Napoleons Day Analysis

729 Words3 Pages

People always want to feel secure and safe, they want to know that when they wake up the next day, they will still have all of their things. People in napoleons day had the same idea, they were willing to take it to the next level. They were willing to sacrifice any freedom they had to feel safe, including freedom of speech, they didn't care that they lost that freedom until they really needed it. The same thing happened in the U.S. following the events of September 11, 2001. People would give up anything to make sure that an attack like that would never happen again. In Napoleon's day, he promised to take back France. He did take France, but for himself. He told everyone that the only way he could take it back is to make him the leader, then when everyone in France voted, he had almost all of the votes, and he had full power of France. Not all of the things he did were bad, but most of the things he did were bad for France. Some of the bad things he did were, making himself a dictator and taking full power, betraying the french revolution, and starting wars that killed many of …show more content…

The answer to that question is different for every person, and people will always have their own reasoning for their answer, but for me, I think it is a domineering government, that means that the people inside this place are still fighting. You can't dominate something unless you actually have to dominate, so a domineering government means that the people in the place are fighting back, and they want to break free of this government. There will always be a light, a ray of hope in a dark place or time, and it will always break free and spread. It doesn't matter what happens, or how bad something is, good always wins, it might not win at first, but with time, good can't be kept away, it will always come back, and it will always be more powerful than the