ipl-logo

Jean Jacques Rousseau's Arguments Against Compassion

1289 Words6 Pages

The topic of compassion is an important element that affects our lives every day. Many philosophers have conjured their outlines for and against compassionate behavior. If we examine the philosophical approaches of compassion as a whole, rather than siding with which beliefs are thought to be right/wrong, humanity will begin to tear down their bias notions and reconstruct a strong, functioning, and united society. In this essay, Jean Jacques Rousseau and the Dalai Lama help explain the understandings and workings of compassion and why they believe it is the best moral practice. After their views have been stated, Theodor Adorno is introduced to argue against the unanimity for compassion as he believes it fails to address the underlying problems …show more content…

As Rousseau would argue that compassion results in reduced suffering and creates moral attachments between race, cultures, and classes (Ivanovic). For example, the practice of compassion for Rousseau helps tear down the disunion between the diverse influences of social status, environment, and convention. Conventional differences such as strong, weak, rich, poor, Christian, Muslim, etc.. (“Compassion and its Discontents”). Not only can compassion be a moral practice for an individual but rather a political outline. Rousseau believes compassion supports individuals along with institutions in the recognition of shared assumptions about what a human being’s life entails (“Compassion and its Discontents”). A more in-depth understanding of this idea leads us to think of these shared assumptions as an overall formation for a general concept of humanity. This development results from a “domino effect” of compassionate traits being spread from one individual to the next, leading to a somewhat systemized frame of human moral behavior. These humanitarian ideas for compassion propel understanding for why conventional differences lead to cruelty, ignorance, and even tragedies (“Compassion and its …show more content…

Rousseau and the Dalai Lama both generate powerful and significant exchanges for the settlement of compassion. Similarly, Adorno’s views cohere to many people and societies. Although both positions have their strengths and weaknesses, it is thoughtless, leisurely, and erroneous to side with only one of the arguments. The answer to the discussion for or against compassion will never be left or right but rather a stance somewhere in-between. There will always be circumstances in which siding with Rousseau/Dalai or Adorno will be the correct moral choice; it is up to the people to break free from the bias restraints of one moral philosophy or the other, and formulate a logical decision based on the contexts of the given situation.
In conclusion, Rousseau’s stance on compassion as a tool that helps unite and create moral attachments between humans is strong. On the contrary Adorno’s judgement of compassion as an irrational emotion that fails to undertake the hidden problems of society also has positive concepts. However, if societies begin to look at the many philosophical beliefs of compassion as a whole, humanity begins to function and coexist at the best possible

Show More
Related
379 Words | 2 Pages

The short story" On Compassion" by Barbara Lazear appeared after her book " Playing After Dark (1986)". This short story argues that people are not born with compassion. Throughout the book Lazear gave examples to determine if the situation was out of compassion or fear. The author also, gives information about the Greeks and she states how it can be a possibilities the Greeks had compassion within a society to teach people to have sympathy for people suffering. Although, other's may voice their opinion to being born with compassion, I initiate to include evidence from the text to prove that compassion needs to be taught to people and there is no possible way that they are born with compassion.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

Ascher believed that compassion is something humans are not born

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

In Barbara Lazear Ascher’s essay titled “On Compassion” Ascher considers the concept of compassion by utilizing her own encounters with the homeless as a vehicle to make her argument. In her argument, she interprets compassion as an abstract concept, and portrays empathy as a building block to compassion; making the argument that to be a more tolerant society one must first learn empathy in order to demonstrate true compassion. When analyzing Ascher’s rhetoric, her style, diction and rhetorical devices reveal a skeptical tone and serve a greater purpose in appealing to the reader’s sense of ethos and pathos. Namely, Ascher’s use of first-person narrative and word choice like “we” appeals to the reader’s sense of ethos, which eventually builds

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

Compassion can be defined as "sympathetic pity and concern for the sufferings or misfortunes of others. " It is an essential piece to a more united world. A book that stresses this idea is just mercy. In the book just mercy, lawyer Bryan Stevenson emphasizes the importance of compassion towards others by using strong examples of injustice and personal perspectives, ultimately moving the readers to show compassion to those around them.

Read More
1156 Words | 5 Pages

Ascher believes that no one is born to have compassion and empathy for people, for example, homelessness. Although it can be learned. Ascher state’s an example that ancient Greeks drama brought back compassion in a society by giving inspiration to the audience that

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Macey Martin English 2P Ms. Kilba 05/12/2023 Night Synthesis Throughout history, individuals have faced the moral dilemma of whether or not to help those in danger. While some argue that it is a moral obligation to help others in need, others believe it is not always the individual's responsibility. After analyzing “Night”, "First They Came For the Communists”, "The Perils of Indifference”, and a couple of others' thoughts, it is evident that individuals have a moral obligation to help others who are in danger, regardless of their own personal circumstances. Whether it is a matter of life or death, our human nature compels us to act compassionately and offer assistance.

Read More
277 Words | 2 Pages

This chapter shows how the quality of human life is dependent upon intentions and heart, rather than the status of a

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout countless lives, conflict is regarded as a common fact of life that one must endure. People must learn to handle stress and pressure while also being open to the ideas and feelings of others. Many more people over the years have tried to decipher the best way to deal with these unfortunate happenings and some have come within the smaller measure to achieving the great feat. While this may be a complicated and sinuous road to travel, the benefits of various practices can add amazing improvement to one’s way of living and can even help others in order to benefit all of society. Perhaps the best way to deal with conflict is to simply not give up or not stay silent when conflict and wrongdoings are happening such as in “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat” by Winston Churchill and in “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech” by Elie Wiesel and perhaps a closer look must be taken at how these methods affect the situation, how they affect those involved, and how this can help with a person’s emotional well-being.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Compassion is obtained from others. Depending on the circumstances, some people acquire compassion, and others do not. Mayella Violet Ewell, an 18-year-old white female, in Harper Lee’s, To Kill A Mockingbird, falsely accuses Tom Robinson, a black man, of sexually assaulting her, which commences a court case in the town of Maycomb, Alabama. Mayella has a tough life at home because of how her father treats her, and her overall reputation in the town of Maycomb is terrible, and she is considered white trash because she does not go to school and lives in bad conditions. Mayella Ewell deserves compassion because of her lack of knowledge.

Read More
1648 Words | 7 Pages

On the other hand, Werther takes an extremely Romantic approach, with his life and experiences demonstrating the limitations of a rational society. In Discourse on the Origin of Moral Inequality, Rousseau rationally determines that the emergence of society and the invention of property directly cause moral inequality between people, specifically, the rich and the poor. First, he establishes the state of nature as a basic system, with no complex morality or rationality involved, unlike the states of nature described by Hobbes and Locke. At the most fundamental degree, Rousseau places mankind at the same level as other animals.

Read More
1760 Words | 8 Pages

Nevertheless, it can be concluded that his claim on animals living better lives than human beings is to some considerable extent true. The view of aestheticism for battling suffering is, however, not factual. Schopenhauer failed to acknowledge the great significance that people’s will portrays i.e. their existence. The idea of weakening the desires of the will do not necessarily eliminate the suffering that people witness in their daily lives. In general, despite the suffering that surrounds people, life is believably good.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Honduras is located in the heart of Central America, with a population of about 8.5 million inhabitants (source). Although in the past decade the economy had been improving, various political anomalies have been shaking the economy lately. It is known to everyone that Honduras is a third world country and that it has some serious poverty issues. Poverty is highly denoted in the rural areas of the country. This problem affects about 60 % of the population and there are many private and non-profit organizations that want to help lower this percentage.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

An example for a claim such as this one would be that a person wants to be liked or loved by an individual’s acts of kindness and for the person that individual is, not for being liked or loved for looks or monetary expressions (Garrett). I argue that explaining the wrongness of killing by means of rights in which are given or not given to a fetus is unjustifiable because abortion cases still occur in both sides of the debate of whether it is permissible or not. I make this claim because some individuals who agree with the wrongness of killing still resort to abortion methods to either save the mother or because of their financial

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

Worksheet #5 Mohandas K Gandhi argues that nonviolence is the path for a long term solution and for reaching our goal. He also explains civilization as not a benefit but instead a disaster and dangerous, that it builds laziness and hard work for the low class. He further explains that one side benefits in a greedy matter but the other side is left bare. Additionally, Dietrich Bonhoeffer describes the difference between cheap grace and costly grace.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

SUMMARY Thinking Like a Mountain is a phase used in he book “A Sand County Almanac” by the famous author Aldo Leopold. Aldo Leopold is considered to be a renowned ecologist and a forester who taught Wildlife Management at the University of Wisconsin. He was considered to be one of the foremost writers in America. Thinking Like a Mountain is a narration of the Leopold when he first time watched a wolf die and he wonders what the mountains might know which the other people never realized.

Read More

More about Jean Jacques Rousseau's Arguments Against Compassion

Related Topics

Open Document