More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast how leader-member exchange theory from differs other theorys
Comparing and contrasting transformational leadership theory to leader-member exchange theory)
Compare and contrast how leader-member exchange theory from differs other theorys
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In my brief I will explore the effect of the Loving V. Virginia (1967) on the case of Obergefell V. Hodges (2015) and how it led to legalization of same sex marriage. I will prove that the 9th amendment which addresses the right to marriage did not specify that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I will also prove that the precedents set by prior cases reflected on the decision of the supreme justice. I will first explain the prior cases and discuss their rulings and reflect on the reason judges chose this. I will then discuss the Obergefell v. Hodges case and its similarity to prior cases .
1 Introduction When you hear about the words ‘servant’ and ‘leader’, what would you think about? Many people will come up with the fact those are contrary words. If you draw a hierarchical pyramid in your mind, the servant is placed in the bottom class and the leader is located in the top part on the contrary. However, there is one leadership theory called servant leadership.
On the positive side, creating a high-quality LMX relationship with employees can create an environment with a high level of trust and respect. However, this theory seems to put leaders into a position where they will treat employees differently based on the ability to create either a high or low quality relationship. The truth is not everyone will like each other on a personal level. My personal opinion is that the employee is not being paid to like me, they are being paid to do a specific set of duties and maintain a level of responsibility and accountability for their work. Treating employees differently based the level of relationship I have been able to forge (which is not always in my control) can cause a rift between team members and is a breeding ground for nepotism, since the employees that I have created a high-quality relationship may be viewed by others as receiving special treatment and impacts decisions such as performance reviews, opportunities for advancement, and how incentives may be distributed.
The circumstance where a strong leader would follow a weak leader is when a stronger leader may want to be nice and do it out of respect for the person’s office or past achievements. Another case is that the stronger leader is commanded to follow the weaker leader. However, the usual case is that the weaker leaders usually follow the more stronger ones. Briefly describe the three phases that most groups go through when they first come together.
Chapter one of the readings provides the background knowledge of leadership. Consequently, an understanding of leadership leads to defining branches of leadership. As chapter two provides insights of the leader, chapter three provides insights of the follower and chapter four which completes the branches of leadership provides knowledge as it relates to the goal. Finally, chapter five will bring together the leader, follower and the goal to link them in the leadership process while chapter seven outlines how the role of the follower is evolving globally within the leadership process.
Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.
HOW LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOUR MAY INFLUENCE GROUP DYNAMICS IN ORGANISATIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this essay is to explain how leadership behaviour may influence group dynamics in organisations. Leadership behaviour is the behaviour; a leader exhibits (Malik, Aziz and Hassan, 2014) and according to (Malik, Aziz and Hassan, 2014) (House et al, 2002) leadership means an ability to influence, motivate and enable others in a way that they contribute towards the efficiency and accomplishment of the mission and goals of organisations which have employed them. On the other hand, this essay involves the study and analysis of how people interact and communicate to each other in small groups.
What does it mean to take a distributed perspective? Distributed leadership is one form of leadership. It highlights leadership as an emergent property of a group networking of interacting individuals. The concept of distributed leadership has swept through the theory and practice of educational leadership. It has become the theory of choice for many (Lumby, 2013).
According to Jong and Hartog (2007) described leadership as a process to influence
Topic Part 1: Is shared and distributed leadership the only way forward for leadership within the current health and care context? Part 1 Introduction- Statement about Leadership Yukl(2010) defined Leadership as the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how to do it, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish shared objectives. Winston and Patterson (2006) stated leadership aimed to identify the diversity of their followers in order to achieve goals and can provide some support, training and education to the followers to help them to improve their abilities within the organization’s goals and resources to ensure the goals can be reached.
I completely agree with you Linda the more information you gather on the client the better it is to handle their case. From a sociological stand point family dynamics, socioeconomic structure play a very important role in in how the client will act. Peter Blau ( a sociology theorist ) discussed power and rewards through social exchange. The process of exchange can be and should be an equal one, with equal rewards; however, if there is an imbalance in power discrepancies are created. If this happens then a client may lose trust, Hence the importance of communicating everything.
The leader will use different powers kept the follows on topic and engage to the goal. The leader/follower situation framework contains the elements: leader, follower, and situation. The framework lays out a way for leaders to learn their role because the leader need to gain power and hold
Specific mention may be made of three such theories; Fielder’s contingency theory, situational leadership and Path- Goal theory. The Fielder contingency theory suggests that there must be a strong leader- member relationship. A leader
For example in leaders and followers relationship, when leader give any inspiration toward followers and then followers change something, it is consider as influences. Third, organizational objectives are based on leaders and followers outcome from what they willing to accomplish in the future. Being a member of organization need to work together in order to produce outcomes that both leaders both followers
The theory is also popularly used because gives the leader the capacity to develop a high self-esteem and self-confidence. When a leader has developed these skills, the leader is therefore capable of influencing others while trying to handle different situations in different times. In addition, self-confidence gives
