ipl-logo

Moral Choice Wizardry Law And Liberty Summary

525 Words3 Pages

In the article Moral Choice, Wizardry, Law, and Liberty, Andrew Morris argues that in government, the state crowds out moral choices and the governmental actions taken do not dictate whether a citizen is a good person. The Ministry of Magic does not qualify as an effective legal system and its actions are immoral. While the government should not determine how citizens act, in Harry Potter we hardly see any Ministry actors that are morally upstanding, which is incredibly alarming. There are Arthur Weasley and Kingsley Shacklebolt, but they are essentially spies for the Order of the Phoenix. J.K Rowling purposefully presented characters like Umbridge and Percy because they embody the Ministry what is wrong with it. Umbridge is so devoted to doing right by Fudge, dictating order, and personally degrading students that she somehow becomes worse than Voldemort. Percy is a redeemable character, but his quest for power at the Ministry causes a rift between him and his family because he is so enthralled with the Ministry’s agenda. Bureaucracy in Harry Potter, an institution in almost every democratic government, is …show more content…

Harry, Ron, Hermione, the Order, the Marauders, and the DA, are all rule and lawbreakers. Even at Hogwarts, doing what is necessary to protect breaks the rules. The trio gets rewarded and helps their house multiple times when they break the rules, and they are still seen as heroes. Every good character that is associated with doing the right thing and fighting for justice, goes against the Ministry in some way. That is not coincidental and it seems so natural. Natural that a government would be against the protection of its citizens because of, the people in charge, is afraid of losing power, prestige, wealth, and

Show More
Related
1491 Words | 6 Pages

The aforementioned quote leaves room for rulers, both legislative and executive, to rule justly on behalf of the public good of the community. Sherwood affirms this position saying, “It is of importance that all order of men be faithful in their several departments, for defending and promoting the public good.” Sherwood now identifies the present dangers he identifies in 1774 when he delivers his

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

the government’s job is to protect people’s lives and make sure that the citizens life is not in dangerous. When the government make a certain law they saw that it is more beneficial for the citizens, “the foundation of social order are profoundly shaken when ordinary law-abiding citizens take to skirting the law ”(Trippett). the law should be respected by the citizens, it is important because people deserve to live in a safe

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Author and First Amendment Lawyer Greg Lukianoff, in his book, Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship The End of American Debate, explores deeply into some of the most compelling college and university controversies in which freedom of speech, a right every person in the United States has, is taken away. The author mentions the way students, through debate, become less aware on what their rights are in terms of defending themselves from harsh administrative rule. Author Lukianoff explicitly states his point that what is currently happening to students in modern educational institutions is affecting and will affect them badly later down the road. The author made several arguments that completely made me agree with him.

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

When we do something to please authority, we sometimes are not sure if it is for the right reasons. Every person on the earth has authority. However, the United States military branches are excellent examples to display authority. They have rankings such as corporal and colonel who interchange and are always moving up in the rankings. Sometimes what you are ordered to do is not always morally right.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

This is referred to as “Consent of the Government” and plays a big role in determining what the government does. In reality, the people run the country and it would be smart for the government to take full recognition of this. The consent of the government states that the authority of a government should depend on the consent of the people (Document C). When the government chooses not to take this into account, there can sometimes be negative consequences. An example of this would be in 1989 in Tiananmen Square in China.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

The government’s laws suggest that they are hostile and

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

During the apex of colonial America Thomas Jefferson wrote a document that severed the ties with Britain and started the revolutionary era. The declaration was designed to free the American colonists from the British sovereignty. This independence was justified in the list of grievances committed by King George on the American people, such as not having representation and being forced to pay unreasonable taxes. To help justify this independence further the Declaration of Independence also highlighted certain and paramount ideals that were beholden to the people of the new nation. These ideals included the consent of the governed, inalienable rights, and equality, all of which were essential to the new character that developed within the United

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Knowing that you're protected and out of harm's way is something every person would love to have. If a government has this, it's citizens are more likely to be peaceful and at ease rather than frantic and fearful. Also, the people are less likely to petition and turn on the government because the government is their protector, doing them a huge favor. Lord of the Flies is a great example to why a government needs to provide an army.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Society and government require people to be obedient towards authority, but is it always the best thing to do? During the aftermath of World War II many of the major leaders of the Nazi regime were put on trial for crimes against humanity (History.com). These trials were known as the Nuremburg war trials, were most of the convicted proclaimed that they were “just following orders” (McLeod 584). Being an accomplice to a crime is also against the law. In the Nuremburg trials, those accused were not breaking the law that their government had created, they were actually following it.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

The Economic Appeal Being empathetic to one another's plight requires us to step out of our own thoughts and use our imagination. By doing so we broaden our world and trigger enormous growth in our personality and identity; evolving. This is the view English professor John Savant at Dominican University of California takes in his 2009 article “Imagining the Immigrant: Why Legality Must Give Way to Humanity” published in an issue of America magazine. Savant takes a more philosophical and ethical approach concerning immigration than Mark Krikorian; the director of the Center of Immigration Studies (CIS) does in his article that appeared in 2012’s issue of The National Interest; “The Perpetual Border Battle.”

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

Isn’t the whole point of having a government is to protect the people and serve on their interests

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

The government cannot control the minds and actions of all their citizens. Whether to take a stand or not is completely up to the individual. Although it is difficult to succeed, changes can happen in the world if one decides to fight against the obstacles. In addition to fighting

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

The quote by Lord Acton, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” is a good example of what is happening in the book Animal Farm by George Orwell. The pigs immediately gain control and leadership of the farm and eventually start to abuse the power. The pigs abuse their power by changing the commandments, living in luxury, and by treating the animals poorly. First and foremost, the pigs start changing the commandments to fit their acts and desires. In the beginning of the story, the animals decide on fair rules that everyone on the farm should abide by.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

Two Concepts of Liberty Summary of the essay: In this essay, the famous political theorist Isaiah Berlin tries to differentiate between the notions of positive liberty and negative liberty. Berlin briefly discusses the meaning of the word ‘freedom’. He says that a person is said to free when no man or body of men interferes with his activity. He makes reference to many philosophers in the essay, but there is more emphasis on the thoughts of J. S. Mill and Rousseau, the former being a firm advocate of negative liberty while the latter believes strongly in the ideals of positive liberty.

Read More
1040 Words | 5 Pages

But, imagine your government falling apart. You then realize that the people and country are affected. Some people do not know that having a good government is mainly for a person living in that country. Good governed countries keep people from doing criminal acts in their towns.

Read More

More about Moral Choice Wizardry Law And Liberty Summary

Related Topics

Open Document