Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note about julius caesar
Julius caesar dialectical jounral
Short note about julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note about julius caesar
Julius caesar dialectical jounral
Short note about julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
However, during Caesars command, the Senate
Name: Alexander Palma, Ethan Thorpe, Cody Mullinix Julius Caesar: Hero or Tyrant? Short Argumentative Writing Organizer Topic: Julius Caesar’s Impact on the Roman Republic Big Historical Question: Was Julius Caesar a hero or a tyrant? Claim Statement State your position on whether Julius Caesar was a Roman hero or tyrant.
Who was Julius Caesar was he a hero or a villain? Julius Caesar was a hero to many plebeians because he made many great accomplishments of the government , Rome, and for the poor. Some people might think he was a villain, but some people think differently. First of all, Julius Caesar did many great effects to Rome. Julius gave land to the landless, like the poor and veterans who didn’t have land before.
Was Julius Caesar the greatest man Rome has ever known, or is he one of the greatest tyrants? There is a thin line between hero and tyrant, and it is difficult to distinguish what side Julius Caesar falls. Generally, if Julius Caesar was compared to any major political figure nowadays, he would be seen in a tyrannical light. These were clearly different times and the law had different practices back then such as slavery. From his peers/upper class’s point of view he is reckless and selfish, while really he is just trying to give back to the lower class.
The evidence from the readings proves that Julius Caesar was a tyrant. The people of Rome said that they never wanted a dictator. In other words, they didn’t want to be ruled by someone else. Julius Caesar was a threat to the democracy of Rome. He wanted to be dictator for life, and wouldn’t let anyone else rule Rome.
This should not have happened to Julius Caesar after all he did for Rome and its
Julius Caesar is being praised by the public in a conversation by Brutus, Casca, and Cicero who think that he was being humble just for the attention. They were laughing and agreeing at the fact that he rejected the crown twice and accepted thrice after being so humble for the public at the square. He is a great leader by example if he was humble and rejected the crown until he was ready by making the public cheer him on to accept it as he can time it perfectly to control the crowd of civilians and pedestrians. They seemed to think his falling sickness, or epilepsy was being faked as he falls and sometimes foams at the mouth as if he has rabies. Marullus and Flavius are executed for being petty and removing the scarves off of Caesar’s statues
Succeeding in having all of Gaul under Roman control, Caesar proved himself to be a great ruler and achieved a very high reputation as a strong leader. He was also admired by his army for being ready to sacrifice and go through any hardships and overcome all obstacles for the sake and welfare of Rome. Being favored and admired by the army was one of the main reasons that triggered the senate's fear of his escalating power. However, things began to gradually deteriorate and gravitate towards a civil war. The senate managed to pull Pompey towards them and stimulate tension between him and Caesar; to take things up a notch Crassus died leaving only Pompey and Caesar to each other.
The people of Rome along with the conspirators convinced him to kill his former friend, Caesar. His last words before killing Caesar were “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (III.II.19-24) This shows that he cared more about the society and people of Rome, than his friend. It also shows how they could influence him to turn against his friend.
Individuals, such as Cassius and Brutus, in the senate were afraid of having their power decreased because Caesar, as Brutus states, is an “unhatched serpent’s egg” (Act 2, Scene 1, Line 33). Caesar has the potential of becoming a danger in the senate members point of view due to the fact that Caesar is gaining all the glory from the Plebeians and being compared to a god. Many of the Plebeians do not respect or think highly of the senate members as in Act 1, Scene 1 the cobbler uses puns and jokes to address Murellus and Flavius. Thus, Caesar was murdered out of fear and jealousy and not his rising power and therefore making his murder not
Caesar was being a tyrant which means he wanted power, fame, fortune and he wouldn’t stop until he got what he
Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.
An account written by Suetonius says that “ Caesar urged them rather to propose to the people that he be permitted to stand for a second consulship
In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to
Sin’s Perpetrator and Victim Human desire knows no bounds; everyone thirsts for something. Some thirst for power, some for wealth, and others for truth. This thirst is a driving factor for most actions, but it is not always for the best. Nowhere else are the dangers of wanting more prevalent than in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. The underlying premise of the play is that one’s own ambition can end up destroying him/her and creating unintended chaos.