Northern Vs Southern Italy Essay

There has been a divide upon Northern and Southern Italy since the country has been divided into city states. For many of years, Sicily was not a part of the country, as it was its own Kingdom, it was a separate nation compared to the rest of the Kingdoms within Italy. At one point the South was described to be an accelerated focal point, which is in the history of Italy, where as currently it is viewed to be more of an impoverished, daft area. This could be possible to their prime focus is sustaining the land amongst them, whereas the Northern areas of Italy are more based upon intellectual factors within the culture. Dating back to the 440 AD, the land of Sicily had been conquered by the Vandals, they had suffered for years with rulers

For instance, the Normans, also known as the Vikings, the emperor Justinian had taken control over Sicily and bits of Italy, where the area was then recognized as the Byzantine Empire. The rest of the area was under German rule in the Lombard Kingdom. Although at some points in Italy’s history such as, the Roman Republic and Empire, the land was under the same rule, where the land was all in cohesion rather than confined. Following the divide of two sectional empires, the land had been divided into city-states; within these boundaries of these new states, they had all been ruled by a different invading emperor. In 770 the majority of Italy was ruled by the Frankish king Charlemagne, his coverage of conquer would not stand for long, it had later been sectioned off into three main areas. In the north, the independent Kingdom of Italy had developed, but this as well would not last, as it would be conquered by Otto, the German king. He then emerged a political unit, the Holy Roman Empire. Where in the central of Italy was still much involved with the Lombards, but with Charlemagne involved he had passed the territory over to the pope, therefore the principal term the Papal State. This was too independent, but it had lasted with the