ipl-logo

Magistrates Court Case Study

783 Words4 Pages

magistrates court deals with nearly all criminal court cases with more than 97% also being completed there. There are three kinds of cases that are dealt with in a magistrates court, the first being summary offences which are less serious cases, where the defendant is not entitled to a trial by jury. These include cases such as minor assaults or motoring offences.
Both of these courts are for criminal purposes. All cases start in the magistrates court. There are normally three magistrates in a case these are usually people from the local community. Magistrates are sometimes called justices of the peace. Sometimes cases are tried by a single magistrate, called a district judge, who is a lawyer. A magistrates court will typically be used for …show more content…

However, where they feel the crime is out of their power, they will hold the relevant pre-trial hearings and send you to Crown Court. A Crown Court has a Judge and in here
Solicitors can not represent their client, only barristers. It is here that a Judge will decide your sentencing (if pleading guilty) or you will be subject to a trial with a jury, and these things could not happen at a magistrates court. The Crown Court deals with the following types of cases: more serious criminal offences which will be tried by judge and jury. Appeals from the magistrates court - which are dealt with by a judge and at least two magistrates. Convictions in the magistrates court that are referred to the Crown Court for sentencing. Imprisonment and fines in the Crown Court are more severe than in the magistrates court. Cases at Crown Court are tried by a jury, consisting of
12 people from the general public. A judge decides on matters of law during the trial, such as whether certain evidence is allowed to be presented, and also makes sure the trial proceeds in a fair way. The jury decides whether the offender is guilty or not guilty. If found guilty, the judge decides what penalty should be …show more content…

This can include something like a ban and fine when related to something like drink driving to a community sentence for a crime like petty theft. For more serious cases, the magistrate will need to decide whether the offender needs to be committed to Crown Court and whether bail should be set. The longest custodial sentence that a magistrates court can impose is 6 months for a single offence up to 12 months for multiple offences.
If you have committed a more serious offence you will be sent to the Crown Court for trial. These include cases of murder, rape and robbery as well as manslaughter. Cases can also include those ‘either way’ offences that the magistrates court was not equipped to handle. Any appeals from the magistrates court also head up to the next level at the Crown Court. People who have also been accused of more serious offences are often sent to the Crown Court to receive their sentence after being convicted in the magistrates court.
This is what many of us visualise when we think about a trial. The proceedings are overseen by a judge who is there to rule on any aspects of the law, guide the jury and pass judgement if

Show More
Related
1757 Words | 8 Pages

Role of the Courts Firstly, the coroner’s court investigated the deaths of the accused’s family. The case was then heard in the local court. Due to the fact that the case was an indictable offence, the local court could not finalise the verdict. Therefore, the local court conducted a committal hearing, where the magistrate was to determine whether the prosecution evidence is capable of satisfying a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused committed the offence.

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

Between 1763 – 1776, the relationship between the American colonists and the British changed drastically, as tensions rose dramatically. Economic Impact The British had depleted all financial resources to defeat the French during the French and Indian War, “she [Great Britain] was left with a debt of £137 million, over half of the budget going towards interest payments, and a garrison force in America, which cost £384,000 a year to maintain.” Footnote: Francis D. Cogliano, Revolutionary America, 1763-1815: A Political History, (London: Routledge, 2000), 27.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

This is where the defendant enters a plea (guilty, not guilty or no contest) (Schmalleger, 2015). In this case the defendant plead not guilty until his sentence was carried out and he was electrocuted. It is stated in our text book that, adjudication, or trial by jury, is where it states in the U.S Constitution in the 6th amendment where every criminal offender has the right to a trial by a jury (Schmalleger, 2015). In this case the defendant had a jury trial that lasted five weeks and they found him guilty of the murder of Charles Jr. According to our digital text book, sentencing happens once an offender had been convicted of a crime, the authority of a judge to enforce punishment on the offender happens at this time and a sentence may take many forms upon a judge’s decision (Schmalleger, 2015).

Read More
2120 Words | 9 Pages

I have chosen to compare Michigan?s judicial system with ours for this assignment. Missouri?s judicial system consists of three levels, the Circuit Court (trial court) which is the lowest level of the system, then the intermediate appellate courts which is known as the Court of Appeals and then the highest level of our judicial system, the Missouri Supreme Court, or the ?court of last resort.? Missouri?s Circuit Court contains 45 circuits with courts in each county that includes 134 circuit judges, 175 Associate Circuit Judges and 336 Municipal judges. The Circuit Courts include divisions, such as probate, juvenile, municipal, associate, family and circuit divisions.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

A judge must meet many requirements before he/ she is able to judge in court. A judge must have a law degree, a Juris Doctorate, and a numerous amount of other tests and jobs before he/she becomes a judge. Comparing the requirements of a juror and judge, a judge is more qualified to make a fair

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

The parties decide what evidence to present, what witnesses to call, and how to question them. The judge is to be a neutral during the process and uphold the principles of fairness and equality, although he does make determinations of fact and law. The adversarial system is usually found in places with a common law system. In an inquisitorial hearing, the judge has a more prominent and active role in regards to evidence and questioning the witnesses. The inquisitorial system is typically found in places with a civil law system.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

In a criminal case, first the jury is selected, followed by a preliminary hearing where it is decided if there is enough evidence for the case to be brought up in the court of law, then an arraignment occurs where the defendant pleads guilty, not guilty, or no contest. After this, the plea hearing begins where the defendant can make an agreement with the prosecutor to make a plea bargain, which is pleading guilty to a less serious crime and giving up the right to a speedy public trial to avoid risk conviction of greater penalty for a more serious crime, after which the trail starts. During the trial, opening statements are given, evidence is presented, examination and cross-examination of witnesses take place, followed by closing statements. Once the trial is finished the judge instructs the jury and they leave to deliberate. The jury returns with their verdict only if the decision is unanimous, if it isn’t the judge orders a mistrial where the trial is called off completely or a new jury is selected.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

At the lowest level of the state court system is the municipal court which reviews local ordinance violations such as traffic laws as well as some minor civil offenses. State Circuit Courts adjudicate in both civil and criminal court hearings, they often have special court for family and juvenile law cases. The State Court of Appeal decides matters of appeal from state court rulings. All US states have a Supreme Court to litigate further appeals for adherence to state laws.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

1.0 Introduction Section 80 guarantees the right to trial by jury. The Queensland Jury Act 1995 provides the current legislation which decrees that all trials on indictment must be by jury. In the ninety years since this legislation was passed, an increase of trial complexity has occurred, leaving many jurors with the inability to comprehend the information and evidence procured in a trial. This proceeds to make lay juries ineffective and unreliable. To remedy the situation, specialised juries should be introduced to minimize the amount of incorrect verdicts, misunderstandings in court, jury misconduct, and avoidance of jury duty.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

2. example 1 Firstly Ordinary people may not understand complex legal technicalities, these people may not be educated in the concept of law and maybe not even educated properly. Some people may have been educated in a completely different field and have no idea what any of the case means. This could cause the jury to loose interest and just go with what everyone else is saying because they have no idea what is going on. A lot of society have no idea about the legal requirements and what actually is right and wrong and what an offence actually is.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

Juries are selected at random from the community, ensuring that the trial is not biased towards any particular group or individual. The use of juries in the legal system provides a system of checks and balances. “Of course trial by Jury is one of our sacred cows.” (Document B) The jury acts as a counterbalance to the power of judges and prosecutors, ensuring that no one person or group has too much influence over the outcome of the case.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Sentencing Sentencing occurs after a defendant has been convicted of a crime. During the sentencing process, the court issues a punishment that involves a fine, imprisonment, capital punishment, or some other penalty. In some states, juries may be entitled to determine a sentence. However, sentencing in most states and federal courts are issued by a judge. To fully understand the sentencing phase of criminal court proceedings, it is important to examine how sentencing affects the state and federal prison systems, learn the meanings of determinate and indeterminate sentencing, and understand the impact Proposition 57 has had on sentencing in California.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

This remarkable courthouse only hosted approximately seven trials in its first year and since then has dropped even lower (Dzur, 2013). The early 20th century was the last time a jury was considered the normal process for dealing with criminal cases, and now the plea deal is king (Dzur, 2013). Simple fact is, today juries hear only a very few cases across the nation (Dzur, 2013). High-ranking members working in the justice system fear that the competence of a jury today is declining with the scientific evidence that is now available (Dzur, 2013). The statistics seem to support this fear.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

The highest position in the judiciary of Malaysia is the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Malaysia (also known as the Chief Justice of Malaysia), followed by the President of the Court of Appeal, the Chief Judge of Malaya, and the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak. Our courts structure is divided into superior courts and subordinate courts. The High Court, Court of Appeal and the Federal Court are superior courts, while the Magistrates Court, the Court for Children and the Sessions Court are subordinate courts. A

Read More

More about Magistrates Court Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document