ipl-logo

Literacy Debate: Online, R You Really Reading

1009 Words5 Pages

Technology sometimes has a negative effect on people because some believe that it interferes with school or better yet, reading. Reading is a big characteristic in the world that can bring people together and open the imagination. All schools require students to read and write papers on the books they have read. Will that no longer be a requirement now that technology and websites continues to grow? If novels go away, would the world still be okay? In addition, will test scores in reading comprehension drop? There are many possibilities, but none of them has happened yet. Motoko Rich in her article, “Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading?” confronts the topic of “online reading” over book reading, and a fifteen-year-old girl. Teenagers have found a new type of reading called fan fiction. Personally, I don’t read fan fiction for fun on the internet. I do read news articles, or entertainment news on websites. However, Nadia, a fifteen-year-old girl, spends her free time on the internet on fanfiction.net (Rich 25). It doesn’t surprise me …show more content…

Fan fiction involves spelling errors and writing errors (Rich 28). Reading is supposed to be a way to help students with reading comprehension and writing. With that being said, some statistics show that reading novels for fun show greater reading test scores than those who don’t. It is also very important for someone to know how to read properly when looking for a job because it’s important to the employer (Rich 29). I have a personal example for the application of Buffalo Wild Wings. There is an English test and a math test along with the application. I’ve seen many people judge others who don’t know how to pronounce a word properly or can’t read quickly. Therefore, I do agree with the fact that people who “score higher on reading tests tend to earn higher income,” (Rich

Open Document