John Lewis Business Model Essay

Mother, whoever can get 25% off most John Lewis products and 15% in Waitrose and there are half price theatre, concert tickets, subsidies for whatever educational or leisure course they want to follow and a raft of sabbatical and extended leaves possibilities. It is not easy to find an unhappy John Lewis partner, despite the fact that they stay with the company twice as long as the industry average, because if anyone is unhappy about something, they have a responsibility to do something about it.
Which brings to the man who invented the John Lewis model, Born in 1885,John Spedan Lewis was a radical with the means to do something about it, there were plenty in the early 20th century (and for that matter, now) who believed. Like him that the

And a responsibility in the running of it over to the people employed within, what does that responsibility Mean, company ask not that staff do their job, but they can play an active role as an owner and that they can engage with colleagues and work with them in thinking through what will make the business successful. John Lewis shareholder aren’t passive and distant, they have lots of opinions, those opinions are voiced through democratic channels, the chairman and board run the company commercial activities, 82 members partnership council elects nearly half the board and in theory, can sack the chairman and the partnership council itself is largely elected through a network of forums representing every department of every John Lewis, as there is a feeling of equality, you belong to the business, but it belongs to you

In theory, public services are fertile terrain for co-ownership, a great way to harness the strong vocational commitment in the sector, in practice, reckons Nigel Mason, policy director of the employee ownership association, it raises a multitude of question about how it could relay be made to work.
Also, politicians like the sound of employee ownership, Manson says, despite increased expenditure, public services continues to fall and they are really need to increase engagement, motivation and provide a better services to the user. Westminster also like the notion that with public service spending cuts inevitable, co-ownership would be a nice