleon was largely seen as a savior after he overthrew the Directory, ending the chaotic French Revolution. However, Napoleon only pretended to cater to the masses, and became dictatorial himself. His obsession with power and domination suggested the despotic tendencies of a villainous leader. Furthermore, Napoleon lost many significant battles during his reign. In the Battle of Trafalgar, he shamefully suffered defeat to French’s nemesis Britain, failing to bring glorious victory to France. He also lost masses of French troops due to his ambitions to the horror of France’s population. Even so, Napoleon seemed largely favorable to the French monarchy. After returning from exile, Napoleon was joyfully welcomed by many who detested the reinstalled monarchy. Viewed as a savior once again, swarms of volunteers joined his army. Even now, Napoleon cannot easily be categorized as a hero or villain as his reputation fluctuated frequently. In fact, the inability to assess his morality contributes to his significance. It can be determined that Napoleon was an incredible leader; he lead his country into many grand battles per his aspirations. He radically changed France’s history through his successes and failures. While neither villainous, heroic, or entirely successful, Napoleon was clearly a remarkable

Show More
Related
574 Words | 3 Pages

But the question is, was Louis Riel really a villain? Executing a man named Thomas Scott, going against the Canadian government, becoming the leader of 2 rebellions made people consider that Louis Riel was a villain, a madman and a traitor. Riel did do some deeds that people considered "unforgivable". But some of the deeds that he did, had a purpose behind them. Louis Riel went against the Canadian government because he was trying to help and support the Metis.

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

Napoleon loved power too much and didn’t care about people. He also only thought of women as a man's way to have babies. Napoleon was also known for making quick and rational decisions that might have not been the best. Napoleon thought of people as actions and not as humans. He often even left the military if many men were dying because he doesn't care about their lives.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

He rebelled because of him and many others, they felt it was the right thing to do. It was in not their intentions to displease or offend the government, they just wanted the rights that they were worthy of. So, to answer the question of was he a hero or a villain, he was both. Whatever anyone thinks of him,

Read More
290 Words | 2 Pages

Hero or Villain You may believe that Andrew Jackson was a hero because he gave money to the states, helped the poor and got America a lot of land. Andrew Jackson was a villain not a hero. He caused the Indian removal Act, Trail of Tears, and the Notification crisis. These are only a few of the horrible things he did. He caused the death of hundreds of Indians.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

Hero or Villain: Andrew Jackson Andrew Jacksons presidenicy was very complicated. He was a man that believed that the white folk should be treated evenly. The poor sohuld get momey like the rich, and the rich should get money the same way as the poor. Being a normal man, the rich disliked him for his opinions that did not fit the rich men and women their needs. The conflict with the Bank, and the Indian Removal act made Jackson a hero in my opinion.

Read More
1378 Words | 6 Pages

He played a major role in the American revolution, including his participation in the capture of the British garrison of Fort Ticonderoga (History.com), intervening in a British invasion of New York at the Battle of Lake Champlain (History.com), and his crucial role in bringing about the surrender of British General John Burgoyne’s army at Saratoga (History.com). Benedict Arnold was a good man who made a huge mistake in 1780. In my opinion Benedict Arnold was a great General, but he surrendered to the British and joined their side, and that’s where he went wrong. He was always a tough general who dove right in and fought for what was right. He was even a part of the Sons of Liberty.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine being alive in a time when more than 40,000 people were beheaded in the name of freedom. That's exactly what happened in the early stages of the French revolution. The French Revolution was a period of drastic social and political change in France and is thought to have been carried forward in the later years by one man, Napoleon Bonaparte. Much controversy surrounds this idea, many say he betrayed the revolution, some say he saved it, and others say the revolution ended before Napoleon's rule even began. The truth is Napoleon Bonaparte was a young man who wished to fulfill the ideals of the revolution at the beginning, with those ideals being equality, liberty, and fraternity in simple terms.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

They also may think he was a hero because of how he fought against his enemies with strength and power. Yet, in my opinion, even though he has done all those great things all the negatives speak louder than the

Read More
133 Words | 1 Pages

He was also elected when he was to do something. He was the most respected leader Americas ever had. The people in Washington State,named it ‘Washington’ in honor of him After the American Revolution, the good people of America, voted him president. After 8 years, every one tried and wanted to elect him again, but Washington said no. Napoleon, on the other hand, was nothing like George Washington.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Napoleon Bonaparte was a well-known military leader that lived from 1769 until 1821. Napoleon moved through the ranks of the military very quickly. By 1802, Napoleon had gained full power over the French government, and by 1804 Napoleon self proclaimed himself Emperor Napoleon I. Through reading and analyzing primary and secondary sources, it is clear as to why Napoleon was so quick to rise to power and what principles of the Revolution Napoleon upheld and which ones he did not.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

He led the French army to many victories from the time he became a commander, and later a general, in the army. These victories include wars in northern Italy and Egypt against the nations who declared

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Atleast he actually opened up education to boys even for those that could not even afford it. Napoleonic code was something that eliminated many injustices. But also it limited free speech and press, and brought back slavery. Soon after that Napoleon elected himself as emperor. Which was actually kind of cool because he sent out a thing for everyone to see if it was a good idea for him to become an emperor or not.

Read More
1330 Words | 6 Pages

He was strong, a man, brave and humble. His particular traits led to him being a better leader and having a better chance of his followers listening to and following his

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

He was a very strong military general, and he extended France power with his “Great Army”. He had brilliant strategies, which helped him win many of his battles such as in Austerlitz and Ulm. He tried to unite Europe, under one French Empire. Napoleon built bridges and canals, that made it easier for people to trade. Some might think that Napoleon took it way too far by attacking Russia which caused him losing a huge amount of his army.

Read More

More about Is Napoleon A Hero Or A Villain?

Related Topics

Open Document