John Brown should be considered a traitor for three reasons, he killed five people, he led a revolt, and he armed slaves.
The first reason, John Brown killed five people. He, in cold blood killed 5 white men in a field for what? Owning slaves? Not necessarily hurting, or abusing them. Just owning them. There is no real logical explanation for what he did other than simply his thinking wasn’t right. He led both his sons into battle, and his obvious obsession of ending slavery some think, made him go insane.
The second reason, John Brown led a revolt. “These men are all talk, what we need is action, action!” John Brown said before He and his men (in October 16, 1859) raided the Federal Arsenal armory, and as a result, shook the south. Upon hearing he was going to be hung he stated: “…if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments--I submit; so let it be done!” he was hung on December 2, 1859. and no one lifted a finger to help him.
…show more content…
He was arrogant, and he thought he was invincible as long as the north supported him. John Brown should have been considered a terrorist, because he (in cold blood) murdered 5 people in a field, he led a revolt, and he armed