ipl-logo

Misrepresentation In The Contract Made To Mrs. Sunderhaus?

328 Words2 Pages
This case shows fraudulent misrepresentation in the contract made to Mrs. Sunderhaus. He purchased a ring for $6,990 from Perel & Lowenstein, a sales representative guaranteed that it was worth the sales price. She also received a written guarantee from the company for the value and trade-in value. Then Mrs. S tried to trade in the diamonds ring for another, two jewellers told her the rings were not worth as much as she was told. She filed for suit for fraud against the PL company for recession of contract. Mrs. S has a good case, because she had a written statement, stating the value. Which turned out to be fraud. This case address the influence of duress in an agreement. Mr. Schmalz signed an employment contract with HS company. His contract

More about Misrepresentation In The Contract Made To Mrs. Sunderhaus?

Open Document