More handpicked essays just for you.
Stem Cells moral dilemma
Ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research
Ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stem Cells moral dilemma
Smith was brilliant at persuading his reader from the very first three sentences of the article with appeal to emotion Smith added strong humanization to his topic of embryonic stem cells from the very beginning . He told us of a 2yr old girl named Hannah Stege(Hannah), who once was a frozen embryo in a vito fertilization clinic. Smith then followed the introduction of Hannah with "She was what those who support embryonic stem--cell research--research that destroys such human embryos--callously call spare and leftover"(Smith 24). He has now put a name and child to the embryo to paint the picture of her life meaning nothing to the researchers, which is something no one would agree with about a child's life. Smith then adds "She could have been fodder for researches, but instead today she is talking blue steak"(Smith 24).
Search for literature or research that will help you answer this question. Summarize and cite it here. Explain Lo, Bernard, and Lindsay Parham. " Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research."
The deliberation of bioethics in human cell and stem cell research has flip-flopped altercations between whether stem cell research corrupts the future or if basic ethical uses in clinical research are being held to its standards. The idea of having genetically altered drugs and cells sits with people the wrong way, and with that they have come to the decision that cell research will cause more problems than it stopping them. However, while a majority of people and scientists believe genetic engineering is an evil corruption of nature’s course, genetic engineering has the greatest potential to do something great for our future, but it is our moralistic responsibility to follow the rules of bioethics. The author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta
The essay “Best Hope Lies in Privately Funded Stem Cell Research”, states the importance of stem cell research and the effects it can have on curing disease more effectively than any other method. Written by Sigrid Fry-Revere, PhD, director of bioethics studies at the Cato Institute; the author of the paper emphasizes the importance of funding programs for stem cell research on highlights the government holding out on funding due to ethical reasons. Revere claims that the government is threatening the private investing of stem cell research organizations and are trying to put a stop to production of research. This essay is targeted for people who are academic/bioethics orientated and the future of the world disease control and abolishment.
However, some may disagree, “Dr. Hagiwara felt his family had an economic interest in the new cell line since he had proposed the project and his mother had provided the original cells” (Andrews). Stating that people’s body parts are apart of their personal property and need to be treated as so. That without the persons who donated the body parts there wouldn’t be any tissues or cells to help aid in research anyways. On the other hand, “Dr. Royston disagreed with Dr. Hagiwara, since he and his colleges had invented the procedure and created the parent cell line that made the production of human monoclonal antibodies possible” (Andrews). In the end, there will always be new and incurable diseases like that of my grandfather’s Parkinson’s.
Ian Kerridge and Ronald Fung in "Uncertain Translation, Uncertain Benefit And Uncertain Risk: Ethical Challenges Facing First-In-Human Trials Of Induced Pluripotent Stem (Ips) Cells" talk about the discovery of “induced pluripotent stem (iPS)” in 2006 and its application in cell replacement therapy, and how it changed the debate on the ethics stem cell. In the article Ian and Ronald explain how iPS is different from the regular stem cell, and how it changes the debate of ethics in this matter. The problems with the ethics and stem cells are the experiments, and use of embryos, and ova taken from women and do research with it. Although the iPS is one alternative to the stem cell research, are different from the normal human stem cells. In conclusion
Over the years, there have been many controversial issues surrounding medical research, but one of the most arguable topics of all time is the use of embryonic stem cells. Some individuals believe that extracting stem cells from unborn babies will be useful to create new medications or, in most cases, help regenerate damaged cells. Although, many people disagree with the process scientists use to obtain these stem cells. By continuing embryonic stem cell research, scientists are denying an unborn child the chance to live, they are not letting nature take its intended course, and they are not adhering to the religious or moral beliefs of many people.
One major difference between the Middle Ages and The Renaissance was the attitude towered ancient classical works by the Greeks and the Romans. The Middle ages saw a suppression of classical works and thinking, regarding it as dangerous to the moral and spiritual health of the society. While the Renaissance witnessed a resurgence in the popularity and critical analysis of the ideas put down by Greek and Roman writers and thinkers. The second difference is in the organizational structures of political power and kingdoms.
“ESC research relies on the destruction of an embryo, a potential form of human life so that the pluripotent stem cells can be harnessed for conducting research and experiments. ”(Manzar, 2) Despite biomedical researchers claims that ESC research will eventually benefit society, the idea that it has not achieved that yet, while embryos have been destroyed in numerous amounts, leads to a conclusion which opposes their initial ideology. The fact that the embryos could have become humans, who may have one day won a novel peace prize, or invented the most innovative machine of their era, or if not that, they could have just been happy people with families and love, shows that ESC research is immoral and contradictory to its task. Nevertheless, ESC research carries forward, interestingly enough, without any true benefit to speak
An Ethical Approach to Stem Cell Research Imagine for a moment being diagnosed with early onset Parkinson’s disease. Feelings of uncertainty, fear, and concern for the future fill your mind. Once you have been able to absorb the news, you begin to research the condition, wanting to become knowledgeable and prepared for what you are now forced to face. Topics that you are focusing on are; the progression of this disease, treatment plans, and the possibility of a cure. During your research you read an abundance of information regarding stem cell therapy.
Nevertheless, no one should withstand between the health benefits of others when they are suffering from either a minor or severe illnesses. Stem cells can repair or form new tissues, muscles and much more. Governments should allow stem cell research in more countries around the world as the proof is there that stem cells can fix, maintain, or form into new cells of the body, depending on where it was placed in the body. What's stopping the development of stem cell research?. The thought of stem cell research to some is the murder of unborn cells or eggs that could bring future children, however, the cells are from the eggs are unconscious and are in sense “dead” already, the eggs are wasted from periods every day from women around the world.
It is because of my varying beliefs on this issue that I researched the question: Do the medical advantages of stem cell research exceed the moral
The Positive Side of Stem Cell Research Embryonic stem cell research is a sensitive and controversial topic in our society, and rightly so: the extraction of stem cells from the unborn results in the death of the developing child. Embryonic stem cells are used in research because they are totipotent: that is, they can develop into any other cell or tissue type in the body. Theoretically, this property makes these cells well - suited for medical applications ranging from creating new organs to researching diseases. Certain other human tissues also create stem cells, but because these cells arise later in development, they are more restricted in the types of cells into which they can differentiate.
However, these new discoveries raise many ethical questions. Do we consider an embryo a “person”? With that question in mind, is it right to use stem cells (involves destroying potential human life) for research to help people with diabetes, heart conditions, or other various diseases? By the end of this paper, one will be able to form an opinion on this question, by weighing the importance of stem cell research to save human lives and the protection of the embryo and the “sanctity” of life. Deriving embryonic stem cells has opened a
In today’s time about nearly as 70% of the American population are pro, for having the use of stem cell researched, compared to the 27% who believe it’s morally wrong. A high rise compared to a past poll conducted in 2004 with it being at about 60% who say it’s morally right. When people are asked of or brought to attention by stem cells, some my automatically think of “stem cell research”, and second to that they might as well be thinking “controversy”. Over the past few years the topic of stem cells has really been brought to world as a new study, but has come so far since the first day it was discovered. Stem cells not only has been categorized as a potentially revolutionary treatment, but as well as a sensitive, unethical issue for certain groups of people.
