ipl-logo

Kantian Duty-Based Ethics Of Torture

586 Words3 Pages

Torture is when an individual or group of individuals cause harm, severe pain on someone while they force the person to speak or do something unwillingly. However, in America, individuals are protected by torture, because of the Bill of Rights. According to Luban, (2007) “Our Bill of Rights forbids cruel and unusual punishment, and that has come to include all forms of corporal punishment except prison and death by methods purr-ported to be painless” (p. 249). Unfortunately, there are many horror stories throughout history that has barbaric and terrible act upon people, because there were people at times who justified torture during certain situations. In such situation as a terrorist attack, an individual may feel that the torture would be justified in order to stop the attack in order to save millions or thousands of lives, may be a justified torture. Overall, it would depend on the individual’s stance on the subject that would include their ideology, values, and morals.
Utilitarianism is when the best outcome is maximum by the number of people. According to Holmes (2007), “the utilitarian is concerned with maximizing the benefits for the maximum number of people” (pg. 43). This viewpoint, utilitarian would be able to justify torture in order to save the lives that could …show more content…

The main focus would be on the whether a duty or moral law was fulfilled during the situation. This principle would allow someone to follow the orders of someone in a high command position, or authority role. The torture of this individual would be justified in this situation. In addition, virtue ethics focuses on individuals’ moral character and is based on person based and not on action based. An example would be a person has moral disposition, very civic oriented, and patriotic then the torture would be justified based on love for their country and

Open Document