In Nicholas Carr's article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” the author argues that the Internet has become a new form of acquiring knowledge in people’s lives. Additionally, the author supports his own statement by demonstrating that within just a few clicks, one can instantly gain any information or article online without the need to visit and search a physical library. However, even though the Internet ameliorates the quality and quantity of resources to gain knowledge, he believes that as the source of knowledge is replaced by a convenient web page, society becomes easily distracted. In Clive Thompson's article, “Smarter Than You Think.
In Nicholas Carr, Is google making us stupid, He emphasizes on many points,the main point being , how before the creation of the internet people had to spend hours and hours in the libraries looking for the right articles, but now with the creation of the internet things can get done faster and more efficiently. He also he argues that before the creation of the Internet people that loved to read and that had degrees related to reading found themselves less into reading when computers started to make an uprising. He also argues that the internet is being a primary source and now and it’s affecting our reading habits and demolishing our brains. In Clive Thompson, Smarter than you think, He’s trying to convince his readers that the internet
Intro: Humanity is in the middle of a technology revolution and it’s not slowing down anytime soon. Now, more than ever, we communicate across the globe easily. The world is evolving and so are our minds. Nicholas Carr wrote an article for “The Atlantic” discussing the disadvantages of the internet in the modern day academic community. I agree with Carr saying that the internet is changing our minds but unlike Carr, I think our minds are changing for the better and the internet changing what it means to be smart.
The internet has been very beneficial but has taken some incredibly crucial skills. For instance a friend of Carr’s was a lit major and he inctilby found himself in the same problems as Carr the friend saw that “the more they used the web, the more they fight to stay focused on a piece of text”(5). A person who used to be a “Various Reader” lost the ability to read, it's just crazy to see how much the internet can affect you. I mean for god sakes if person who dedicated his life to literature lost the ability to read something then you can truly see how the internet has affected us. Sadly I must admit i have the same problems as Carr's friend and Carr i too have the lost the ability to read and even though i am no lit major i spent years learning not only to read but to read at a high level and now i have lost that.
Every day the world is being introduced to new technology to make life easier for people. In the article, “Is google making us stupid”, author Nicholas Carr tells us about how he believes that the internet is making us stupid by changing the way our brain processes information. Carr begins to tell us how the web is causing these issues such as how he can no longer be occupied in a book for a long period of time. He then starts to talk about how his whole life is surrounded by the internet and that is to blame for the problem he has with being able to stay focused while reading; but he also talks about how at the same time the internet benefited him so much because he is a writer. When reading this article, you can see that Carr uses a lot of
According to the article 2, Peter Norvig states, “Access to the Internet's information lets us think better and faster. By considering a wide range of information, we can arrive at more creative and informed solutions. ”Without a doubt, this proves that the access to the internet is making us smarter; furthermore, it actually helps us in school instead of hurting us. In addition, this implies that we should be using technology at school and should not be participating in “shut down your screen week”.
Harris is embracing the benefits of technology and how it is leading to students becoming more proficient in their studies, leading them to retaining more information while also being engaged. The narrative approach Carr takes prompts reflection on the effects of technology on cognition but may lack generalizability. For example, Carr highlights, "Anecdotes alone don't prove much." And we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition" (Carr). The author makes note that although there is research on the subject, there is more information to be found to determine if and how the internet affects the body.
People who always use search engines can become very good at finding information, but not remembering it. In addition, children who use too much technology may not have enough opportunities to read, use their imagination, and think deeply about material. Also, technology can contribute to the risk of obesity, the more technology we use the less exercise we
The statement Friar Lawrence made about the “two opposing camps” of good and evil in all living things is very true not only in this story, but in life as well. Anything can have two sides, both good and bad. In the book, we see many different perspectives shown from different people and events. Mercutio was shown to be gentle, kind, and peaceful, never liked to get into fights or arguments with the Capulets was later caught up in a fight with Tybalt in which he was killed.
Nicholas Carr began by stating through personal experiences how surfing the web changes the way we process and receive information suggesting that Internet’s use chips away the capacity for concentration and contemplation. He then supported his claim by mentioning the hardships his friends are facing too. Unfortunately, providing personal opinions might not be valid in this case but rather null and void. In fact, he himself states that these are anecdotes and that further research and experiments are required to prove how Internet use negatively affects cognition. That said, a UCLA study in 2008 found that Internet searching may improve brain function and thus have a constructive impact on cognition.
Although, the internet actually brings numerous advantages to its users. It has a wide advantage in the education system. In the Pew survey, which was done in conjunction with the College Board and the National Writing Project, roughly 75 percent of 2,462 teachers surveyed said that the Internet and search engines had a “mostly positive” impact on student research skills. And they said such tools had made students more self-sufficient researchers (Richtel). Many teachers said that the Internet could be a useful in education for enhancing the student’s ability to make research and explore.
Clay Shirky, the author of “Does the internet make you smarter?” wrote about how ignorance has poisoned the internet with incorrect information. Not only does technology has its flaws, but so do books and novels dating back to the Protestant Reformation. Even though many people are against the internet Shirky reassures that if used correctly and appropriately, then it can become a very useful tool that can “tap our cognitive surplus”. The increased collaboration of technology is important to society for the reason that the internet is full of valuable knowledge that can be claimed very quickly and easily. Increased collaboration is absolutely a benefit.
Today's technology can help us learn outside the classroom easier than before. In a paper by Joerg Landy, he states that "people use the internet to extend their own mind beyond their skulls." The amount of information on the internet abounds what we could simply find in a text book. Going out and seeking information helps us expand our knowledge. Another article author AJ Agrawal says that we absorb what we read and look up.
Sue Honoré, an independent learning consultant who has studied people who were born from 1982 to 2002 has that “while young people are "undoubtedly capable of long periods of concentration", those who spend a lot of time alone using technology tend to have less in the way of communication skills, self-awareness and emotional intelligence”. It has been proven that around 31 nations that students who used computers everyday in class had lower test scores in reading and math than students who don’t use them as much (Study: Students Who Use in School Doesn’t Help Test Scores). Though technology is amazing and has given so many people different opportunities they would’ve never had before it is resulting in a few bad habits for students. Casey Schools systems around the United States have begun to rely on technology to teach their students instead of teachers to teach them. According Michael Godsey, a veteran high-school English educator, even said and agreed with many people today that we are at the point in time where since we have the internet at our fingertips, there is really no need for teachers
Many critics may argue and say that technology in education is dangerous. It can waste a students’ time by getting him or her sidetracked by distractions they find online. However when students avoid technology in education, they have to spend long hours, days, maybe even weeks searching for certain information in various different books. Students that really want to learn will force discipline upon themselves. Even if students didn’t use technology, anything could easily distract them when studying.
