ipl-logo

Was John Brown A Terrorist

763 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Slave rrights in the american revolution

Terrorist
John Brown can be portrayed as a heroic freedom fighter that selflessly fought for the enslaved Africans in the United States of America, but however his righteous actions can be observed as acts of terrorism. John Brown is often misrepresented as a noble hero and should be shown as blood thirsty killer. He slaughtered people in the name of freedom for the slaves. He captured an armory, and other military buildings and gave out guns to the slaves so that they could rise up against the enslavers. He then held people hostage and killed off the people that fought against him. He was then brought to court and received a death sentence. John Brown is not a hero but a villain because of his terroristic actions. John Brown implies that he just wanted to free the slaves and that …show more content…

Lee’s report on the situation paints John Brown as a criminal. He has reported that John Brown had taken over armory, he sent out men to capture important people, and had the slaves join his cause. The men led by John Brown used hostages to secure a safe escape from the soldiers, this show that John Brown is not a hero because he put innocent lives at risk. Moreover, Robert E. Lee offered that if John Brown surrendered to their terms, because he did not want the hostages to get hurt, and as he predicted they did not surrender, which lead to their doom. John Brown lead a charge against the soldiers and killed their officer, this action contradicts John Brown statement of not wanting to kill people it shows the opposite because of his front line position. The raid happened because John Brown opposed the soldiers by attacking them, and the soldiers were ordered to kill them if they showed aggression. He could have avoided this bloodshed if he just followed their commands, but he did not because he desperately wanted his abolitionist views to take action in the South. This article shows that John Brown is a killer that jeopardised innocent people and his own men for his

Show More
Related
525 Words | 3 Pages

John Brown killed half of an innocent family who did not own slaves because they were pro-slavery. John Brown was an abolitionist who killed many people. John Brown also committed treason. This topic is important because John Brown started the civil war, so it is important to know about him if he was a hero or villain. John Brown was a villain because he killed innocent people, he committed treason, and he was very untrustworthy.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

“Midnight Rising: John Brown and the Raid that Sparked the Civil War” is written by Tony Horwitz. Horwitz is a bestselling author and a Pulitzer Prize-winner who worked for The Wall Street Journal. Throughout the book, Horwitz tells the story of a man named John Brown, who was an abolitionist and leader of many riots and raids that influenced the Civil War. Horwitz’s thesis is that John Brown had a significant impact on the events leading up to the Civil War, particularly the raid on Harpers Ferry. John Brown was born to a deeply religious family in 1800 in Torrington, Connecticut.

Read More
373 Words | 2 Pages

Nat Turner and John Brown are both noted, as being symbols of American reform. Leaders of abolitionist groups, who went on a killing spree believing they were given “extraordinary powers from above” and were executed for their strong beliefs of anti-slavery. Their gruesome murders could easily attract followers and spark interest in others to write their biographies. John Brown and Nat turner both came from strong religious backgrounds.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

(Document F) Since he lied about almost everything, that is another reason to believe he is a villain. Even though he was facing death, he could have told the truth and tried to tone it down, not lie about everything. He also ended up saying something that would be completely contradicted in a later letter to his friend. Finally, he tried to start a revolt/civil war. In document G and H, it proves that John Brown WAS trying to start a revolt, despite what he said in F. He said, in a letter to his friend, that he “wanted to put the slaves in a condition to defend liberties” (Document G), which translates to putting the slaves in a place where they can fight back, or in other words, he was supplying them with

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

When they arrived in Lawrence, Kansas they overturned the town, destroyed many printing presses, and burned down the “Governor’s” house. The violence in Kanas began in 1854 and continued thru 1861. When the attack on Lawrence is answered by John Brown and his four sons and few others on the anti-slavery side strike back. They attack several pro slavery settlers at Pottawatomie and

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

A Hero in Disguise John Brown, some say that he is a cold blooded killer. Others say he is a hero to the nation. And he is a hero to the nation John Brown was a man who believed in his own personal beliefs. His beliefs were that every man is equal. And that slavery was wrong and he felt like he was meant to be the one to stop slavery in its tracks.

Read More
85 Words | 1 Pages

I think John Brown was a hero, because he tried to find ways to free slaves. Even though he killed people or got people killed in the process, he still was trying his best to help free slaves. Supplying the slaves with weapons was a good idea, but did not turn out they way he wanted. Everyone messes up, but he still had this plan to try and help free slaves.

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

The men he took five unarmed men and boys believed to have slaves and brutally murdered them. After that Brown, raided Missouri freeing eleven slaves and killing the slave owner. John Brown believed that Slavery was wrong, so he took an approach of killing slave owners. He took action but it wasn’t responsible, he did it in a way that could and would quickly create more issues. In 1859 John Brown, under the alias Isaac Smith, rented a Kentucky Farmhouse.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

The second reason, John Brown led a revolt. “These men are all talk, what we need is action, action!” John Brown said before He and his men (in October 16, 1859) raided the Federal Arsenal armory, and as a result, shook the south. Upon hearing he was going to be hung he stated: “…if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments--I submit; so let it be done!”

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

He saw the wrong in owning slaves. He believed what he was doing and what he believed in was right not wrong. He was hung with the pleasure of knowing he made an impact on the world. John Brown tried very hard to do anything to please god and free slaves.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

John Brown was a man with a strong hatred for slavery who tried to lead a rebellion against it. After this he was called a “misguided fanatic” by Abraham Lincoln. Which leaves the question, was John Brown a “misguided fanatic”? I think John Brown was a misguided fanatic, or according to dictionary.com a, mistaken person with an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm, because he was so set in his rebellion that his mind couldn’t be changed even when told his plan wouldn’t go well, and although he was told his actions would be fatal he went on to do so . In The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass, Douglass states that there was no changing Brown

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

George Fitzhugh claimed that "The Negro slaves of the South are the happiest the freest people in the world." (Document H). John Brown a major person in the fight to end slavery "led a band of 18 men into Virginia to seize the federal arsenal there, distribute the captured arms to slaves in the area, and create a general slave uprising." (Document I).John Brown was executed and the aftermath of his death made tensions rise betwwen the North and South. "

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

John Brown, a notable abolitionist of the 1850s, has been the subject of debate between many historians. People have viewed him either as a martyr, a terrorist, or a mix of both, but despite that, bias plays a key role in determining one’s opinion of him. For example, there is a youtube video called, “John Brown Explained: US history review,” by Hip Hughes. Hughes in his video repeatedly refers to John Brown as a “badass. This suggests Brown to be a tough guy who did what we wanted.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

Looking at what he has fought for, it’s no doubt that he fought for a noble cause which is the freedom of slavery. John Brown shouldn’t be known as hero or terrorists because of want he has done applies to both sides. John Brown shouldn’t be known as a terrorist or a national hero because of his violent attack and raids. After, September 11, 2001 John Brown has been called a terrorist which has caused controversy about Brown’s legacy and reputation. Furthermore, in the article, The 9/11 of 1859 says, “He led 21 men all but two in their 20s, and many of them radicalized by guerilla fighting in Bleeding Kansas, the abolitionists’ Afghanistan”(Horowitz).

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

John Brown was an individual that arose many strong opinions toward himself. There was many citizens, mostly Southerners that despised John Brown because of the inhuman and barbaric murders. The Northerners on the other hand, view Brown as a hero that risked his life to take away the lives of cruel slave owners. To them this was the kick start they needed to begin fighting in the anti- slavery movement. The North was disgusted with the South because they took Africans away from their homes in other countries, brought them to a different country and claimed them as their own.

Read More

More about Was John Brown A Terrorist

Related Topics

Open Document