Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
William shakespeare analysis
William shakespeare analysis
College shakespeare analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
William shakespeare analysis
William shakespeare analysis
College shakespeare analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Macbeth’s decision is heavily influenced by Lady Macbeth’s attack on his manhood. She discusses the power that Macbeth will possess if he is brave enough to do anything. “I am settled, and bend up/ Each corporal agent to this terrible feat.” (Shakespeare 1.7.79-80) Macbeth makes an impulsive choice that is very unlike his true character. He is at the point where he would do anything that will make him the King of Scotland, such as killing Duncan.
The last thing that the witches predict is that macduff will kill macbeth, which happens. So the real question is did Macbeth have free will or was it fate that ended him? It is very easy to predict the fact that Macbeth was controlled by fait. Macbeth was easily controlled by fait. At the beginning of the story he had no idea he would ever be king.
This story has both fate and free will. This is more than clear because as mentioned; the prophecy of the witches telling Macbeth he will become the king of Scotland but they didn’t tell him how was he going to become king. He just interpreted the prophecy, as he wanted. Fate has a very important role in the story.
The prophecy of the witches in the beginning of the play demonstrates the philosophical idea of determinism proving that Macbeth could not ignore what the witches prophesied for him. The influence of Lady Macbeth’s manipulation proves that Macbeth’s psychology gave him the illusion of free will. Macbeth is again given the illusion of choice when he kills the king; however, his so-called choices are easily disproved by determinist beliefs. Finally, as Macbeth faces death he realizes his fate is determined by a higher power just as fatalism suggests. Philosophical ideas that can be understood through the play, show that Macbeth did not act of his own free will.
The knowledge of fate is virtually as powerful as fate itself. An unabashed bold manner is developed with the fortitude that it is the will of the world that leads to the outcomes that will be procured. Macbeth gains an attitude of invincibility that only enlarges as the play reaches its ending, but it can be inferred that such arrogance would not have been so potent had he not been certain that the actions he took were in fact the correct actions. It is challenging to discern if the plot would have remained the same had Macbeth been oblivious to what he was preordained to accomplish; if the prophecy would continue to be a prophecy if it had gone unannounced, or if the declaring of the prophecy is what led to its execution. The events leading to the untimely demise of Macbeth were unarguably
Do you believe that everything happens for a reason? Fate has always been a topic of discussion. While many argue that fate is predetermined and beyond human control, others believe that individuals hold the power to shape their own destinies in their daily lives. Despite what many may believe, every man is in fact the architect of their own fate as proven throughout the analyzation of the tragic character Macbeth, the words within the Serenity Prayer, and from our own real-life experiences. William Shakespeare's play, Macbeth, is a prime example of how one's choices and actions throughout one's life can shape one's future.
In the beginning of the story, one of the first things that caused Macbeth to falter with his free will was manipulation. He was first manipulated by the three witches in act one, scene three. The witches tell Macbeth that he “shalt be king hereafter” (Mac.1.3.50). By saying this, the witches were able to plant that idea in his mind, manipulating his actions.
“If chance will have me king, why chance may crown me, without my stir” (Shakespeare 144). Macbeth, a loyal subject to his king has an encounter that will change his fate with an ultimate effect on his free will. They claim three predictions, Macbeth will be the Thane of Cawdor and later crowned King but Macbeths lineage will not maintain the throne. After this supernatural confrontation, Macbeth questions this loyalty which will ultimately lead to his new fate carried out (LitCharts 1). Fully capable to act upon his own free will, Macbeth instead is driven by fate to his destruction which gives further insight of his character advancement.
Macbeth made the choices by his own,he wasn’t forced or fated to make any of the choices he made. He killed King Duncan and took the scottish throne for himself. He was so power-hungry that he also wanted to kill Duncan’s son but they ran away and he was proposed as the king. He blamed two
Hail to thee, thane of Cawdor!...that shalt be king hereafter (Act 1, Scene 3).” The play Macbeth starts off with the three witches telling Macbeth and Banquo that Macbeth will become the Thane of Cawdor and then he will become king. Soon after, Macbeth learns that King Duncan has named him as the Thane of Cawdor. With this, Macbeth begins to believe that the witches’ prophecies must be true and is determined to become king. He says, “Let not light see my black and deep desires (Act 1, Scene 4),” implying that he has the inner desire to now become king.
One of the most critical ideas surrounding tragedies is fate and destiny. The idea that an individual’s life is predetermined is associated with many great works of Shakespeare, and transcending through stories, if human beings have free will. If all humans carry free will, does that mean that all humans are responsible for their crimes and inhumanities. Undoubtedly, both topics are explored through the play, but Macbeth corrupts himself with his own destructive actions. The Tragedy of Macbeth stems from the fearless, hero of Scotland who then turned into a ruthless king who will kill anyone he sees as a threat.
Macbeth had another chance to change his outcome. his wife was consumed with the idea that he would become king, so much so that she pushed him to kill the current King. She said she couldn 't do it because King Duncan looked too much like her own father. Macbeth could have easily dismissed this and not listened to his mentally dwindling wife, “Come, thick night, and pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell, that my keen knife see not the wound it makes, nor heaven peep through the blanket of the dark, to cry ‘hold, hold!’” He followed the instructions of his wife and killed the king.
Macbeth fate started of when he met the witches at the battle field after winning the battle against Macdonwald. The three witches predicted that he will become the Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth believes their prediction “ If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me Wthout my stir”
On many occasions, people can be given half truths, like Macbeth was by the apparitions in Act 4, Scene 1, but it is the individual’s job to take from it what they will as Macbeth did, and make their own destiny. Another character that fate vs. freewill affected in Macbeth, was Malcolm, the rightful heir to the Scottish throne. It was Malcolm’s fate to take over when his father Duncan died, but it was his free will that led him to flee Scotland when Duncan was murdered in Act 2, Scene
Free Will over Fate in Macbeth This theory is obvious in a scene, where Macbeth is consciously deciding to kill king Duncan. In Act 1, Scene 3 he states: - “My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical, shakes so my single state of man that function, is smother’d in surmise, and nothing is, but what is not” (Macbeth 1.3.138-141). We observe his conscious unstable thought processes about contemplating and planning the murder of Duncan emerging shortly after hearing the prophecy, and before Lady Macbeth could hear the message and influence his decision.