ipl-logo

Net Neutrality Argument Essay

1175 Words5 Pages

With the internet being such an important part of people’s lives and businesses bottom line, it is vital to insure that the future of the internet will help us continue to innovate. The debate between net neutrality and the opposition started back in the early 2000’s with papers starting to be published about the topic in 2003 [1]. The legal battles between the government and internet service providers (ISP’s) over net neutrality started back in 2005 with the Internet Freedom Preservation Act [2]. A couple of years ago it seemed as though the term “net neutrality” was being thrown around by every major news outlet. Here we are towards the end of 2016 and although the battle appeared to have been won in 2015 when the FCC passed the Title II …show more content…

I will then talk about the fact that if net neutrality regulations were truly going to make the internet worse Google would not be for it. “What’s good for the internet is good for Google.” Neither would other huge tech companies that want the internet to be as good as possible such as Apple and Microsoft [9].
Another common argument against net neutrality is that it will ruin the profits of the ISP’s. I plan to then discuss how it was recently reported that Time Warner (Comcast) was making 97% gross profit margins from its internet service [8]. Obviously at 97% they have plenty of room for decreased profits. I will compare their profit margins to other companies to show how absurd it is.
I would also like to write a short bit about how much a company like Google and Microsoft help make the world better compared to time warner who does next to nothing. This will help nullify the counter argument to the above paragraph of “but Google, Microsoft, and Apple make a lot of money too!!!” I will then show how time warner purposely slowed down Netflix traffic to try to keep their cable

Show More
Related
763 Words | 4 Pages

In Network Neutrality Nuances, David Farber makes a contrasting counterpoint to Barbara van Schewick’s piece of net neutrality protecting us from abuse from our ISPs. Farber states that because the internet has always regulated itself over the course of its nature and is continuing to grow increasingly with no issues, we should continue to let the internet self-regulate. Thus David Farber is suggesting that the government and legislators take a reactive stance on the internet because over the course of the internet’s history it has shown to be growing exponentially. Farber continues to analyze the history of net neutrality and comes to the conclusion that any legislation that attempts to manage the internet will fail due to the incompetence of legislations regarding the internet as demonstrated by history. Farber attempts to inductively explain the pretense behind the legislations against net neutrality; however some of his examples ultimately fail to support his conclusion due to his very apparent position against legislators

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

In her well written and highly organized piece “The Nuances of Net Neutrality”, author Barbara van Schewick aims to convince readers of the need to increase net neutrality regulations in order to preserve the value of the internet. While the author presents some valid points she does not apply a thorough analysis on net neutrality, leading to the articles arguments falling apart once put under scrutiny. This is due to the use speculative language, lack of concrete examples, and failure to mention reasons why regulation is the best approach. In the article, Schewick writes in a clear and concise manner that allows the reader to easily follow the argument.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

David Farber’s Counterpoint in “Net Neutrality Nuances” by Barbara Schewick and David Farber brings up a different perspective and analysis on the issue of Net Neutrality. Instead of agreeing with the opinion of the majority and supporting the idea of the government regulating the behavior of ISPs when it comes to the internet, he argues that the government should simply leave it undisturbed and refrain from passing any laws regarding net neutrality. He believes the government progress will only slow down and hinder the actual solution, which he believes is to let the internet work itself out and resolve its own problems as it has done so in the past. While he brings up valid counterpoints to Barbara Schewick’s points that support regulation, David

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

Net neutrality has been a big topic in recent news headlines. While many people are in favor of net neutrality author Peter Gregory believes it is a form of socialism. In Peter Gregory's review, he displays his ideal future without net neutrality, and what are, in his eyes, the problems with it. Although the biased author was able to give the reader insight to their side of the argument with specific examples as to why they think their views on net neutrality would be non-beneficial, he may have botched his attempt to persuade the opposing side by using too many pathos fallacies and logos based appeals to undermine the counter argument. It is Gregory's opinion that net neutrality is a form of " techno socialism.

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

As some of us might know there has been a passionate debate on the issue of the net neutrality in which there is strong feelings on both sides of the debate. Net neutrality is the idea government should regulate the internet so that the major telecommunications companies won’t be able to turn the internet landscape into a monopoly. This paper will examine both sides of the net neutrality debate in which the content of this paper will explore both the pro and cons of net neutrality. At the end of the paper I will reveal my true thoughts about net neutrality and will discuss what I have learned about this issue in the process. Some of the pros of net neutrality include easy access to information, promotion of free speech and promoting innovation for smaller internet companies.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

He emphasizes a crucial example that supports his claim, in which the Telecommunications Act in 1996 hurt numerous companies by the loss of money. In addition the FCC also is not a formidable party that are capable of making careful decision that will not hurt Internet service providers, “The FCC has a minimum amount of technical knowledge about the Internet and thus even when it acts, often misses the mark and can end up in lengthy court actions that an innovative new company cannot survive” (Farber, 2009). He’s concerned that the decisions regarding the Internet will be legislative. Essentially, David Farber’s point is that groups such as the FCC or the Congress who are not completely involved in the changes and events that occur to the Internet should not be able to make major decisions concerning the Internet; the past proves the potential

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

The Internet is one of the most powerful tools of the modern age as a source of knowledge, entertainment and wealth generation. While a large majority of the population has no understanding of how the Internet actually works and how the content arrives at their computer they understand its importance. Currently, the biggest issue the media industry is facing is that of net neutrality. Net neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers (ISP’s) should not discriminate against information being sent over the Internet and all data packets must be treated equally regardless of source, type or content.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

Shant Sahakian, in the informative and opinionated piece, “Repeal of Net Neutrality is bad for Education, Business, and You,” written in Los Angeles Times, on November 30, 2017, argues that repealing, therefore ending net neutrality would be detrimental and “the end of the internet we have always known and loved”, and that ending net neutrality will be bad for education, business, and anyone who believes that the internet should be free and equal to use by all persons who use it today. Sahakian’s evidence consists of various references and indications to the fact that ending net neutrality will be the end to internet freedom and equality as wells as an end to the fairness and equal opportunity that net neutrality gives us today. Sahakian also

Read More
2179 Words | 9 Pages

By now, you have probably heard about the Federal Communication Commission's, also known as the FCC, ruling on the Open Internet rules, but do you know what it means for you? The ruling is important to understand because it encompasses everyone who uses the internet and details the rights those users have. The ruling covers what internet service providers, what you can do, and what the FCC can do and required 400 pages of legal document to cover every avenue that could possibly be attacked in hopes to keep what we see as the internet today as what it will look like ten years from now. This essay will cover a few of the main rulings on the FCC decision of the Open Internet rules: an explanation of some rules, how they apply to consumers by using past examples, arguments against the Open Internet rules, critical responses to those arguments, and what will be ahead for the FCC.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

This is problematic because the republican voters and democratic voters are unhappy with what is happening. Based on a recent national poll, republican voters “approve government action to ensure that internet service providers treat all web content the same” (Edwards). The voters wanted the government to make sure that everyone got fair and equal internet access and to make sure that the prices were reasonable. However, they did not want net neutrality to be repealed. Because of this, a lot of the voters were unhappy that all of the candidates of their party were so against net neutrality.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

"In December 2017, Trump FCC voted to make “net neutrality” a problem in the past. Trump has also made few remarks toward the problem. Net neutrality has been a problem since 2015. Successful networks are manipulating many advanced pieces of high quality data. Companies all over the America are facing this problem.

Read More
511 Words | 3 Pages

In 2017 leading into 2018 as well, the term “Net Neutrality” was thrown around by everyone and their mother. Yet, none of the people are actually educated on what it actually means. People are fighting the Government that the internet will not be “free” anymore, when that is not what Net Neutrality means at all. Getting rid of Net Neutrality means that the Government will have control to moderate the internet and allow services like Verizon or AT&T to speed up, slow down, or block anything they want dealing with their own company, which they should be allowed to do anyway since it is their own company. Not only is getting rid of Net Neutrality a great thing, but people have to keep in mind that net Neutrality was created in 2015!

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

Yongqi Chen 50911183 Professor Sabrina M. Cravens READING AND WRITING FOR COLLEGE SUCCESS 0232 27 April 2023 With society's rapid development and diversity, whether writers should be allowed to use their own English has already been a hot and important topic to discuss. In the article "Should Writers Use They Own English?" Vershawn Ashanti Young argues that gatekeeping in rhetoric and writing should be dismantled, and writers should be allowed to use their own English vernacular even in academia (Young). Young also says that he does not think Fish's perspective about language and writing is completely right (Young).

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

The strength of this article is that it is informative and brief. However the weakness of this article is that it’s mostly opinion based. My third article is “how is internet changing the way you think”. It’s based on different views of people about how the internet is changing the way we think. The strength of this article is that it’s very much brief.

Read More

More about Net Neutrality Argument Essay

Related Topics

Open Document