● Athens (Capital of Greece) ● Armour (gear to protect soldiers) ● Peloponnesian War (war between Athens and Sparta) Comparison SPARTA vs. Athens Sparta was a Oligarchy. They were very strong warriors and were obsessed with war. They were also a City-State.
Athens and Sparta shared many common values and views but also had their differences. They were both city-states which is a city and its surrounding villages functioning as an independent political unit. Athens and Sparta were city-States over empires because of all of the mountains in Greece that separated the land and they acted as a modern day state would. For example, one city-state would have different views and government than a city-state on the other side of a mountain. Athens and Sparta had similar values and views on how to treat people, but had differed views on education and government.
This is a program that helps students transfer from a community college to a four-year college. Students can get their associate's and bachelor's degree with 120 units. And students who complete an AA-T or AS-T can get a special GPA when applying to CSU impacted campuses or majors. If you are a high school student, still take college-track courses and talk to a counselor about your plans. If you are a community college student, talk to your counselor about which transfer major is the best.
Lysistrata The influence of the Peloponnesian War Overview The Peloponnesian War lasted nearly 30 years. Imperialistic Sparta and Athens were fighting over land and the fear of being overtaken by one another. As a result, the countries had an increase in poverty, and with most of the men away women took up nontraditional roles to make ends meet
With the withdrawal of Sparta and the Peloponnesian leagues, a congress was called on the island of Delos to institute a new alliance to continue the fight against the Persians. According to Thucydides, the official aim of the League was to "avenge the wrongs they suffered by ravaging the territory of the king." In reality, this goal was divided into three main efforts— to prepare for future invasion, to seek revenge against Persia, and to organize a means of dividing spoils of war. League members swore to have the same friends and enemies, and dropped ingots of iron into the sea to symbolize the permanence of their alliance. Over time, especially with the suppression of rebellions, Athens exercised hegemony over the rest of the league.
Athens and Sparta both felt very strongly that their city state was more superior, and there was always some tension or level of distrust between the two city states. This eventually led to the Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.E), and Athens’ navy lost toward Sparta’s army. Spartan life was mainly focused on obedience and war, while Athens focused on participating in their democracy. Spartan women were more independent and had greater power in the household, unlike Athenian women. Finally, Athens was a “democracy,” while Sparta was an oligarchy.
The wars that took place in Sparta in Greece, Rome in Italy, and North Africa are similar to each other in terms of goals and results achieved. In the Peloponnesian War, Sparta's goal was to restore the balance of Greek power and maintain Spartan supremacy at the expense of Athens and the other states of the Greek Union, while Rome's goal in the wars that took place in Italy and North Africa was to unite the regions under its control and create a strong Roman Empire. Sparta and Rome were similar in their use of military force to achieve their goals. But there were differences in how these goals were achieved.
Athens and Sparta were at war for around forty-seven years, and both city-states ended up defeated and powerless with Greece no longer being a powerful country. CONFLICT: Athens was one of the more powerful city-states and was gaining more power very quickly, Sparta was another big city-state who was surprised by the power that Athens was getting. Sparta was getting suspicious of Athens trying to overpower them and also trying to bring Corinth to
A significant conflict in history for Athens is the Peloponnesian War (431–404 BC), which exposed the democratic government system's fundamental flaws, and ultimately led to Athens' downfall and changed the political landscape of the ancient Greek world (Libretexts, 2020). In this essay, I will talk about how Athens' inability to manage the Peloponnesian War contributed to the fall of Athens' democracy. Athens could not effectively handle the Peloponnesian War. First, in my opinion, the fear of Athens' imperialism was the key factor that sparked the conflict, and in spite of its powerful navy and allies, Athens faced significant challenges including internal strife and economic hardship. For example, the Spartan's invasions of Attica and the
Athens and Sparta were the exact opposite of each other in almost every sense. Their differences in government, economy, education, and states of mind made them strong rivals and opponents but likewise, their similarities made them two of the most powerful city-states in Ancient Greece. During the Classical Period that lasted between 500 to 338 BCE, both Sparta and Athens competed for the leadership of the Hellenic world. During the Persian Wars, Sparta and Athens united forces to be able to defeat an empire giant, but fear and jealousy between the two states was too strong to forget. Consequently, in the Age of Pericles, Sparta formed the Peloponnesian League in response to the Delian League, controlled by Athens, leading to the Peloponnesian
It is questionable whether or not the declaration for war was provoked out of the desire for the nations to prove themselves or rather due to a lack of agreement between the two empires- Athens and Sparta. The latter is the most accepted ideology because the Second Peloponnesian War had many events which predated it. It began out of spite and power and the desire to prove a nation’s power; moreover, the war began due
Athens and Sparta, located between the Aegean and the Ionian Sea, allied with each other in the Greco-Persian war. Due to the advanced and powerful navy of Athens incorporation with the well-built army of Sparta, they gained victory over the Persian Empire. After the victory, Athens gained wealth and dominance over the other Greek societies causing tensions between Sparta. They both share similarities towards their cultural background but had different views in creating an ideal society in addition to their state’s place in the world. Moreover, they differ from the concepts of a well trained or educated society and a well built military, but share similarities in their government format.
Sparta vs. Athens To begin with, Athens and Sparta were both famous in antiquity for their legend, cultures and the character of the people. On the one hand, the two poleis share certain obvious affinities, such as language, geographical scope, a common Greek ancestry etc. On the other hand, they were polar opposites in many aspects, from social spheres, political structures, to military might, which I believe there are some hidden depths in these city-states. Hence, let’s look at how did their people obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community, and who held public office first.
The Peloponnesian War lasted three decades, from 431 BC - 404 BC. Thucydides, an Athenian historian and commander in the early years of the war, documented the entire war. Virtually all of our knowledge of the Peloponnesian War comes from Thucydides. Local allegiances to the two cities ensured that all of Greece participated. In addition to the disagreement over the form of government, Sparta feared the increasing power Athens gained as the capitol of Greece.
Thucydides was an Athenian historian that wrote The History of the Peloponnesian War. His account of the conflict is considered a classic and is one of the earliest works of history. When analyzing his work, there are multiple ways to view it. It can be looked at as an objective piece of history that attempts to record the events that unfolded. But it can also be seen as a piece of literature that tries to tell a story and evoke emotion through symbolism rather than be a historical recording.
