ipl-logo

King Henry II And Thomas Becket: Clash Of Personality

1194 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strenght of conflict theory

‘The conflict between King Henry II and Thomas Becket was caused more by issues of principle than by a clash of personalities.’
The argument on whether the conflict between Becket and Henry was caused by an issue of principle than personality changes between 1163 and 1170. Both personality and principle comes into effect at different events but it is ultimately personality that dominates for both Thomas and Henry.
Henry chose Becket as Archbishop for his own needs this was clear as Becket was everything an Archbishop of Canterbury should not be, Henry believed Thomas would act on his orders and would place Prince Henry heir to the throne of England. 1164 was the first sign of a split between Henry and Thomas occurred. Henry passed a law which …show more content…

Thomas was ultimately doing what he was asked, his role as Archbishop required him to look after the best interests of the Church. Henry expected Becket to be manipulated by him to have an ally in the Church. Henrys personality led him to choose Becket as Archbishop due to their friendship of many years but mainly to use him to control the growing rights and powers of the Church. Henry wanted to ensure that all his vassals, ecclesiastical and lay, would owe allegiance to him, and not the Pope. However principle came into effect when Becket tried to protect the Church. After 1163 Becket and Henry where no longer friend, Henry in July 1163 proposed a sheriffs aid however Beckett stated that the sheriffs aid was not a royal rent and refused to pay it from his estates or Church lands. Animosity arose between Henry and Beckett …show more content…

However it soon turned into anger and as Thomas Becket pushed so the King began to push back and the quarrel intensified. This led to the trial of Becket which was significant because it shows a clear sign of personality dominating. Henry saw the problem of ‘criminous clerks’ as one where he could assert the King’s customary rights over the church, drawn up as the Constitutions of Clarendon. He wanted the clergy who were convicted of serious crimes to be tried in ordinary courts of law rather than ecclesiastical. Thomas publically accepted these constitutions only to renounce them later. Though Henry had strong principle it was evident in the trial of Becket in 1164 that Henry‘s personality took over. The King began to attack Becket whenever he could. At Northampton in October, Becket was summon not as an Archbishop but as a Baron accused of wrongful behaviour. Beckett was accused of contempt for the oath he had taken at Clarendon to observe the ancient customs of the realm and failure to repay royal loans which was untrue and was significant in showing Henrys personality take

Show More
Related
646 Words | 3 Pages

In this case, Henry criticized the King of England, proclaiming

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

One of the reasons Cromwell made reforms to England in the 1530s was that there was still opposition to Henry being Supreme Head of the Church. It was important to have everyone on the king’s side, because without that his ideas would be ignored. Contradicting views would be discussed and spread widely between friends and acquaintances who would spread the information even more. The largest problem was when public figures expressed their opinions. For example, Elizabeth Barton was a nun who was widely respected and believed to have apparitions of G-d.

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

Cromwell’s next revolutionary, perhaps controversial idea for the Church of England was the translation of the bible, converting it from Latin to English. As previously mentioned, Henry was reluctant in directing his new church away from Catholicism, rather shaping it around the same traditional practices. Nonetheless, Cromwell pursued the king, who was at this time with his new love, Jane Seymour and in a particularly good mood. Persuading the king was almost like a second language for Cromwell at this point and after the pull of his ear, Henry consented. John Schofield describes this as Cromwell’s “Crowning mercy” by convincing Henry.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

Historical records, notes, and manuscripts from Cranmer’s life point to King Henry VIII as the major influencer from 1529 onward. Since Scripture states God appoints leadership, Cranmer believed that the Supreme Headship expressed God’s will and it was his duty to serve the King and support him in his endeavors. On February 6, 1536, during Parliamentary sessions, Thomas Cranmer launched into a series of weekly sermons at Paul’s Cross. This would be the last Parliamentary session for the next three years, and its importance was signaled by the attendance of the Lord Chancellor Audley and the assembled clergy of Convocation.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

It’s important to understand that Henry’s position started off as fairly insecure - primarily due to his lineage being from a second marriage, and from the maternal line - which means he was very susceptible to opposition that could easily threaten his position if he did not overcome these crises. There were many Yorkists that rejected his claim, as well as men with

Read More
1430 Words | 6 Pages

In Greek mythology, Kairos, the youngest child of Zeus, is the god of opportunity and favorable moments. According to the Greeks, he is responsible for providing just the right thing, at just the right time. In Shakespeare’s King Henry V, King Henry finds himself in need of precisely this type of favor as he faces daunting odds. Specifically, what King Henry needs are just the right words and demeanor to inspire his army to fight, despite the unfavorable odds of victory and death. What can King Henry possibly say to get this band of English commoners and criminals to face certain death for the sake of his honor and glory?

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

Henry VIII and Wolsey’s foreign policy during the time period saw many adjustments of which large European power they would support, be it Charles V or Francis I. There was also a balanced approach mixing war and peaceful treaties to try and achieve long lasting peace and secure England’s place in European politics. We can see shifts in their policies depending on who they are supported by and what their main aim is to get out of the situation. On one hand, we can see Henry VIII pursued war as a means of glory by the numerous invasions he made into France, first in 1511 and later in 1513. This was one of Henry’s first moves as he King of England which would suggest that he did this to prove he was worthy of being King as Henry V had proven

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

The United States, a nation of secrecy and wealth, found access into World War I on April 6th, 1917. During the early 1900’s, Woodrow Wilson gained presidency and took initiative for all actions that America took towards war effort. His initiative was to pull the United States away from the war, but inturn it pushed them to challenge the competing nations. Uninterrupted persuasion from individuals within the nation played a significant role World War I. America’s entry into the WWI was inevitable due to President Woodrow Wilson’s victory in the campaign of 1916, which brought about a well-built alliance with Great Britain, and initiated the use of propaganda to engage the nation into war.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Thomas Becket Thomas Becket was born in the year 1120. Well educated, he was the son of a merchant ("Thomas Becket(c. 1120 - 1170)"). He went to school in Paris and went from there to England. While he was in England, he was in the house of Theobold, the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

Henry the VIII was important to history because he established the church of England and began the protestant reformation in England. When Henry became the king England the head of the church was the pope everything was written in Latin and almost everything was based on the Roman Catholic church. By the time Henry had died the king was the head of the church. Most of the prayers were said in Latin but The “Lord’s Prayer” was spoken in English.

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

Pope Innocent would understand this and moreover would come to realise that he had potentially created the problem through his handling of a key appointment to the cathedra of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Pope Innocent chose a man whose quest for power and influence would take the English monarchy to the brink of disintegration and which would have seen all of Europe collapse like a house of cards as those governed in each country realised that the authority to rule and be ruled was voluntary and no longer secured by might but rather by those who were ruled accepting

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Henry's actions were based solely on personal reasons. At the beginning, Henry broke away from Rome because of his assertions of royal supremacy. The England church was a ‘monarchical’. Before he became king , he had a prayer scroll containing illuminations of the Trinity, the crucified Christ, and several martyred saints. The prayers contained martyred saints, St George slaying the dragon, and Christ’s passion.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.

Read More
1503 Words | 7 Pages

This primary source, is a historical text, a transcription of a speech by Elizabeth I, Queen of England. In fact, there are at least two main versions of this important speech. To understand the importance of the speech we must remember that at that time England and Spain had intermittent conflicts. At this period Spain, was ruled by Philip II and England was ruled by Elizabeth I.

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

Patrick Henry’s use of rhetorical questions aided his persuasive speech to the Virginia Convention. First of all, he used a rhetorical question when he said, “Shall we try argument,” (Henry 101). This quote proves that the common people shouldn’t attempt to create a dispute between themselves & Britain. He said this because he didn’t want things to get more worse than they already were.

Read More

More about King Henry II And Thomas Becket: Clash Of Personality

Related Topics

Open Document