ipl-logo

John Locke's Principles Of Government From The Declaration Of Independence

706 Words3 Pages

There are many principles of government from the Declaration of Independence that are still valid today. One principle is that all persons are rightfully sovereign over their own affairs, which do not infringe upon the rights of others. This principle is still valid because we should have rights and ownership to our own property, and no one should be able to take that property away. It makes sure that what you own doesn’t affect other people, and protects their property as well. The government created to protect the rights of the people, and is consented by the governed, is also an important principle. Government that consents to the wants and needs of the citizens, and is assembled for the sole purpose of protecting the people, keeps residents …show more content…

Locke’s ideas were used in the Declaration of Independence, explaining why Americans opposed British rule. The king of Britain did not acknowledge the rights of the colonists, and imposed taxes and formed new laws without the agreement from the colonists to do so. John Locke believed that the duty of a government is to protect the natural rights of the people. These natural rights were the rights to life, liberty, and property. If a government failed to protect those rights, the citizens would have the right to overthrow the government. Most of the ideas in the Declaration of Independence were also used in the Constitution, which was put into effect in 1789. John Locke’s ideas are what influenced the thoughts and ideas of the Founding …show more content…

Bakke (1978) stated that the supreme court struck down on certain types of race-based preferences in state college admissions as violating the equal protection clause. This made it easier for minorities to be accepted to colleges. Sixteen out of one hundred seats were reserved for minority applicants, which were Blacks, Asians, Chicanos, and Native Americans. A white applicant named Allan Bakke, was denied admission twice, despite having a higher GPA and MCAT score than some of the minority applicant who were accepted admission. This is discrimination because applicants were accepted just because of their race, which goes against the 14th amendment. Sure it creates diversity, but a student who is more deserving to go to a prestigious school shouldn’t be denied a spot because he isn’t a minority. Bakke won the case and a spot in the university, and the Supreme Court invalidated the school’s special admissions program. Now all students are equally likely to be accepted into a state

Show More
Related
601 Words | 3 Pages

SUMMARY In this landmark case Allan Bakke, a white applicant to the University of California, Davis Medical School, sued claiming his denial of admission on racial grounds was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The standing rule at the time was that race may be a factor in determining admission to educational institutions; however it cannot be the sole determining factor. FACTS OF THE CASE The University of California, Davis Medical School had been reserving 16 spots in each class out of 100 for disadvantaged minorities.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Up and until this point in time, the court has generally ruled that promoting educational diversity is in fact a compelling state objective, but in today’s America, educational diversity has been established and is thriving. In this day and age, using race as a factor in college admissions is not needed. The Fourteenth amendment ensures the equal protection of the law to each and every citizen. We may not discriminate in order to promote

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

The Supreme Court made a mistake when they decided with the University of Texas; no college should take in race as a factor when selecting applications of students. In 2007, two female high school students applied to the University of Texas; one of the girls being Miss Abigail N. Fisher. Abigail was a caucasian, in the top 12% of her school at Stephen Austin High School, but she was denied by the University of Texas along with a friend of her’s. However,

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

He did not understand why he was not being admitted into the University while blacks, Asians, and other minorities were being excepted when they were plainly just not as smart as Allan. The lower court ruled that the special admissions program violated the state and federal constitutions and was illegal. Race should not be a deciding factor in the admissions process. But the lower court also ruled that Allan Bakke should not be admitted into the University of California because he failed regular admissions.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

The Fisher v. University of Texas Supreme Court Case (argued in 2015) involves how race affects college admissions and how a certain student reacted to it. The purpose of the article is to inform the audience about the use of race in college admissions without considering the effect on the students. The argument made in the article is that the documentation of race does not violate any laws declared in the United States Constitution (“Fisher v. University of Texas”). A white female student, Abigail Fisher, was denied admission to the University of Texas because she did not qualify for the Top Ten Percent Plan.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university 's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school 's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances. " The college was asked to at least consider blacks in the admittance of college and they were asked to not use quotas in the admission

Read More
1677 Words | 7 Pages

The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.

Read More
72 Words | 1 Pages

John Locke was an extremely intelligent philosopher whose ideas about government and natural rights paved the way for the American Revolution. Locke was born in 1632. In the 1600s, the ideal form of government was monarchy which Locke most definitely opposed. He was a strong believer in representative democracy based off of what the people thought was right. Locke supported something called social construct theory which guaranteed natural rights for all

Read More
1496 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court case of The Regents of the University of California versus Bakke questioned the use of affirmative action in applications. The medical school of the University of California at Davis reserved sixteen out of one hundred seats of every entering class for minorities (Blacks, Chicanos, Asians, and American Indians) (Banfield pg.82). Allan Bakke a white male in his mid-thirties was twice denied access to the University strictly based on quotas, although Bakke had MCAT scores and GPA higher than other minority applicants admitted (McBride par.3). Bakke would later sue The University of California on the basis that the school had violated the civil rights act of 1964.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Locke’s ideas from the Two Treatises of Government and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, were based upon the natural rights where power comes from the people. Both of his pieces contributed to revolutions, most importantly the American Revolution as power from monarchies was removed and democracies were created. Allowed for limited government power and all obligations were to the citizens. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding basis was on how the knowledge existence of God, certain moral truths, and laws of logic or mathematics pertained to the natural rights of

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

John Locke discusses within in his book, “Second Treatise of Government,” the concepts of natural rights of individuals as well as the legitimate exercise of political power. Within his writing, Locke links his abstract beliefs to a theory of personal property wholly protected from governmental invention. This joining of ideas helps Locke make an argument against absolutism and unjust governments. In addition to his argument, Locke aims to explain how he believes that people have the right to rebel against their own government. In fact, he promotes people to rebel against their own government because everyone should have a government that they trust.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

John Locke was a philosopher and political scientist. He had many interests and produced a number of writings that influenced future leaders. One of these leaders was Thomas Jefferson, who was involved with the aid of America and the act gaining independence from Britain. The Declaration of Independence and Locke’s views on government contain many similar aspects. These ideas includes the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (natural rights); the protection that is provided by the government for these rights; and the altering or abolishment of government if it fails to provide and protect the rights of the people.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

The Founding Fathers rebelled against the British government for good reasons, which led to the American Revolution in 1783. The Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling against the Britain because the government was not protecting the rights of the citizens, taxing the colonists, and forced them to house British soldiers. In 1756 Britain put the first tax on the colonists. This was the Stamp Act, it required colonists to pay taxes on certain items such as newspapers, legal documents, licenses, and even playing cards.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

The six basic principles of government apply to the three branches of government by establishing itself as a foundation for the three branches. Each of the six principles is the backboard in which everything that is done is based upon the rules and ideas the principles acknowledge. If these ethics were nonexistent, the branches would be unsystematic. The logic behind the importance of the principles of government would be the fact that they make sure that our government will not be too powerful and that it will not be able to take our rights away from us very easily. Adjoining to this concept, the popular sovereignty principle is brought up because this is what allows the people of a region or state to create and sustain the authority of a government, and all elected representatives are the major source of political power.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

These few paragraphs will talk about why I chose John Locke and why people do not need a strong government to guide us through our life and tell us what is wrong and right. Firstly, i chose John Locke as the philosopher I agree with because John Locke says that people have a natural good human nature, but believes that selfish and greedy were also a part of human nature and needed a government to remind us of what is good and bad. Human nature is a unique characteristic that includes the way we feel, think or act. Human nature can also result in good or bad decisions that's we make. People are more tempted to do worse things than good things because I feel that it is much easier to do worse than good.

Read More

More about John Locke's Principles Of Government From The Declaration Of Independence

Related Topics

Open Document