ipl-logo

Kwame Anthony Appiah's Argument Analysis

627 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cosmopolitanism appiah essay

Kwame Anthony Appiah Argument The answer to the globalization pandemic is cosmopolitanism. Globalization is described as being negative according to Kwame Anthony Appiah it’s a one-way thinking or a one-way frame of mind. We are responsible for ourselves and things should be done on our individual terms. An example he gives is “I want you to be my brother on my terms.” (Taylor, 2009, p. 92) Which is correct with culture today considering we are only friends when it is convenient to us to be friends. We all have a “fundamental responsibility to everybody that must be met whenever we can but there is lacking cultural relativism.” (Taylor, 2009, p. 92-95) Cosmopolitanism, where “we’re responsible collectively for each other as citizens.” (Taylor, …show more content…

Which is the point of an argument to persuade the reader to think about their stand point on the argument and whether or not their views need to change. A great example in this argument is his closing statement, “We have to figure out how to live in a word in which our responsibilities are, not to just a hundred people… whom we can affect only in indirect ways. That is, I think, the great challenge.” (Taylor, 2009, p. 113) Opposition in an Academic Argument The purpose of addressing the opposition in the argument for Kwame Anthony Appiah was to provoke the reader’s emotions, morals, and values. That’s the whole point of this argument to have the readers see more on the cosmopolitanism side versus the globalization side. The speaker Kwame Anthony Appiah I feel handled the opposing views by demonstrating his critical thinking skills. By setting the argument up as a question and answer Appiah gave room for he himself to touch on the opposing argument but would be able to use his critical thinking skills and turn the answer around in favor of his argument. Which also gave opportunity for new ideas that potentially were not originally to be discussed in his argument. Because when you are using critical thinking you can then change your answer to suit whatever situation you are

Show More
Related
64 Words | 1 Pages

For more than a month ,Grant and lee had been fighting almost daily. Grant had 1000000 men in his army to pound the confederate army to the ground but Lee 's men would not budge Both armies suffered extraordinary casitas . Grant had lost 60000 men and lee lost about half that.but Grant could afford casualties because he had more men than Lee’s army

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

“Virtuous Arguments” Reading Response Through John Duffy’s written works, he stated that Rush Limbaugh’s sexist comments were insults towards the Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke. John Duffy describes in a well-written manner how critical it is to have knowledge in having an opinion towards a certain topic and commenting about it in a structured format. John Duffy states that rhetoric has taken a turn into a negative path to where people do not care about what they say anymore to the public. John Duffy suggested that Rush Limbaugh was being sexist towards Sandra Fluke on public radio. We should be respectful of other people’s beliefs and or values, because if we have dissimilar opinions we need to be cautious in verbalizing those thoughts so that we do not offend others.

Read More
93 Words | 1 Pages

James Otis had written a document “the rights of the British colonies” after parliament had passed the sugar act in 1761.Otis argued that it is the people that give power to the government. Otis also argued that if a government is found “incorrigible” , the “government should be disposed by the people.” Otis also argued that parliament deprives the colonists of their most essential rights as free man because of all the taxes parliament was enacting. But Otis did believe that “parliament has the authority to make laws for the general good of the colonies.”

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Summer Reading Assignment Jay Heinrichs in the novel Thank You For Arguing, asserts the reader that every argument has three basic steps: simulating the audience’s emotions, changing the audience’s opinion, and getting the audience to do or choose something. Heinrichs supports his assertion by defining the three types of argument... The Greek Philosopher Aristotle determined the three kinds of argument as forensic argument (which deals with balme and takes place mostly in past tense), demonstrative argument (which deals with values and morals and usually takes place in the present tense), and finally deliberative argument (which deals with choices and decision making and usually takes place in the future tense). The

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

In Kwame Anthony Appiah’s essay, the Case for Contamination, Appiah delivers his opinion on society’s growing culture and the effects that have occurred due to society’s growing influence, such influences include the globalization, both political and lifestyle, and cultural preservation aspects of society. Within his standpoint, Appiah offers many valid points on the positive aspects of the development of globalizations and its key role in society. However, despite Appiah’s lengthy essay, his argument lacks sources that support his claims, ultimately causing his views on the subject to stem from personal experiences. Due to this, the essay insufficiently discusses the depth of how damaging globalization is to a cultural, which essentially encourages

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

The way Krakauer organizes Into the Wild helps support his argument towards Christopher McCandless and to the responses received by the article Krakauer had written earlier on McCandless and about his trip. Krakauer gives the readers background information for most of the book, along with excerpts from McCandless’s journal he seldom kept. McCandless’s journal entries include statements such as, “MOOSE!” on June 6th when he shot a moose instead of squirrels, and different types of birds which he had been eating since he got to the bus (Krakauer 166). McCandless’s last writing reads, “ I have had a happy life and thank the Lord.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

Tommy Varhall Miss putman Hour 4 15 november 2016 Argument essay Ethics is the knowledge of something wright or wrong. Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man who lives in New york and has an IQ of 68 and has been going to class for adults to help him read. He works at a job and gets made fun of and then an opportunity pops up for him to get smart and he accepts and becomes. The doctors only did it so they could get credit and the fame.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Arguments happen everyday in history and now a days. Weather the arguments come from speeches, debates, body language, or even a paper; they contribute to everyday life. These arguments can happen by audio or visual rhetorics which help to strengthen the argument and its purpose. Both Daniel H. Cohen and FDR use great rhetorics in their speeches, ethos and pathos, while keeping in mind the audiences they are speaking to. These two men both had a purpose in their speeches, weather it to argue the importance and ways of argument winning, or the future of the country.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Eisenhower cites four main pieces of evidence. He first cites the unfortunately high number of fatalities and injuries on the current highways. Eisenhower argues that the more than thirty six thousand wounded and more than one million injured highway users put a high financial burden not only on the individual family who faces tragedy, but also on the nation. In Eisenhower 's report, he states, “But reliable estimates place the measurable economic cost of the highway accident toll to the Nation at more than $4.3 billion a year.” With this information, Eisenhower shows that with an updated highway system, accidents, and thus costs, could be cut considerably.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the middle of the 1800s, the unity of the United States was threatened by the possibility of traveling closer to dividing into two separate countries. Disputes between the North and South grew as they disagreed on the allowance of slavery in the United States. The North strongly believed that slavery was immoral and should be abolished, whereas, the economy of the South greatly depended on the work of slaves in the cotton industry. After many years of compromises dealing with popular sovereignty among the states, a few key events led to the inevitable disunion of the United States. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the decision in the Dred Scott case led to disunion because they resulted in disagreements between the North

Read More
291 Words | 2 Pages

During Dred Scott vs. Sanford (1856), Chief Justice Taney stated that “The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms” and “The question before us is, whether the [people of African ancestry] compose a portion of this people.” He answered his own question with “We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word “citizens” in the Constitution.” In 1787, the Constitution was written. “We the People” at the time were elite white males. It didn’t include colored, Natives, women, or impoverished people.

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

The main argument of the essay is how to effectively read an essay. The author wants the reader to try out a different way of reading. He points out that we need to fully understand rhetoric to be able to analyze an essay properly. He states that learning the art of persuasion can be difficult, but it will help break down an essay into parts. He also advices taking notes while reading to fully grasp what the author is trying to say.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Globalization is a massive thing that affects every person on the planet in one way or another. This source raises the argument that globalization is a disease that harms people in more ways then it helps and needs to be stopped before it wipes out the human race. This raises a good point is some ways because globalization does harm humans in many way such as losing jobs due to outsourcing and the people who get the outsourced jobs are put into horrible working conditions and underpaid without benefits. But it also helps in some ways with trade and communication strengthening the relations of countries. I do agree with the source that globalization harms many people but not quite to the extent that the author goes to, I think that

Read More
2235 Words | 9 Pages

GLOBALIZATION, TECHNOLOGY AND LAW Globalization and Technology Globalization has completely transformed the way in which the world and its people interact. Earlier there were several roadblocks in the ability to communicate and interact with the people worldwide. But now, the world is becoming more and more globalized in all spheres: Business, financial, social, economical, etc. Over the years, a lot of technological advancements have come into picture including the changes in the field of Information Technology, having a significant impact on the global landscape.

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

Globalization and Cosmopolitanism for a long time have been used interchangeably to create a sense of boundarylessness. The two words, however, are not synonymous. Globalization has a single dimension, economic globalization. Cosmopolitanism, on the other hand, is multidimensional and addresses various aspects of the social world. The multifaceted nature of cosmopolitanism has changed the history of the social worlds (Nussbaum 2008).

Read More

More about Kwame Anthony Appiah's Argument Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document