No Child Left Behind Act Argumentative Essay

Scholar or sculptor, artist or inventor, philosopher or visionary, face it, not everyone can be DaVinci. To be ripped of expression, torn from individualism, succumb to the form of rules, is the world without art. Schooling systems have twisted and reformed trying to accommodate students and their performances; however art education has been put on the back burner. While the argument that art education is already intertwined with the standard subjects, the teaching of the art in schools has proven to be beneficial to students and should be encouraged. The No Child Left Behind Act, administered under George W. Bush in 2001, promoted schools to prioritize their students attending schools. The act held back school’s excuses that were failing students. While this act promoted keeping students’ attendance in line, art education was pushed out. Subjects like the arts were considered a distraction from the primary subjects like math and English and henceforth pushed out of school systems. The problem of keeping children in schools was the primary focus of the No Child Left Behind act, the forms of individualism and expression were taken away. Parents and teachers have complained about the narrowing of public education. The creators of No

Unlike the No Child Left Behind Act under President George W. Bush, the new act focuses more than test scores and graduation rates. No Child Left Behind did promote the districts to keep their students in schools and encouraged the central academic subjects; however, arts education was pushed out of the way. With the new act, fresh requirements included additional classes that focused on art, as well as family and life engagement. Every Student Succeeds does call for a more rounded education which has shown improvement in performances in academic subjects. The act adds more quality to teach and with art increases performances in math, reading, and