Persuasive Essay On Animal Cloning

The public often hears of magnificent animal cloning miracles like Cumulina the Mouse, who lived up to nearly three years when the average lifespan is a few months, and thinks that it is a brilliant scientific occurrence. Conversely in the past decade, animal cloning has become more popular for generating food, but the process has countless flaws. Animal cloning is insufficient for supplying food to mass human populations. The procedure scientists use to clone animals has a high failure rate, and in addition, the clone could suffer from myriad medical issues in life. After numerous surveys were conducted, results displayed that a preponderance of Americans disapprove of using animal cloning to manufacture food. First of all, animal

When there is no demand for their products, suppliers cannot distribute their stock. According to a survey conducted by the American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) in 2006, 66 percent of Americans oppose cloning animals to satisfy human hunger, and that number augments to 88 percent when consumers learn that animals suffer during the process. Other surveys, including those administered by Time and the International Food Information Council, have displayed similar results. A preponderance of the disapproval derives from ethical concerns, which means Americans are less concerned about consumption safety than morality. Above all else, people think animal cloning is “playing God,” according to the AAVS, because it negatively affects animal welfare and could evolve into human cloning or cross-species cloning. Additionally, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed a risk assessment in 2008 on animal cloning, concluding that animal cloning was safe, however, it lacked information on ethical issues as well as accurate facts. A majority of its resources were from cloning companies themselves, and many scientists have proved their claims wrong. For example, scientists have discovered that less than five percent of all animal clones reach maturity due to complications like hydrops and Large Offspring Syndrome, but the FDA simply addressed the issue with the claim that technological advancements have decreased the frequency of these occurrences. Data from numerous scientific resources and even in the FDA’s own risk assessment contradicts their statement. In addition, the FDA’s risk assessment concluded that cloned produce is safe for consumption, but multiple scientists have proved otherwise. Ian Wilmut, who helped lead the cloning of Dolly the Sheep, warns cloners that “even small