ipl-logo

King Lear Seminar Response

472 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Edmund king lear analysis

King Lear Seminar Response
1. During the seminar on William Shakespeare’s play King Lear a statement I agreed with was when Victoria spoke. Victoria argued that point four “Given what Edmund was born into, his actions are understandable.” Victoria explained Edmund, Edgar and Gloucester situation and the constant mistreat Edmund received from Gloucester and said that no matter what a person does to you, feel whatever you want, but it is wrong to act upon the negative feelings. For example, Edmund plotted against Edgar and Gloucester and spun a lie that Edgar wanted to kill Gloucester and sent Edgar away to fuel his plan. I agreed with Victoria because I feel that no matter what a person does whether it be harming a family member or stealing you never should act with violence or hatred as it will not solve the issue. This is why I agreed with Victoria.

1. During the King Lear seminar a statement I disagreed with was when McKenzie argued that Ran was a poor adaptation and that it didn’t capture King Lear’s spirit. McKenzie explained that The Fool’s over dramatic nature, the fact that the children were boys, the exclusion …show more content…

During the seminar a statement made by Nick Baldwin made me rethink my stance on point four regarding whether Edmund’s actions were reasonable or not. Nick has four siblings including Hailey in our class and he explained that with his experience if he and his father called Hailey a bastard everyday saying that because she didn’t have the same mom she was less than the rest of the children. When I first looked at the statement I examined it and right away followed my own biases and said disagree because it is wrong no matter what to act with violence. Nick made me reexamine my thoughts and realize that I do not have experience of a blended family and cannot assume what it would feel like to be called a bastard every day. I still stand by my point that it is wrong to act the way Edmund did but I can somewhat understand where Edmund was coming

Show More
Related
68 Words | 1 Pages

Hi Courtney, It was tragic how the leaders of American Indian were treated. Sitting Bull an American Native try to comply with the government; however, even thought it was his land government official opposed his beliefs. Sitting Bull tradition was taken away from them. When Sitting Bull tried to regain his dignity by practicing a religious ritual called the Ghost Dance the government once again intervene. (Anderson,

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Elizabeth Kirchner Guppies January 4, 2018 I believe that there is many reasons for Hamlet 's actions to be justified and not justified. But it depends on what you believe from the information you were given from the packet. I personally believe that he is both justified and not justified from just reading the book. But the packet helps you understand more than the book did.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Expectations are put in place for people in society, and if people do not follow these expectations they may think differently than an average person would. If someone is brought up in life with different outlooks than you then maybe their decision making skills may be different from yours and some might not have the same feelings as you do on a certain act or deed. When someone has convinced themselves that the decisions they are making are the right ones then any act of anything is acceptable in their mind. In the script Tragedy of Macbeth, the character of Lady Macbeth, does not fit society’s expectations of her role as a woman, feeling of guilt, and desire for the title of the queen.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout William Shakespeare’s tragic play, King Lear, the goal of gaining control over the kingdom and boasting about one’s status drove the characters to deceive each other through the use of lies and manipulation. Right from the start, King Lear demanded that his daughter profess their love for him, causing Regan and Goneril to exaggerate their love all to flatter their father and gain the most of his land. When it was Cordelia’s turn, even though she spoke from her heart about how much her father means to her, her words did not praise her father enough as he insisted she revise her confession. Act 1 Scene 1 started the destruction of the Lear family as Regan and Goneril proved successful in gaining their father’s land by spreading lies

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

Like many things, Hamlet is intelligent and honorable, but his indecisiveness is the cause of his tragic downfall. In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare portrays that Hamlet is very incapable of finishing the task at hand. Throughout the drama Hamlet faces many trials and tribulations due to his late father Hamlet, who was murderously killed by Claudius. His inability to kill Claudius and himself is one grand flaw of an epic hero. After King Hamlets passing, Hamlet entered an unknown state of mind that not only feared others for his wellbeing, but also feared himself.

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

His desire for power and status is very clear that there is no mistaking it for something else. Most of the other characters also have reserves of what they will and will not do, at least for the beginning of the play, but Edmund simply does not care. Father, brother, and even lovers, he will not let anyone stand in the way of what he wants most. The treachery of Edmund’s villainous ways is significant to the meaning of King Lear because of how far he is willingly to go to get what he wants and betray his family. Betrayal and madness are two of the major themes of King Lear and Edmund is the epitome of both.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Significantly he tells inconvenient truths to the King with the unbridled insolence of a conscience. The King’s descent into madness comes when, importantly, he banishes his Fool ' '.(2016:278).In fact, King Lear is a masterpiece of psychological insight into human nature. In this tragedy scene, the picture which Shakespeare has painted of King Lear becomes completely reversed here. Indeed, Many characters have flaws affecting their decisions in English literature, they made mistakes only to realize them later.

Read More
249 Words | 1 Pages

The audience sympathise with King Lear’s redemption. Throughout the play, he gets a chance at redemption to make up for his mistake of having “thy truth being the dower:” for his daughter. He realises the folly of his actions and redeems himself stating “I am a very foolish fond old man”. This demonstrates King Lear's change in character as he learns that he is not as powerful as thinks he was and starts to become more humble. There is a lure of sympathy for King Lear because a story of redemption inspires people and catches their imagination, that anything is possible.

Read More
1961 Words | 8 Pages

As King Lear creeps to an end of his reign, he decides to divide his kingdom into three parts dependent on which one of his daughters has devoted the most love to him. When the kids betray their fathers for control of money and power Lear and Gloucester soon realize that they were distracted by their careless emotions. Readers are introduced to King Lear in the prime of his arrogance. He is a typical king who thinks that the world revolves around him. As Lear begins to realize that he is becoming too old

Read More
1388 Words | 6 Pages

ACT I Early on in the Shakespearean play, King Lear makes the decision to refuse giving Cordelia a portion of the kingdom and disowns her as she does not falsely amplify her love to her father the way her sisters had. The decision is rash and even Lear’s servant Kent tries to tell Lear that he is not thinking on this decision clearly. Lear stubbornly keeps his word even though he admitted that Cordelia was his favorite and that he planned to spend his old age with her. The question as to why Lear did not swallow his pride despite his regret and hands the kingdom over to Cordelia’s two sisters and their husbands.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

In this essay I want to show that in the first act of King Lear it was already hinted at some points of the development that the characters of King Lear and the Earl of Gloucester go through. The character Lear shows signs that he is becoming mad while it begins to affect his life and those of the other characters in the play . In the beginning of the Play King Lear decides to divide his Kingdom into three parts and split it among his three daughters with the goal to prevent future conflicts and to rid him of the burden of ruling. However he decides that the Kingdom should be split according to how much his daughters love him and not by who is the best ruler “Which of you shall we say doth love us most, / that we our largest bounty may extend

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

It is often said that the opening scene or chapter of a drama sets the stage for the major themes that the reader will see throughout the book or play. This theory is proven to be true in William Shakespeare’s King Lear. The first scene in act one helped to introduce some of the themes that would be seen throughout the rest of the play like the idea of madness, reconciliation and the idea of authority versus chaos. One major theme was reconciliation. In the very beginning when Lear was asking his daughter how much they all loved him, Cordelia couldn’t come up with the right words to say that would express her feeling for her father and accused her sister of exaggerating their love for him.

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

Beneath his high class physicality, Lear struggles to maintain his confidence within himself because he depends on the constant admiration from others to feel content with who he is. One who leads with counterfeit beliefs and unstable values is bound for failure. Shakespeare designed this playwright to display the tragedy of a King who slowly goes mad, however in order to reach sanity sometimes one must go completely out of their mind to gain the wisdom in telling the difference. (David Bevington 1988)

Read More
2475 Words | 10 Pages

Shakespeare’s Hamlet takes the audience on a journey of a prince who is caught between two spheres of a society in which he attempts to discard the expected norms of a prince to converge to his new ideas on the type of man he wants to live as. The Renaissance was a period in the 16th century that challenged ideals that were limited and outdated. Hamlet is a humanist figure who lives according to the humanist ideals and this leads him to questioning the society and his role as a prince in the 16th century. During the play we see how Hamlet is in constant conflict with the morality of exacting revenge and his new learning and education. It is against this backdrop that I will discuss the argument of Arnold Kettle’s “From Hamlet to Lear” in relation the extracts I have analysed.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

In the interesting quote, "I am a man more sinned against than sinning" (Hamlet, act 3:2.58-59), Lear states the unjust treatment he received from his daughters, while acknowledging that he has not been a saint himself. Through this quote shows his belief that although he has mistreated people and not acted right, his behaviour has yet not been worse than how others have treated him. Lear’s character is highly flawed and has undoubtedly acted unjust while having a shallow view on relationships and how they should be. Lear can be viewed as a stubborn old man whose mind cannot be changed easily.

Read More

More about King Lear Seminar Response

Related Topics

Open Document